397
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

New York police have defended their actions after a bystander was shot in the head as two officers tackled a fare-evader armed with a knife in a busy subway station.

The man was in critical condition after the shooting at Sutter Avenue L station in Brooklyn on Sunday afternoon. Three others, including the suspect, were wounded.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 118 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait so did they find the knife? I was reading reports they couldn’t even find a knife.

Edit: yup, no knife

The police said on Sunday that a knife had been recovered and posted a picture on social media. The next day, however, it posted another message saying the knife had been taken from the crime scene by an unidentified man

I will point out that the story has a body cam screenshot showing the knife, presumably in the suspect’s hand.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 70 points 2 months ago

The clothing in the picture doesn't match the clothing the suspect was booked in. So it's still in question.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago

You mean the NYPD would just go out there on the internet and tell lies?!?

Yeah, not surprised.

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago

~~bystander was shot in the head~~

Police shot innocent bystander in the head.

FTFY

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

The reporter actively chose to give the police a pass by using passive voice here. "Bystander shot in the head" sounds like something that just happened or was unavoidable when we're really dealing with "Police shoot innocent bystander in the head while subduing fare evader." I mean, fuck, how hard is it to have basic police accountability?

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Hey, it’s their fault for being in the path of that bullet traveling at 1200 feet per second. They had 0.0133 seconds to move out of the way. They made the decision to keep standing in a dangerous spot

(/s in case that wasn’t clear)

[-] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, fuck, how hard is it to have basic police accountability?

Almost impossible

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

And said bystander is in critical condition.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 91 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The passive (or exonerative) voice in that article is infuriating. Police tackle the suspect, but the bystander was just "shot in the head". By whom? Hard to say when you're licking boots.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

Clearly he was shot by the knife!

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

Which is why I always bring a knife to a pillow fight!

I've lost many friends...

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

But you've yet to lose a pillow fight.

Focus on what's important.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago

Sometimes headshots develop spontaneously. It's a rare condition, but convenient. Some claim John F. Kennedy suffered from this condition.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 74 points 2 months ago

Getting shot for the crime of someone else jumping a turnstile, classic

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

“You saw him - he had a gun”

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 51 points 2 months ago

Janno Liever, the chief executive of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said that the incident "started because somebody wanted to come to the transit system with a weapon, somebody who... had a history of crime and a history of violence and even gun charges".

Yes, and besides those two there was a guy with a knife as well.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

Last I heard they hadn't found the knife yet.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 15 points 2 months ago

...planted the knife yet.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 months ago

"Make no mistake, the events that occurred... were the results of an armed perpetrator"

No, your idiot cop shooting someone in the head was the result of your idiot cop shooting someone in the head.

[-] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, 100% the cop's fault. If a person feels it's better to shoot an innocent bystander in the head than risk being stabbed, then they're in the wrong line of work. Get out and let someone with better judgement have a go.

[-] nul42@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 months ago

Public transit should be fully funded and free and accessible for all to use.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 2 months ago

I would also accept a "pay what you want" system. Wasting money on enforcement of $3 fares is idiotic.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago

IME this is largely the stance that the LA Metro buses* take, as long as you're not causing trouble. A lot of the time I get waved on for the card not reading quick enough (resulting in a free ride), and I've literally never seen a driver tell someone to leave because their card won't scan or they don't have the money for it.

Which, when you think about it makes sense. The $1.75 or so they're 'losing' from the passenger not paying (the bus will be going that route anyway, regardless of whether they board or not) will be FAR exceeded by the cost of paying a bus driver to sit there with a bus out of commission for however long it takes cops to get there and force someone out, PLUS a literal bus full of now pissed off people who may be missing connections because some bus driver had a stick up his ass. It absolutely doesn't make sense unless the fare-evader in question is either a chronic problem causer or an immediate threat.

* trains/subways are a different matter, they have cops checking randomly onboard there to fine people

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

But think of the oil and gas shareholders!

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 32 points 2 months ago

Wish framing were different. Not "innocent bystander", but a more specific version of "father of 3 on way home from a long day of work", or whatever.

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 months ago

I kind of don't like this. People are not worth more or less. We should be just as outraged at shooting a homeless immigrant on their way to an appointment for a sex date with a Grindr hookup as with your hypothetical father of 3 on the way home from work.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

People should be.

People clearly are not.

I don't like it either.

Many people need to easily picture ourselves in the exact situation.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 2 months ago

not about valuing one life over another. the idea (I'm guessing) is to describe the victim a bit so folks have some points of empathy

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago

Ahh yes clearly the only sensible solution to a man ~~taking the tube~~ ‘riding the subway’ without paying for a ticket is to pull out your Big Gun™️ and shoot ~~him~~ some poor fucking random guy in the head fuck my life bro holy shit

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago

was shot

We need to rename "passive voice" to "police voice".

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"executed by state personel without trial or due process" is more accurate. We should just call police "government agents" .

[-] poo@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

fucking apparently ACABS (all cops are bad shots - fucking stormtrooper arse muthafuckas over here)

[-] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

In before the fare-evader is charged with murder

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Of course, through transitive properties the fare dodger shot the gun <- us legal system

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

New York police have defended their actions after a bystander was shot in the head

This.

This is the problem already. Instead of "something happened, the officers in charge are temporarily on hold until we have fully investigated this incident" it's immediately defending the indefensible.

I'm all for unions but fuck the police union with an umbrella. Defending workers rights is great but this is defending psychopaths, defending no and bad training, defending violence, defending an abusive system that by now has killed thousands over decades.

STIO DEFENDING THIS SHIT

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Nobody said how big.

[-] TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Does pepper spray not exist anymore?

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

they carry batons in a lot of countries

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

They carry batons here, too. And Tasers, and pepper spray, and lots of other weapons that are not guns.

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The batons also fire bullets. In fact, the pepper spray and taser fire bullets too.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

At this point I feel more threatened by cops than I do by whatever they're supposed to be "protecting us" from.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A corrupt-mayor-hiding-body-cam-video-evidence says what?

Also: "New York authorities have made reducing crime on the subway and buses a top priority following a series of violent attacks, robberies and murders. A crackdown on fare evasion is part of that push."

One of these things is not like the others.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago

They died as a hero in the war against fare evasion.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They also shot each other. Previously I would have been like maybe they should be better at conflict de-escalation and equipped with more efficient non lethal weapons (apparently multiple shots from their tasers did not work). Now I am down to more basic training, like maybe they should get better gun range training accounting for close quarters situations with bystanders?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Shooting bystanders is particularly an NYPD issue. To stop so many negligent discharges they mandated an 11lb trigger pull weight, this is about double the pull weight of normal pistols. This makes if significantly harder to shoot accurately without intense training that cops also don't get.

[-] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I watch a lot of high speed police chase videos, kind of a guilty pleasure of mine. It's fascinating stuff. One thing I've noticed is that while the State Troopers seem to have a higher level of training, when approaching a vehicle local PD will often just run up on all sides with guns out. So, you hear a lot of "watch the crossfire!" from the troopers. On the side of the road bystanders are rarely a hazard, but the same lack of positioning would surely be a hazard to bystanders in different circumstances. So yes i definitely I agree that police officers need more situational awareness training before they can use lethal force- especially in somewhere as packed as a subway station.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 2 months ago

More training won't help. US cops are trained to aggressively protect their own, individual safety above all else, and are trained specifically that everyone and everything is a threat to them. The result is they're terrified of everything and everyone, and are encouraged to shoot first.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
397 points (99.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
1919 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS