174
submitted 2 months ago by plinky@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 95 points 2 months ago

Every time jury nullification is used for based reasons, we get a little bit closer to people casting aside civility politics and understanding how power really operates. Uncritical support to the actionists, and those jurors will sleep well knowing they allowed heroes to go free.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 34 points 2 months ago

Is this why pal action people keep getting off? Do they have jury nullification in Britain?

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 48 points 2 months ago

They do, similar to the US it’s not really a specific feature and more a natural consequence of having a jury decide and not punishing jurors for the decisions they make

[-] edge@hexbear.net 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How would you even punish jurors for that? Someone else (the judge I guess) would have to decide that their decision was "wrong", and at that point why even have jurors?

[-] SeekTheDeletion@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

As long as the juror doesn’t mention they are doing nullification they can get away with it. They just have to play dumb and keep repeating truisms over and over about how they aren’t convinced by the evidence

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 34 points 2 months ago

For a much longer time period it was actually because the state was just releasing members. They did not want to prosecute and open up weapons companies to the "discovery" phase of court trials.

[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They have a stronger version than the US because lawyers can argue for it to the jury. In the US they aren't allowed to do it, and most states have model jury instructions that tell them they are not allowed to ignore the law because they think it unjust.

[-] SeekTheDeletion@hexbear.net 26 points 2 months ago

Not only can the defense not mention it, nobody can. It will get you thrown off the jury instantly and the entire thing declared a mistrial, redone without you.

There was one guy who kept protesting outside courthouses to tell jurors about jury nullification and he had been harassed and arrested dozens of times.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 50 points 2 months ago

Why the fuck does the judge have to pre approve what kind of defense you’re going to use? They absolutely should’ve been able to claim the responsibility to save lives.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Dictatorship of the bourgeoisie something something

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 months ago

It's the judges job to review the arguments for congruence with law. In a contrived example, if you go to court for a speeding ticket and argue ignorance of the speed limit, the judge's job is stop that shit from consuming court time because it's not the job of the jury to determine whether ignorance is a valid defense. By the rules, it isn't.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago

Leading to a hung jury

Damn right

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago

wild that the judge let them try to nullify the jury themselves

[-] Maturin@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

slight quibble: they advocated for the jury to nullify the law, not to nullify the jury (but you are right that it is shocking the judge let them do this)

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
174 points (100.0% liked)

news

23564 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS