261

Today is just the third day of early in person voting and it's already at ~20% of the entire 2020 vote (both early and on election day)

Make sure to get out and vote!

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Do we have any idea which direction these votes are going? Are there early voting exit polls? Yes, I know recent trends point to blue early voting, but that's no guarantee.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

They don't release exit polling until after polls close on election day

There is not direct data on who they are voting for, only demographic data. For instance, you can see that currently around 55% of early voters in Georgia are women. In some states you can also look at party registration but that doesn't tell you everything (people often don't update it) and a large chunk are not registered, but that can get you a good idea

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Thank you, all great points. So overall, what do the demographics suggest in this case?

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

General consesus seems to be the early vote data looks good for dems overall. Some suggest that there maybe a slight increase in republicans switching from election day voting to early, but otherwise looks pretty good. Honestly would have expected more of that given that republicans theoretically made it a focus of their get out the vote to get people to vote earlier

Analyzing early voting data can be a little tricky because of you can only look at those indirect metrics. I mean even with party registration it doesn't tell you if republicans are choosing not to vote for trump which the republican oversampling polling suggests we might see more of compared to 2020

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

The dems don’t have this in the bag, though. Wins and losses may be decided by a few thousand votes, so people need to get out and vote!

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I really appreciate the indepth response. Thanks much.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago

C'mon america,.dont be the guy who says 'oh, a million already? I can sit this one out, then' and then watch the orange turd get his second term and pardon himself with the help of his SC buddies.

Get. Out. And. Vote.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 13 points 12 hours ago

My wife and I will get our GA votes for Kamala in next week.

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 90 points 1 day ago

I truly hope the good people of Georgia haven’t forgotten that Donald Trump attempted to steal their votes from them in 2020, and I hope they understand he is going to try to do it again if it’s anything short of a Harris/Walz blowout.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Oh he'll try doing something like that again, regardless the raw voter counts and the candidate percentages. If it's close he and his followers will through a hissy fit and the bullshit conspiracy theories about vote fraud will kick off again. If Harris wins by 10+% they will throw a hissy fit and start with a slightly different set of bullshit conspiracy theories. But I get what you're saying: the latter scenario is easier to handle.

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 day ago

I had to wait an hour to vote today in my area with a relatively small population (NW area of GA). That's never happened before, at least not with early voting.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago

Were there any aggressive/scary poll watchers?

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 13 hours ago

No. There was a tiny old woman that was just sitting there silently though.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago

Silently judging you 😑

[-] hydroxycotton@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I assume you are in the Dalton area? Maybe Trenton? No need to answer, it's just interesting to see a fellow lemmyite from the same general region. I'm in the Chattanooga area and have heard similar things. These wait times seem odd this early, but I'm really happy it seems early voting turnout seems to be exceptionally healthy so far.

[-] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I think we're called Lemmings

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not that far north, but yeah. It is highly unusual.

[-] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

1 million early is huge when you realize the 2020 numbers:

Biden - 2,473,633
Trump - 2,461,854

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago
[-] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 52 minutes ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

We made a serious error in judgement today... My wife volunteered to deliver 250 election flyers for the local Democratic party.

So I was like "Cool, I'll drive and do security."

We got about, I dunno, 15 houses in and she's like "I can't do this by myself!"

Fine, I didn't volunteer, but I have an electric wheelchair, I'll help.

2 apartment complexes later and we are WIPED.

I think maybe we hit 50 or 60 out of 250? We're just destroyed. LOL.

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Why does anybody wait for the final day?

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

I recently learned Alabama doesn’t have early voting.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

A lot of states require you to have "reasons" to vote early and apply for it, so all you can do is wait for election day.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

I do because early voting is across town whereas I can walk up the street to vote on election day.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago

They increasingly don't, but the tradition was really baked in until covid.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

1 million in just 3 days of early voting. And that's including today which is still ongoing

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

cool, more votes usually benefits democrats, despite from the strict mathematics/statistics point of view, doesn't make much sense

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Well, when you've got people like Trump saying that mail-in voting is fraud, there are going to be some percentage of republicans who take that seriously and won't do a mail-in ballot and will vote in person on election day every time.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It makes sense because the people who always vote (retirees with few-to-no hobbies) are overwhelmingly republican.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago

It's increasingly the case that the reliable vote is blue due to the realignment of educated people from red to blue. College educated people are super reliable voters.

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Come on now, rage-viewing Fox Entertainment ~~News~~ and posting racial slurs to strangers on Twitter counts as a hobby, doesn't it?

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was going to say no hobbies, originally, then I remembered those.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Are there any polls of these early votes? Is it tracking higher than 2020, which in itself was a very high amount of votes? I wonder if that is a good thing.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tracking higher than 2020 numbers in many states. In Georgia, this year's first day early voting turnout (~310k) was over double the 2020 first day early voting (~135k).

Keep in mind that COVID changed voting patterns in 2020 so comparisons can be funky. Even still 2020 had higher early voting turnout (especially by mail) than we had historically seen, so being on track for higher early turnout is great to see

Early voting has historically been heavy in dem's favor and polling on voting prefering suggest that this has not changed all that much. There is a strong partisian divide in voting early vs election day

Exit polling data (asking people who they voted for) is not released until after polls close on election day

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Are there mail vote numbers yet? Possibly those who voted by mail last time are just doing it in person now.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.ajc.com/politics/election/georgia-passes-1-million-vote-mark/KNMH3BTAJNELXJW7SYVZPZ34CU/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
261 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS