A lot of the reasons not to use AI is it just makes up random shit...
But even with that it's probably more accurate than what a fucking cop would write.
What I'm worried about is cops making sure the AI says what they want (lies) and then when questioned they'll blame the AI to escape consequences
I've signed a lot of forms that say something like "I certify that the information I have provided is true and accurate". Using ChatGPT doesn't absolve me of that. It shouldn't for them either (but we all know they're held to a different standard).
What is more racist, though? The average cop or the average LLM? I'd wager a guess it's the average cop. So, it would still be a net benefit.
Devils advocate: in the case of a monthly report, often an LLM is used like "take these current statistics and update last month's report to include them."
As in... the LLM is not developing an opinion it's just presenting the numbers.
Monthly reporting is usually very formulaic. There's no scope for "I propose forming a lynch mob comprised of vigilanties".
This isn't about them using them for monthly reports, this is about them using LLMs for individual incident reports
Pulling from all the sounds and radio chatter picked up by the microphone attached to Gilbert’s body camera, the AI tool churned out a report in eight seconds. ...
Oklahoma City’s police department is one of a handful to experiment with AI chatbots to produce the first drafts of incident reports. Police officers who’ve tried it are enthused about the time-saving technology, while some prosecutors, police watchdogs and legal scholars have concerns about how it could alter a fundamental document in the criminal justice system that plays a role in who gets prosecuted or imprisoned.
“take these current statistics and update last month’s report to include them.”
That is literally the worst use case for an LLM. Something a simple script could do, but it is hard dry data the LLM is free to hallucinate with and people are lazy to check over manually.
Also, LLMs can't math.
the AI doesn't have fucking racial bias, humanity and the content they produce they fit into the AI has a racist bias.
No need to split hairs here. The product that people use and call "AI" is what is relevant.
So your logic is that a child can't be racist if the parents are racist?
No, that a knife isn't racist when its owner goes on a muslim stabbing spree.
I never saw a knife capable of writing a police report, or doing anything else we normally attribute to only brains.
The problem with AI is that they seem to become racist by "choosing" racist stigma over the alternative, despite racist stigma is NOT the majority of the info they are based on.
TheGrio - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for TheGrio:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Internet Archive - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Internet Archive:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://web.archive.org/web/20240828120602/https://thegrio.com/2024/08/27/police-officers-are-starting-to-use-ai-chatbots-to-write-crime-reports-despite-concerns-over-racial-bias-in-ai-technology/
https://thegrio.com/2024/08/27/police-officers-are-starting-to-use-ai-chatbots-to-write-crime-reports-despite-concerns-over-racial-bias-in-ai-technology/
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.