239
TWO WORLD WARS BABEY!! (sh.itjust.works)
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 74 points 3 weeks ago

Why do the army guys always attack these bunkers instead of just going around, are they stupid?

[-] superkret@feddit.org 71 points 3 weeks ago

are they stupid?

Yes, that's why they are in the army.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

They're in the army because they're poor.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 weeks ago

And poor because they are stupid. Checkmate leftist. /s

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
  • Poor and smart - airforce - nobody messes with American planes
  • Poor and fit - marines
  • Poor and dumb - army
[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 14 points 3 weeks ago
[-] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Smart and lazy - space force

Come on, if Black Adder was American and had to join a service, he'd totally bribe the right people for the space force.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Historically speaking you can damage an American aircraft and get away with it, you just need to be lucky. No, if you want everyone to be afraid to touch you, join the navy. Touching American boats either with or without provocation is anathema. You touch the boat, you get the smoke, end of story.

[-] nuke@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

Air Force gang throwing mad shade

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 weeks ago

There is no "around". These things were setup with overlapping fields of fire.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

And surrounded by minefields.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

Man deep cut. When was the last good one released?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Sadly never got around to playing it. I loved red faction 2 a ton

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

The ReMarstered edition still holds up so there's still time

[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's one of not very many games I've beaten multiple times as an adult. Sure as a kid I beat games repeatedly, but now I have a massive library full of choice and between the original and remake it's been like, 4 times.

Excellent game.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

I thought the actual gameplay of Armageddon was good, but the linear structure killed it for me.

[-] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 50 points 3 weeks ago

What weapon actually did that, artillery fragmentation?

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 90 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But the vast majority of the shell fire is not as a result of the battle which raged around St Malo for nearly two weeks. After the battle, the Americans brought up various tanks and other anti-tank weapons into range and fired at them to see how much punishment they would take. It is incredible to see that virtually all the hits show shells bouncing off or merely embedding themselves into the armoured steel without penetrating it. I found only one shell hole which had penetrated the cupola straight through, whilst one other shell appears to have found a way in at the point where the moveable gun port shield slots into the turret.

https://www.historyalive.je/2017/10/08/fort-de-la-cite-dalet-st-malo-roman-ww2-german-fortifications/

Edited for context

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Though it held up, I bet if anyone was hiding in there they would be concussed into vegetation

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

I think I'd prefer to just be shot.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

You mean you don't want to be inside the world's thickest bell when it gets hit with a main battle cannon?

Say it ain't so.

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 weeks ago

If this is at the beach landing, decent odds it was shore bombardment from some of the smaller weapons. The amount of naval fire directed at the opposing forces on the beach was incredible. My favorite little moment I've heard about from that was a battleship engaging a sniper nest that infantry had radioed in with their 16" main guns. There's a naval historian on YouTube by the name drachinifels, I highly recommend watching his video on operation Neptune.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Saint-Malo

Guessing it was one of the defenses that was hit by close range artillery fire.

[-] Radikole@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Right? That's a good guess

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

they better be wearing their earplugs

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

I may have underestimated 45acp.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago

Back then the bullets were on meth too.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Those pistols shoot some damn big bullets.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
239 points (95.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6444 readers
690 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS