255
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 143 points 1 month ago

Until I hear that they have dumped the requirement to log into Ubisoft Connect or Uplay or whatever they are calling it noe, then Ubisoft will remain dead to me.

Makes me sad. I really enjoyed the Assassin's Creed series and have waited for Shadows for what feels like a decade now.

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That plus resigning the same game every few months

Fucking auto correct

Resigning should be releasing.

Apologies alll

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cmrn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Every time I go to play an old Ubisoft game I get to some stage in launching where I remember “oh right this is why I stopped bothering to play”

[-] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Especially painful on steam deck. If you get it working, it adds a good minute to the launch time

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Considering the president that rocket league set, I would agree.

[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago

Despite the best efforts of major publishers including Activision, Electronic Arts, Rockstar, Bethesda, and others, not to mention the far better deal offered to developers by Epic, Steam is more dominant than ever—and in the end, they all came crawlin' back.

They're all crawling back because they did not give it their best effort. They just wanted the full 100% of the sale revenue without doing the hard parts. To be fair to EA, for the first few years, it looked like they were actually going to try.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago

its more or less that yes. they saw the money but not the time and effort to get users to use your platform.

and its not like impossible, as long as you can create games people will play and stay at itll work (e.g Riot), but they legit put such little effort in the launchers that it was creating a negative user experience, and never put in the money to make it better.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Yep same thing with all the streaming services, just taking the Netflix money was probably a better move for a lot of these services.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Eh, it's so easy to hop between streaming services that I don't have the same hangup there. You subscribe for a month, watch what you want to watch, cancel, and then go to the next one. You can always resubscribe later. When you buy a game on a given storefront, you're stuck with their feature set forever.

[-] exu@feditown.com 8 points 1 month ago

As a user there simply was/is no incentive to use other stores when the game is the same price. There has to be a reason for me to buy somewhere else.

[-] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

As much as I agree the 30% cut can be a bit steep, I do appreciate that part of it is going into ongoing R&D like Steam Deck and Proton benefiting the whole gaming industry. I'd like to think of it like Valve are investing into PC innovation similarly to the way Playstation, Xbox and Nintendo do for their new consoles.

[-] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

But unlike valve the console R&D is limited to the consoles themselves. Valve is working to improve gaming for Linux in general and foster a more open and consumer friendly console system.

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

If you have to choose an evil monopoly hell bent on world domination and bloodshed you might as well choose steam at least they are owned by a private individual instead of a hive mind distilled from the pure greed of capitalism.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

Doesn't matter if the game is on Steam or on Epic if it's a shit game.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, I bought FC5 for 10. It was still a rip off, but put that shit on sale and make something back.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

Ubi actually makes some great games. Give Anno 1800 a shot.

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

When you make a trash launcher, people tend to ignore it. Who knew?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

You could create the best launcher in the world and people would ignore it because they don't want multiple launchers and their library is already centralized on Steam.

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I'm starting to build up my GOG library quite a bit, and that launcher in its current state is still better than Ubisoft Connect.

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I feel like both ubi and gog launchers are basically unusable. I have no idea why gog doesn't fix their shit

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe.

But until there's an alternative that isn't outright disrespectful with how complete and utter dogshit it is it's hard to say that for sure.

Inertia matters. But so does the fact that no one has bothered putting the work in to not be a trainwreck.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 34 points 1 month ago
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 18 points 1 month ago

Guillemot said the same thing in a subsequent trading update call with analysts.

So stockholders demanded it lol

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I'm really starting to worry about steam. There aren't any good alternatives that seem to be hitting mainstream. Not to mention every now and then the shop gets ever so slightly worse and more spammy looking. Steam was a god send when it first launched and I'd hate to see it become what it replaced

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Im not sure what you mean.

Itch.io and GOG are great alternatives.

[-] style99@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

GOG is awesome. I only get games from them.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

Not to mention every now and then the shop gets ever so slightly worse and more spammy looking. Steam was a god send when it first launched and I'd hate to see it become what it replaced

Was it a godsend? I thought everybody hated it initially. And I feel like it's only got better over the years as they've added more features.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

there are alternatives, but when you take shitty games (at least crippled games) and pack them into another client that also requires you to sign up, again, is it worth the effort? the games aren't worth at that point in my opinion.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
255 points (98.1% liked)

Games

32664 readers
1151 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS