46
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by LEVI@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

And what features and/or technologies you'd rather not see in a web browser

Lets make this interesting: you can imagine features ( there's no wrong answers ) , its not just about features that you already saw in other browsers

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The most basic, minimal, light browser ever built with a well thought out extension framework. I want almost nothing built in.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

This is what gemini is about.

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

So like back to the '90s with Netscape Navigatior and its plugins?

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Or iCab of the late 90s.

Honestly I don’t think it’s much to ask to make the browser as lean as possible and have development focused on browsing and leave most of the rest to extensions. It’s kind more like where we were 14 years ago.

Edit: Features I wouldn’t mind built in would be much like what vibi suggested. Built in volume control , per tab. Stuff like that makes sense.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/10198327

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 months ago

The thing I want natively is a built-in way to control volume per tab- not just mute, not through a plugin... Just a simple volume slider that works.

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

This would be a nice feature.

[-] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 14 points 3 months ago
  • Tab-organisation features (e.g. stacking, trees)
  • Synchronised history - so you can find something you were looking at on your phone on your desktop or vice-versa
  • Containers (Firefox) are great
  • Full-page screenshot (Firefox) is very handy
[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

'Multi-Account Containers': https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers

With it, you can open tabs in different 'containers', which have their own set of cookies, etc.. So, for example, you can be logged into two accounts for the same website, just in different containers, or keep all your shopping accounts in one container (and set those sites to always open in that container) to reduce tracking and targeting.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ah. Interesting. For work I log in to a bunch of AWS accounts and I'm only able to do two at a time. One in a normal window and another in a private window. But I can't open a 3rd private window. So this will be the answer, I think.

Thank you!

[-] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Synchronized favorites is pretty nice too.

About synchronization, one i've never seen is tabs, being able to open any tabs on one device to another. Maybe the clipboard could also be useful to share link/text to another device...

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I wanted to make coffee. Not a coffee maker that has a web browser - a web browser that can make coffee.

[-] Willem@kutsuya.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Extension on HTTP 418 I'm a Teapot

[-] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"Would you like some cookies with your coffee?"

I want the old animated Netscape logo in the corner back

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nemo@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago
  • built-in adblocker

  • ability to have JavaScript / sound / image loading turned off by default but with a whitelist of sites that can run / play / load them

  • built-in secure password manager

  • open-source, natch

  • native ssh and ftp

  • a button that autogenerates a metadata-free, archived link to the current page

  • bring back flash

  • can open any folder of folders of images as a slideshow

  • feeds false metadata to sites trying to fingerprint the user

  • rejects / autodeletes all but whitelisted cookies

  • built-in tamagotchi / virtual pets

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  • built-in adblocker
  • built-in secure password manager
  • built-in tamagotchi / virtual pets

I believe most would prefer a modular approach with a well built extension and addon framework.


  • can open any folder of folders of images as a slideshow
  • native ssh and ftp

I’d prefer the web browser to be good at web browsing. Excellent software already exists that does all of that.


  • bring back flash

Dear god no

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

out of curiosity, what might I use for the slideshow application?

[-] zelifcam@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Gwenview has a slide show option. Slideshow is not listed on the page, but it’s in the app.

[-] Trent@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

bring back flash

There are really good reasons flash died. If you're desperate for flash content, use ruffle.

[-] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

ftp

It's crazy that Firefox was good with ftp until they just decided to not support it anymore 😕

[-] rozwud@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Upvoted for the tamagotchi / virtual pets. The other stuff, too, but mostly the virtual pets.

[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

if i open a site that ive opened x times this week/month a popup appears that says "no" then the pc shuts down and cannot be turned on for 3 hours.

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

saying: "no" sounds rude.. maybe something like "no, go touch grass" that'd be better

[-] chottomatte@lemdro.id 7 points 3 months ago

Data saving option for mobile netwerk , and website's RSS feed finder , webpage translation too .... As for what I don't want to see : big installation size , ugly design and tracking

[-] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

website's RSS feed finder

On Firefox, the RSSHubRadar extension is useful for that.
The feature being available by default in browsers would be cool

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

I really just want web browsers to die, and be replaced by one of the slimmed down options like gemini, gopher, or some markdown viewer.

The web just keeps getting increasingly bloated and ad-ridden, and filled with popups. Web browsers are as complex as entire operating systems now, so only 2 orgs (google and mozilla) have the resources and expertise to build a browser, and mozilla might throw in the towel eventually, leaving the internet as one big google ad.

IE move viewing of mostly static content into these simple variants like gemini, and move dynamic things to local apps with API access.

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago

that's a quite pessimistic stance, yes I do agree that web browsers are complexe and hard to maintain, but they can do more than viewing websites, you can play games, draw art, video chat, PDF viewing and editing, you can do a lot with just one app.. that's the beauty of Web browsers.. The problem is in the Ad business model..

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

they can do more than viewing websites

The question is: should they? There is a larger philosophical divide about whether software tools should be small and purpose-built, or monolithic. Having one do-it-all tool can be convenient but also creates a huge amount of overhead and complexity.

I go back and forth myself. I love the convenience of monolithic tools, but miss the way a small, purpose-built tool can really do its job well.

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

One of the best cases for building a versatile tool, is accessibility to less privileged populations, for example people who can't efford to have a reliable Internet because of their shady ISPs, they need a browser that renders web content as fast as possible, and also because they can't afford to download apps due to slow internet speeds, Flatpaks could take gigabyte of HDD space and you have to update them later, which is painful in other parts of the world

Even if the user had a reliable Internet and solid hardware, maybe they're a security minded individual, and want to keep their app installs to a minimum. To them many apps are considered bloat and that's dangerous.

I think the difficulty lies in wisely choosing what features to include, before your users start asking : hey, do we really need that ? Or : who uses that ?

that's why listening to feedback is so important

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They shouldn't be doing any of those things, html should be for simple, static content only.

For dynamic / interactive things, programmers should write programs again like they used to.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

On android...Firefox refreshes the page any time you go to another tab or app and come back. That drives me batshit.

[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 3 months ago

It rather sounds like too little free RAM or too agressive RAM management (frequent on Chinese phones) forcing Firefox to kill the tab as soon as you leave it.

[-] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

For my own use RAM management shouldn't be a thing, i want all my apps to either stay loaded or just crash completely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Dark theme and accessible color contrast enforced by default.

If the site owner makes stupid choices, my browser should ignore them.

Edit: And an automatic switch to light theme if I decode to print something, obviously. I wasn't raised in a barn.

[-] corroded@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Personally, I'd be happy with a web browser that doesn't make me jump through hoops to access a HTTPS site with certificate errors on a local IP address.

I don't care if 192.168.1.1 is using a self-signed certificate. I just want to configure my fucking router.

[-] bradboimler@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'd like to be able to link a web app and its mobile app (lemmy.world and Jerboa for example). And to set a limit to the amount of time I spend on the pair. And have that sync across all my devices.

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

that's interesting, I'm not sure I understand the idea, do you want the browser to monitor the mobile app time usage ( Jerboa ), I'm i correct ?

[-] bradboimler@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I spend too much time on Lemmy. And I do use an app timer on my phone. I need the website to take away from that same timer as well. When I use the website on my phone and on my laptop. I'm happy to make this clearer.

[-] ganymede@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

background/defocused tabs are 'paused' by default.

paused meaning no runtime execution of scripts or anything else.

firstly, there's always some security and plenty of privacy mischief around focus.

secondly, it's almost always wasting cycles, so its just wasteful of resources and energy.

ofc with some option for you to eg. right-click on a tab and mark it as 'runtime in background' or something, for webmail or messengers etc which you do want runtime.

but it should essentially be whitelisted.

i've actually played with this in the firefox debugger and it essentially appears feasible so really hope this feature comes oneday - or i finally get some time to look into making an addon for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

A limit of data that can be used daily and we can track how much data we consume.

A little discrete "progress bar" at the bottom of the toolbar would be cool to see in the blink of an eye where I am on my daily limit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

I want regex find. I'm fairly certain firefox used to have it, but no longer seems to.

I have a vague memory of this but it might have been an extension.

[-] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m still looking for the browser with the best tab design and management (sync across devices being a requirement). Arc was pretty good in this regard, but the AI stuff was too obnoxious for me. Now I’m back to Safari.

[-] nicerdicer@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

As an addition to the translation tool (context menu in Firefox) it would be nice to have a conversion tool for the conversion of temperatures and lengths. I know there are addons for this purpose, but last time i checked they weren't good or they were a hassle to use. Opera nailed it a few years ago with a little pop-up window when text got highlighted. It recognized when it was a SI unit. This is a feature that I have not seen in any other browser yet.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
1216 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS