784
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 83 points 3 months ago

Can they go after restaurants adding mandatory 20% fees? I don't mind paying more to pay for ethical pay for employees but adding a mandatory 20% free us just lying about menu prices. It should illegal. Just bake the price into the menu prices.

[-] artichokecustard@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

where do you live that tipping is mandatory? or are you talking about something else?

[-] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 16 points 3 months ago

It is essentially a tip, but it's listed on the bottom of the menu as a mandatory service charge. The restaurant keeps the money (it's not split like case tips) and just pay the employees a good wage without them relying on tips.

It's good in theory but it's dishonest pricing.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I'd say the same about any "fees" that get tacked on above any advertised prices. The only time it shouldn't be included in an advertised price is when it doesn't scale with number of things purchased. So a % fee would always be included, but flat fees can be separated (like if they had a table charge or something that didn't change based on how much food was ordered).

Online shop "convenience" fees are at the top of my mind for this. Especially because there's even more convenience on the merchant's side due to how websites scale vs brick and mortar shops. They might have to pay large salaries to developers and IT people (emphasis on "might"), but that'll be much less than the leases and staffing costs to open physical stores to serve the same size of market.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 77 points 3 months ago

Finally.

I hope it ends with better results than that poor attempt that they did in Canada.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Price fixing is temporary, and doomed to fail in the long term. Nixon tried it with an Executive Order and it was a disaster. It caused supply chain constraints and prices shot well past inflation when the Order expired.

Congressional legislation setting grocery store presentation limits would increase brand variety, foster competitive pricing, and put an end to the corporate control over pricing.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

What are presentation limits?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

FTC head should be putting a halt on the Kroger+Albertsons merger if he’s really serious.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 49 points 3 months ago

She

But you are correct. My state is suing to prevent that since that would make them a huge percentage of the market and create many areas with no competition.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

But didn't you hear? Less competition makes prices go down. The head of Kroger said so!!!!!

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

How they have gotten around it before is to promise they will keep prices down and then show how things will be much cheaper for them so they can do it. Unsurprisingly they all fail on their promises shortly after but they have already merged by that point and have little fear of being broken up.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

You know things are getting bad when even capitalists are arguing against market economics.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

"We believe the way to be America's best grocer is to provide great value by consistently lowering prices and offering more choices. When we do this, more customers shop with us and buy more groceries, which allows us to reinvest in even lower prices, a better shopping experience, and higher wages," said Rodney McMullen, chairman and CEO of Kroger.

It's a load of tripe. All these big companies come in with lower prices, drive their local competition out of business, then raise them once they've got a local monopoly. Even if Kroger currently has the best of intentions (I don't believe that), I wouldn't trust the next person or the one after that.

We're already fighting a losing battle with suppliers gouging and creating higher prices or shrinking portions for the same price. I'm scared to see what grocery bills would look like under a store monopoly in addition to that.

[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

My town has a Kroger (city market) and an Albertsons (Safeway). Only other option is Walmart… the proposed merger would be catastrophic to our ability to afford groceries especially since Kroger is already price gouging to the point I can save $10 per 3ish days worth of food going to Walmart.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  • Crime happens

  • People notice the crime happening

  • Journalists report on the crime

  • Documentarians spend thousands of hours collecting data to illustrate the size and scope of the crime

  • A national outcry erupts

  • Politicians finally consider this worth their attention

  • "We're going to look into it."

  • Economic collapse occurs because of all the crime

  • Giant bailouts for all the criminals

  • "Now is not the time to place blame. Also, blame migrants and poor people and idk, maybe Jimmy Carter or something."

  • Economy recovers

  • New Crime happens

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I buy almost exactly the same stuff every week except when the odd condiment/coffee runs out. I went from $60-75/week to $90-100, and now more recently $110+ all within roughly 18 months...

So now I cut back everything.. I eat baked/grilled chicken with beans and canned vegetables for lunch and have salads for dinner, only eating twice a day... All that just to get back to $70/week.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Just remember, eggs were 12 bucks a dozen until the fed threatened a RICO investigation.

Hopefully the same happens to the rest of our groceries.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Never saw it get $12 crazy, but at one point farmers had to kill off 100 million chickens because of bird flu. That's nearly 1 chicken for every man, woman and child in the US.

Imagine the disposal cost, let alone the costs for sterilizing monstrous chicken warehouses. Then factor in the costs of keeping operations going while they repopulated.

However, there was something I read and can't remember, about the prices staying jacked beyond what was to be expected.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 18 points 3 months ago

The US population is 340 million.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

My dad worked for a private company that was a government contractor for almost 30 years before they were bought out by some international corporation.

I asked my dad if they used to have years where they didn't turn a profit. "Oh absolutely, but we made up for it the next year, or they had money set aside, or..."

None of that happens anymore. Those chickens, I guarantee, caught those diseases because of the practices put in place by the 4 or 5 companies that basically produce all of the poultry for this country. They made poor business decisions, they chose to pinch pennies and not put money aside for unexpected emergencies, they continued to pay out dividends and issue stock buy backs instead of creating an emergency fund like they tell us poors we need to do.

So no, I don't care to imagine any of their costs, because if they were a legitimate business, they would have contingency plans in place beyond "jack the prices up as high as they'll go and keep em there until it starts to hurt our wallets enough." They would take the hit for fucking once instead of passing the cost along to those who can least bare it so they can maintain their lifestyle built on greed and stolen wages.

[-] Bearrorrist@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

The egg-laying chickens were not as affected from everything I heard.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Was it just meat birds?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

at one point farmers had to kill off 100 million chickens because of bird flu. That’s nearly 1 chicken for every man, woman and child in the US.

Didn't seem to impact egg production all that much: https://www.statista.com/statistics/196094/us-total-egg-production-since-2001/

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 36 points 3 months ago

Best case scenario, what can we hope for?

Forgive my cynicism, but even if they get caught for egregiousness, I can't imagine they won't just get a "cost of doing business" slap on the wrist. I can only hope I'm wrong.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree the fines that are issued for these companies is way to low. But on the bright side the FTC is actually doing their job and if it is making C-suite executives even the slightest bit nervous I'm for it. Yep I know that is a low bar but it's something

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

It's absolutely something and a direct result of Democrats being in power.

Could you ever image a republican even asking about price fixing?? They'd probably be passing tax cuts for the offending corporations instead of fighting for the consumer.

[-] SirNameHere@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

As a consumer, probably not much and definitely not fast.

However, in the context of the Albertson and Kroger merger, it could cast shade on that case and impact the outcome.

https://www.grocerydive.com/news/key-kroger-albertsons-merger-court-dates-ftc-washington-colorado/723375/

So I guess, optimistically, we can hope it slows our capitalistic death march towards monopolistic consolidation of businesses.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

does this need investigation? a spike in profit should be rather obvious, if not the spike than increased income and some new mysterious expenses.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Yes it does. Because they need ironclad proof if they're going to take legal action.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Yes, if there's collusion or a lack of competition, there are legal solutions, namely breaking up the offending companies.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

But will those solutions be applied? That's always in doubt.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Who knows, but Khan is the best chance we've had of something getting done in a very long time.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

We're at an inflection point where Federal government arms actually have to show the citizens they sometimes work. Something may actually happen here. Many government agencies like them, the FCC, DOE, DOT, and FTC are actually being run by people that are trying to make a difference. Did a 4000 mile road trip across the US over the holidays and was impressed to see so many bridges actually being fixed, rebuilt, or replaced. First time I've ever seen that level of progress. (Or at least, level of undoing technical debt.)

Not to fill you with false optimism though. I've not seen our federal government do anything useful my entire life, only take away rights with things like the Patriot Act and making women not be people anymore, so I have a hard time myself believing they will actually do something for the People.

Opposite corollary: They antitrusted Google over search while Google is currently being run by morons and failing at everything, meanwhile ignoring that Apple is becoming an actual monopoly in the US and segregating the population based on the color of a text bubble; owning media production, distribution, and sales; and other bad behavior.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

namely breaking up the offending companies.

When was the last time this happened?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 3 months ago

Not only inflated prices, start measuring and draining canned vegetables. They're all slacking off with the ratio of food to filling. One can of veggies that allegedly had 425g of vegetable in it ended up only having 200g of vegetable in it after the liquid was drained.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Fresh or frozen vegetables are better for you, and usually cost the same as canned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago

Why not just unmerge Kroger?

NIAAS, National Incorporation As A Service, fee is the difference between highest paid employee and lowest each year. What they receive, not what some outsourcer charges for a limpeza.

Alternative is full incorporation required in each state operated in.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 21 points 3 months ago
[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Anecdotal, but I really feel like it's the restaurants that are jacking up prices this year.

[-] artichokecustard@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

fast food or dine in? it's funny because the less "corporate" the restaurant, the more likely it is that they're getting a lot of their ingredients in the same place that you get yours

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ovata@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Better than nothing I guess.

[-] aeharding@vger.social 3 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
784 points (99.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
2319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS