183
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Anthony Odiong is accused of sexual assault by at least eight women whom the priest had been counseling

The criminal case that authorities are building against a Roman Catholic priest accused of preying on women whom he met while working in south-east Louisiana and Texas is progressing, with a grand jury in the latter state indicting him on three felony sexual assault charges.

Anthony Odiong, 55, faces two counts of second-degree sexual assault as well as one of first-degree sexual assault in the charges handed up against him recently in the McLennan county, Texas, state court.

The charges against Odiong – who was first arrested in July – involve two women. He could receive up to life imprisonment if convicted of the first-degree charge, a stiffer penalty that stems from the fact that the alleged victim in the case was a woman whom Odiong was prohibited from “marrying or purporting to marry” under Texas law. The second-degree counts each carry up to 20 years in prison in what is one of only about a dozen states with a law that criminalizes sexual activity between clergymen and adults who emotionally depend on their spiritual advice.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These do not seem like laws that would be on the books or enforced in Texas. Quelle surprise.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well . . . there's a . . . special . . uh, clause . . no, an . . uh . . "X factor" if you will. A "suprise element" to the law. An . . . extra layer, say, of jurisprudence in this case that the AG's office of the very not-impeached-for-corruption Ken Paxton has elected to enforce, as they say in court filings, "with prejudice".

Now, should there be . . . other? . . . Catholic priests who are - let's say, hypothetically, just for the sake of argument here - who are perhaps under investigation for the same or worse crimes - well, now. That would all depend wouldn't it. In Texas. Or, possibly Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky or . . ."Other".

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

commas are real good for this kind of thing

[-] riskable@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago

Don't ever change, Catholic Church. More and more people are starting to catch on. In 100 years there might not be a Catholic Church anymore and the world will be better for it.

This headline could've appeared every month for the past 2000 years. It's just that only in modern times are priests and pastors facing actual consequences.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Don't ever change, Catholic Church

I would accept them changing to "non-existent " status.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Preying on vulnerable women.

This trait appears to be so common in religious institutions.

How horrible.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

He should have incorporated himself. That way no Texas court would ever convict him of anything.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

In Mbin this is "related" to the Cheney-Thomas article and displays Liz's picture.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Halfway into article, the priest had child sexual abuse images and a new link. The last paragraph is 🤢 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/18/catholic-priest-jailed

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
183 points (98.9% liked)

News

23265 readers
3955 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS