784
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 83 points 2 years ago

Can they go after restaurants adding mandatory 20% fees? I don't mind paying more to pay for ethical pay for employees but adding a mandatory 20% free us just lying about menu prices. It should illegal. Just bake the price into the menu prices.

[-] artichokecustard@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

where do you live that tipping is mandatory? or are you talking about something else?

[-] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 16 points 2 years ago

It is essentially a tip, but it's listed on the bottom of the menu as a mandatory service charge. The restaurant keeps the money (it's not split like case tips) and just pay the employees a good wage without them relying on tips.

It's good in theory but it's dishonest pricing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 77 points 2 years ago

Finally.

I hope it ends with better results than that poor attempt that they did in Canada.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Price fixing is temporary, and doomed to fail in the long term. Nixon tried it with an Executive Order and it was a disaster. It caused supply chain constraints and prices shot well past inflation when the Order expired.

Congressional legislation setting grocery store presentation limits would increase brand variety, foster competitive pricing, and put an end to the corporate control over pricing.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What are presentation limits?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

FTC head should be putting a halt on the Kroger+Albertsons merger if he’s really serious.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 49 points 2 years ago

She

But you are correct. My state is suing to prevent that since that would make them a huge percentage of the market and create many areas with no competition.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

But didn't you hear? Less competition makes prices go down. The head of Kroger said so!!!!!

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

How they have gotten around it before is to promise they will keep prices down and then show how things will be much cheaper for them so they can do it. Unsurprisingly they all fail on their promises shortly after but they have already merged by that point and have little fear of being broken up.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

You know things are getting bad when even capitalists are arguing against market economics.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

"We believe the way to be America's best grocer is to provide great value by consistently lowering prices and offering more choices. When we do this, more customers shop with us and buy more groceries, which allows us to reinvest in even lower prices, a better shopping experience, and higher wages," said Rodney McMullen, chairman and CEO of Kroger.

It's a load of tripe. All these big companies come in with lower prices, drive their local competition out of business, then raise them once they've got a local monopoly. Even if Kroger currently has the best of intentions (I don't believe that), I wouldn't trust the next person or the one after that.

We're already fighting a losing battle with suppliers gouging and creating higher prices or shrinking portions for the same price. I'm scared to see what grocery bills would look like under a store monopoly in addition to that.

[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago

My town has a Kroger (city market) and an Albertsons (Safeway). Only other option is Walmart… the proposed merger would be catastrophic to our ability to afford groceries especially since Kroger is already price gouging to the point I can save $10 per 3ish days worth of food going to Walmart.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  • Crime happens

  • People notice the crime happening

  • Journalists report on the crime

  • Documentarians spend thousands of hours collecting data to illustrate the size and scope of the crime

  • A national outcry erupts

  • Politicians finally consider this worth their attention

  • "We're going to look into it."

  • Economic collapse occurs because of all the crime

  • Giant bailouts for all the criminals

  • "Now is not the time to place blame. Also, blame migrants and poor people and idk, maybe Jimmy Carter or something."

  • Economy recovers

  • New Crime happens

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I buy almost exactly the same stuff every week except when the odd condiment/coffee runs out. I went from $60-75/week to $90-100, and now more recently $110+ all within roughly 18 months...

So now I cut back everything.. I eat baked/grilled chicken with beans and canned vegetables for lunch and have salads for dinner, only eating twice a day... All that just to get back to $70/week.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

Just remember, eggs were 12 bucks a dozen until the fed threatened a RICO investigation.

Hopefully the same happens to the rest of our groceries.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Never saw it get $12 crazy, but at one point farmers had to kill off 100 million chickens because of bird flu. That's nearly 1 chicken for every man, woman and child in the US.

Imagine the disposal cost, let alone the costs for sterilizing monstrous chicken warehouses. Then factor in the costs of keeping operations going while they repopulated.

However, there was something I read and can't remember, about the prices staying jacked beyond what was to be expected.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago

The US population is 340 million.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

My dad worked for a private company that was a government contractor for almost 30 years before they were bought out by some international corporation.

I asked my dad if they used to have years where they didn't turn a profit. "Oh absolutely, but we made up for it the next year, or they had money set aside, or..."

None of that happens anymore. Those chickens, I guarantee, caught those diseases because of the practices put in place by the 4 or 5 companies that basically produce all of the poultry for this country. They made poor business decisions, they chose to pinch pennies and not put money aside for unexpected emergencies, they continued to pay out dividends and issue stock buy backs instead of creating an emergency fund like they tell us poors we need to do.

So no, I don't care to imagine any of their costs, because if they were a legitimate business, they would have contingency plans in place beyond "jack the prices up as high as they'll go and keep em there until it starts to hurt our wallets enough." They would take the hit for fucking once instead of passing the cost along to those who can least bare it so they can maintain their lifestyle built on greed and stolen wages.

[-] Bearrorrist@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

The egg-laying chickens were not as affected from everything I heard.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Was it just meat birds?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

at one point farmers had to kill off 100 million chickens because of bird flu. That’s nearly 1 chicken for every man, woman and child in the US.

Didn't seem to impact egg production all that much: https://www.statista.com/statistics/196094/us-total-egg-production-since-2001/

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago

Best case scenario, what can we hope for?

Forgive my cynicism, but even if they get caught for egregiousness, I can't imagine they won't just get a "cost of doing business" slap on the wrist. I can only hope I'm wrong.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree the fines that are issued for these companies is way to low. But on the bright side the FTC is actually doing their job and if it is making C-suite executives even the slightest bit nervous I'm for it. Yep I know that is a low bar but it's something

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

It's absolutely something and a direct result of Democrats being in power.

Could you ever image a republican even asking about price fixing?? They'd probably be passing tax cuts for the offending corporations instead of fighting for the consumer.

[-] SirNameHere@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

As a consumer, probably not much and definitely not fast.

However, in the context of the Albertson and Kroger merger, it could cast shade on that case and impact the outcome.

https://www.grocerydive.com/news/key-kroger-albertsons-merger-court-dates-ftc-washington-colorado/723375/

So I guess, optimistically, we can hope it slows our capitalistic death march towards monopolistic consolidation of businesses.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

does this need investigation? a spike in profit should be rather obvious, if not the spike than increased income and some new mysterious expenses.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Yes it does. Because they need ironclad proof if they're going to take legal action.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Yes, if there's collusion or a lack of competition, there are legal solutions, namely breaking up the offending companies.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

But will those solutions be applied? That's always in doubt.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Who knows, but Khan is the best chance we've had of something getting done in a very long time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 years ago

Why not just unmerge Kroger?

NIAAS, National Incorporation As A Service, fee is the difference between highest paid employee and lowest each year. What they receive, not what some outsourcer charges for a limpeza.

Alternative is full incorporation required in each state operated in.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 21 points 2 years ago
[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Anecdotal, but I really feel like it's the restaurants that are jacking up prices this year.

[-] artichokecustard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

fast food or dine in? it's funny because the less "corporate" the restaurant, the more likely it is that they're getting a lot of their ingredients in the same place that you get yours

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ovata@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Better than nothing I guess.

[-] aeharding@vger.social 3 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
784 points (99.7% liked)

News

36384 readers
823 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS