37
submitted 3 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

National Public Data scrapes the personally identifying information of billions of individuals from non-public sources

Honest question: If these sources are non-public, how did National Public Data get access?

Facetious questions: If they are using private or restricted sources of data accumulation on an international scale, should they be calling themselves National Public Data? Seems like Global Private Data would be more fitting.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago
[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Your 0.0034$ is in the mail

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

claimed to have access to the personal data of 2.9 billion people from the U.S., U.K., and Canada

How does that work, when the total population of those countries is less than 0.5 billion?

[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

As individuals will each have multiple records associated with them, one for each of their previous home addresses, the breach does not expose information about 2.7 billion different people. Furthermore, according to BleepingComputer, some impacted individuals have confirmed that the SSN associated with their info in the data dump is not correct.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Another reminder to use privacy-respecting stuff and fake identities for as much as possible online.

[-] madeindjs@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Do you know if a browser extension allow to fill Signup form with fake data ?

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why don't you just enter random data yourself every time?

[-] madeindjs@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Because I'm lazy haha. I found this one for Firefox which is perfect !

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

If they have my data and it includes a SSN, I can guarantee it’s not accurate.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Spoiler: it is only a fraction of that

They duplicated records and hoped no one would notice. Don't believe me? Look at the data yourself or find someone who has.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

They appear to have Experian or TransUnion data which provides multiple records for a single individual. If they pulled in records from multiple sources, (eg, all the credit agencies), then the number of records per person would balloon rapidly.

The worrying thing is that if these are timestamped, that set of data can tell an awful lot about a person that’s useful for identity theft.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

They are actually identical according to posts I've scene online

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31987 readers
520 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS