125
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 102 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is the stupidest fucking thing a union could do because it's going to cause internal conflict and deter people from wanting to work with teamsters. It could even deter people from joining it.

I wouldn't want to join a union if I knew 60% of the membership were fucking tories.

[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 47 points 2 months ago

The Maoist Communist Union is like “if we just organize the teamsters” and as a member I’m just shaking my head.

These drivers are gonna make up the brown shirts.

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 35 points 2 months ago

When I heard that guy on Rev Left radio say that I nearly burst out laughing. The understanding most leftists have of the labor movement is pathetic.

[-] Bloobish@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the labor standards that existed in the pre 2000s are vastly different to how divided and diverse labor is today. There is a clear divide in labor between what one would see as "youth labor" not highschoolers but younger people working in non traditional labor settings (Starbucks, Whole Foods, Amazon, etc), these individuals are most commonly politically opposed to the usual political leanings of "older insular labor" these are the old unions filled with mainly male workers (commonly older and conservative) who have at best "traditional democratic" values and at worst are chuds in everything but name. The Teamsters, though they may have younger members, are a traditionally male and older worker union that sadly has a lot of trappings preserved from the 1960s-70s with no clear coherent understanding or unwillingness to understand historically what has been done to labor unions over the last four decades (or they just don't give a shit).

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

If we elect Frank Sobotka to get them to start dredging by the old grain pier, well be back on top

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt for thinking of a plan to have a successful revolution in America, but winning over the teamsters to help form a vanguard party (especially on the ideas of internationalism) to me feels as fantastical as a communist winning the presidency and dismantling the empire from the inside.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Chuds aren't exactly known to be smart.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 months ago

recently quit my union because it was sending money directly to labour (UK) and they advocated for a 3.6% wage increase this year.

I quit and explained my rents going up by 12%, my bills by more and that they should be ashamed for accepting the lies labour told them that there 'is simply not any money'

The other union that represents my interests just voted to strike instead, guess where im going

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

The other union that represents my interests just voted to strike instead, guess where im going

hell yeah

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 months ago
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago

The end of that basically says "Harris is better but we're afraid of upsetting our members so no endorsement".

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 months ago

I totally agree. This seems like an "uh, oh, we fucked up. How do we reverse this?" kind of decision after posting their polling results on Twitter.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Really shouldn't have posted results, or polled at all. That information is only likely to make workers less likely to join, whether it leans one way or another it's likely to make the other side less likely to join. I would not join a union that is full of tories, full stop, I know most well-meaning libs that support labour wouldn't either. But I also know that tories wouldn't join a union if they knew it was like all lefties or whatever.

It's just not a good way to organise. It's publishing information that you know will cause division.

[-] RuthlessCriticism@hexbear.net 75 points 2 months ago

I'm hearing that AOC is endorsing Trump, it's what the unions wanted her to do.

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 56 points 2 months ago

This is a result of a political system that only allows dissent against the neoliberal economic order to be amplified if it’s crouched in ethno-nationalist terms.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

You just summed up my problem with Skyrim

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

michael-laugh its true. The Stormcloaks are an op - Ulfric is a Thalmor intelligence assset. illuminati the Jarls don't want you to know. Wake up sheeple!

[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 47 points 2 months ago

I’m a teamster (non driver) and I don’t participate at all because it’s literally the worst people among us. They would probably kill a stranger for an extra 5k when they already make 150,000k plus. Life is a hustle in their eyes and if you aren’t, you deserve death. I’m not joking

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

Wait, are you saying the teamsters are all grindset bros?

[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 33 points 2 months ago

A slight majority of rank and file drivers in my local have attempted to vote for a local president that would liquidate non drivers as members, because the drivers think unskilled labor deserves to be min wage and unprotected, and they feel embarrassed to share a room with us at meetings.

[-] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 29 points 2 months ago

unskilled labor

they drive trucks, lol 🙄

[-] miz@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

look it takes a lot of skill to make that "beep beep" noise consistently when you are in reverse

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

Makes sense. If they hustle at the factories hard enough for 7 years you can become a coveted delivery driver

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 44 points 2 months ago

Interesting that the strawpolls at the meetings hours one way while the phone survey goes another. Seems like there's a correlation between how active the members are and their likelihood to vote Republican

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe I'm too woke but I'm pretty sure it's because Harris is black, Indian, and a women that the results flipped so hard

Union members aren't all far left on average or anything. Cops have and support their unions

Joining a union directly and clearly improves their own situation. Can the said be said for having a black, indian women be president for the white and/or male union members?

Are you confident there is a complete insignificant number of teamster members that have no racial biases at all? And that they all believe women as just as capable leaders?

[-] christian@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Are you confident there is a complete insignificant number of teamster members that have no racial biases at all? And that they all believe women as just as capable leaders?

I strongly suspect that a very high percentage of the members that would flip when their candidate turns out to be a woman and/or minority were already solidly in the Trump camp even when Biden was running. I really do not believe that 40% of the teamsters currently in favor of Trump preferred another option before the democratic candidate was changed to a minority woman.

Not identical, but I don't think I've encountered anyone IRL who thinks more highly of Biden than of Obama without loathing Biden.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Fair enough, but the perception of black women is a far fall down from black men in America tbh

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

I'm not saying that being an active union member makes you totally leftist, but it's clear from these polls that the mood of the halls is different from the mood of the general membership in some measurable way.

Like where I'm at, the Teamsters and IBEW share their halls with DSA, PSL, and SRA. The average member of those unions is pretty centrist, but the leadership and active membership is very leftist.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

These polls don't say anything about the mood because the candidates to vote for are different

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 42 points 2 months ago

I don't understand why unions feel the need to endorse candidates in bourgeois elections.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It makes sense for a union to say "this candidate is better for our workers". They're not revolutionary parties.

It makes no sense for a union to have the members decide that rather than the union leadership fully immersed in working out which is best.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

On the other hand, leaving political matters exclusively to the leadership is a sure way to get a yellow union.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

Because they're not revolutionary, they are the wage treats on leashes. They're lead gets a little longer to placate the workers. It'll get shorter when they've become to self important.

I haven't done this analysis my self but I have a hunch labor was far more militant before the creation of the DOL, and far less after. I would wager a bet that labor made more gains on national labor laws before the DOL then after.

Roughly, what I've heard is that they made gains under the NLRB regime of the Wagner Act but, at the price of having that be dependent on the state, which has the power to certify and decertify unions. The period of significant gains was short, lasting from the mid 30s to Taft Hartley. Then you had the post war labor compact, which lasted until the profitability crisis of the 70s made capital take away the seat they gave labor at the table to help recoup profitability.

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

the red scares (in the 1910s and 20s, and in mccarthy era, but also it never really ends) directly explicitly criminalized communism and being a communist, and forced the purges of communists and anarchists from the ranks and board of every union, every civil rights organization, every school faculty and schoolboard, every local government position, and even in media and entertainment; purging any and all militance. The DoL makes deals with liberal remnants who agreed to purge the communists, and the ones that didn't were maligned, marginalized, criminalized, punished, arrested, crushed. This predictably left in its wake in the unions complacency, class collaboration, and corruption, which is why organized crime cozied up alongside the more unsavory class collaborators starting in the 50s, which added to the reactionary politics.

Any time any class consciousness and obstructive action raised its head, they were crushed. Reagan crushing the airline union and thatcher the miners unions was the death knell and last gasp of the any old unions' agency in working class struggle. these labor unions being what they are now is much more a legacy of all of that than anything else. Now the only good unions are the independent ones and militant dual-carding ones like the IWW. Teamsters aren't even the worst. The AFL-CIA--er I mean AFL-CIO literally flew to LatAm and Europe, most impactfully to Brazil and Poland to train their reactionary unions to undermine communism (including Poland's infamous Solidarnosc).

You also still have to fill out forms that ask if you're a communist or are/have been a member of a communist party for many governmental forms. Even citizenship applications. you can be denied for being a communist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JealousCactus@hexbear.net 37 points 2 months ago

As much as I dislike how unions bow before Democrats for crumbs, you gotta be a special kind of dumb to support Republicans. At least Biden staffed the NLRB. I'm not expecting the PRO Act or Card Check to happen under Harris, but come on.

[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

liberals enraged that workers are not organizing for the purpose of more effectively propping up the democrats

or

organized settler labor aligns with conservatives in dispute between liberal and conservative wings of settler politics

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

That difference between Biden-Trump and Trump-Harris is crazy though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fuck Biden, but I can understand why a union member would think he’s pro labor. His reputation doesn’t really involve labor in either way. But, before Trump was president, the number 1 reason why people liked him because he was a piece of shit who cheats, cons, and lies. He was the people’s asshole because his whole demeanor was cartoonish enough for people to not believe he was a real human being. Why would you believe someone with this reputation will help you lmao

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

Not surprising at all. Blue collar workers tend to lean right-wing in the US.

[-] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Anti organising wreckers? visible-disgust

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of what Micheal Brook said about global north workers in his video on wallerstein’s world theory

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

So surly and lazy

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
125 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13546 readers
1014 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS