104
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

And yet Johnson say's there's no way to estimate losses before the new administration is in place...

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he won’t call Congress back into session early to fast-track emergency funding for hurricane victims, arguing that there’s no rush since “it takes a while to calculate the actual damages.”

https://lemmy.world/post/20616122

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-johnson-congress-wont-vote-early-hurricane-relief_n_6703e86fe4b097cbbcb61d21

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago

That was after Helene. Is an exact amount really necessary when it's obvious places and people are GONE?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pay no attention to the US consistently smashing new fossil fuel production records since the last decade...

If we cut fossil fuel subsidies, billionaires would have slightly less money! Obviously neither political party could allow that. We dont even have a viable candidate this election who's not pro-fracking.

Even tho in coal friendly battleground states like Pennsylvania, 58% support banning it.

Pennsylvania voters continue to be split over fracking. A poll out this week, which surveyed 700 likely voters in September, shows 58% support a ban on fracking while 42% oppose it.

https://whyy.org/articles/pennsylvania-voters-fracking-survey-regulations/

But as long as both candidates agree. It literally doesn't matter what voters want on the issue.

So we'll keep destroying the environment and causing climate change to accelerate then act shocked when every year extreme weather events get worse.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

CO2 emissions in the US peaked in 2008 and have been declining since. I'd prefer it decline faster, but we're moving in the right direction.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/183943/us-carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-1999/

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Wild idea: in certain situations corporate institutions are legally handled as individuals. Climate change and it's effects have been scientifically and undeniably linked to hightened CO2 emissions. We have stats that corporations are the root cause for like 70% of those emissions. On those grounds, shouldn't it be possible for insurance companies, that have to pay a good chunk of those damages, to go after the main guilty parties? Let the corpos battle it out.

[-] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Let DeSantis figure it out. Fuck that fascist goat fucker.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Ron will be just fine. He's a multimillionaire. It's all of the poor people who will suffer.

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Don’t forget, Florida doesn’t need any federal help because the governor is afraid it might be politically motivated.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

And their shitty governor is refusing coordination with the White House. GOP is a disease.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
104 points (95.6% liked)

News

23622 readers
4833 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS