314
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 182 points 2 months ago

I don't think "hey everyone, let's make fun of a disabled 17-year-old tearfully expressing love for his father" is gonna play as well as they thought.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 130 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

talk radio host Jay Weber tried to parody Tim Walz, tweeting, “Meet my son Gus. He’s a blubbering bitch boy. His mother and I are very proud.” Weber later said that he deleted his tweet after learning that Gus was disabled—he just meant to attack a 17-year-old boy for being emotional.(Weber has since deleted his explanatory tweet as well.)

What a bunch of weirdos

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 months ago

It's funny(depressing?) to think that someone probably had to tell him that his explanation for the first tweet wasn't making anything better and that he did not get it by himself. And I'm sure he still doesn't understand what he did wrong

[-] bradv@lemmy.ca 81 points 2 months ago

MAGA doesn't care. They were fine with Trump making fun of someone with CP in 2016, and they're fine with this.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 108 points 2 months ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

Sounds about right for the weirdo influencers of the modern GOP.

Walz is good guy, the local coach, his son is proud of him, and his son has been diagnosed with some mental disabilities. This is a normal American family in 2024.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Disability aside, I don't think it's at all unusual for a family member to express emotion like that for such a momentous situation. There's only a few things that gets tears out of me—movies where the dog dies, amazing acts of heroism and selflessness, exhaustion in emergency scenarios—but I'm pretty sure I'd lose it if my father was taking on a national leadership position, there's a huge crowd cheering him, and everyone's saying how great he is.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

The far right is obsessed with this image of hyper masculinity from Alex Jones's magic pills to Andrew Tate to AI generated Trump with Superman's figure. Their ideal men in that world do not show emotion and they damn well never cry even in happiness, that stuff is for women and other weaklings that need a strong man to run their lives. And it's all based in insecurity.

They have no idea that people with real strength of character are secure in themselves and can show tenderness and vulnerability knowing that does not define them as weak.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

So true. For me, one of the most masculine things a man can do is cry in public without shame. It shows that they’re secure enough in their emotions to know that crying is a completely natural and usually quite helpful thing for people of any gender to do.

[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

It is okay for macho men to cry and show every emotion available - “Macho Man” Randy Savage

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 months ago

They are also weird about Kamala's step daughter

[-] jlewis@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh man, Ann Coulter...what a blast from the past! You can talk about your Marjorie Taylor Greens or your Lauren Boeberts, but she was going batshit crazy for attention back when those two were still pulling the hair off of their Barbie dolls. And she's still out there, working the county fair circuit, opening for Right Said Fred on their "Shit left over from the 90s" tour.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'd forgotten she even existed. I mean conservative media is infested with "blonde" taking heads without conscience or empathy.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Oh hey look, the new ann coulter proposal video just droppe... And, he called it off.

Just think of the fucking human sludge it would take to propose to ann coulter in the first place, and then realize that those dudes STILL couldn't go through with it. They got one full whiff and said, "LOOK lady... I literally pay millions of dollars to hunt human children for fun in Luxembourg, I have a Michelin chef flown in to prepare their livers for me for dinner... but YOU are just a god damn irredeemable monster... I can't go through with this..."

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I mean hell I'll make about any joke and even I don't think I've gone in on their kids.

Now once an adult and they become adulterating, addicted, unwed parents while giving abstinence lectures that's another story.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That end wokeness take... As bad as a lot of SP takes have been, they have a long record of treating disability with respect. If they did make a bit about it, it would not be what end wokeness is looking for.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
314 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS