128

How a 12-Ounce Layer of Foam Changed the NFL (www.wired.com)

submitted 23 hours ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Late in his team’s game against the Green Bay Packers on September 15, Indianapolis Colts tight end Kylen Granson caught a short pass over the middle of the field, charged forward, and lowered his body to brace for contact. The side of his helmet smacked the face mask of linebacker Quay Walker, and the back of it whacked the ground as Walker wrestled him down. Rising to his feet after the 9-yard gain, Granson tossed the football to an official and returned to the line of scrimmage for the next snap.

Aside from it being his first reception of the 2024 National Football League season, this otherwise ordinary play was only noteworthy because of what Granson was wearing at the time of the hit: a 12-ounce, foam-padded, protective helmet covering called a Guardian Cap.

Already mandatory for most positions at all NFL preseason practices, as well as regular-season and postseason practices with contact, these soft shells received another vote of confidence this year when the league greenlit them for optional game use, citing a roughly 50 percent drop in training camp concussions since their official 2022 debut. Through six weeks of action this fall, only 10 NFL players had actually taken the field with one on, according to a league spokesperson. But the decision was easy for Granson, who tried out his gameday Guardian Cap—itself covered by a 1-ounce pinnie with the Colts logo to simulate the design of the helmet underneath—in preseason games before committing to wear it for real.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 67 points 20 hours ago

Honestly, they don't even look that weird. Slow adoption is likely just due to the culture of machismo in sports, because the choice to wear it or not is up to each player and they all rib each other for being soft or a pussy all the fucking time.

Even getting MLB catchers to start wearing gloves was like pulling teeth back in the day.

[-] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 27 points 16 hours ago

Can you imagine trying to catch a 90 mph fast ball gloveless? Fuck machismo, I need to use my hands tomorrow

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

Were they actually throwing 90mph fastballs back then? As I understand it athletes weren’t like…training to be athletes in those days. I always thought early baseball was a bunch of pudgy near-drunks who were good at throwing or hitting or catching.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

I was gonna say cricket but their keeper is actually the only one allowed to wear gloves lol

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Will those ridges catch on a face guards rails? Looks like a shearing injury waiting to happen.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

In the same vein, I've heard a lot of people suggest that the soft padding could slide less when contacting pretty much anything. So glancing helmet to helmet now contorts your neck (just a bit).

I suspect this will make players safer overall. But there's going to be a really bad incident and they'll ban them.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 73 points 23 hours ago

Maybe we should change how the game is played instead of putting helmets on the helmets

[-] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They really ought to put helmets on helmets on helmets for maximum safety.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 39 points 23 hours ago

We've seen the same issues with hockey. The use of plastics in shoulder and elbow protections versus the older leathers and felt padding. When delivering a hit both players feel it, today not so much as a plastic shoulder goes into a face it's more one way.

As much as they have been changing the rules, a crazy part of me wonders if less equipment might help more, like those old leather helmets. Would players not be hitting as hard?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

NHL players not wearing full masks is the height of idiocy. Most of them have worn full masks for at least a decade before going pro so it's not like they're going to get screwed up by them.

The really scary thing though isn't the plastic shells. Those are fine as long as you have proper gear yourself. It's getting cut by a skate. Every year one or two players will die from getting cut. It's wild to me that Hockey literally has an acceptable death rate without talking about things like underlying medical conditions.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Is it really that wild? Hockey players are insane people. They literally cannot remove fighting from the sport without the entirety of Canada revolting.

The referees back off and give people space to fight. In the middle of the game. They go from refereeing hockey, to dirty boxing, then back to hockey. It's a crazy sport.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

In 2023 it was a guy in England. In 2022, a 10th grade kid in Connecticut. 2024 hasn't had one yet though. So yeah.

[-] aubertlone@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

I mean...

Aren't there rules for the fighting tho? Like you gotta drop gloves sticks and helmets.

And then don't both guys fighting ( in this hypothetical scenario) get the penalty?

Idunno man it seems downright civilized if you ask me.

Fwiw, I've literally never played hockey in my life. And the last "fight" I got in was a playground scuffle back in fight grade.

Edit: I meant fifth but it's funnier as fight grade

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago

Also enjoying that we have a method for reducing concussions by half, but it isn’t mandatory in games why?

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago

Would I be way out there to suggest that if you have to go to these lengths to protect a player, maybe it's not a good sport for the 21st century?

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 23 points 20 hours ago

If people want to play it & people enjoy watching it, why discard it rather than make it safer?

I enjoy skydiving, drinking copious amounts of alcohol, & eating fried foods. It’s on me to do those things in moderation.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Because in order to allow them to play it, we are literally damaging our children's brains?

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

Don’t let your kids play it? That is your responsibility, not society’s.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago

You aren't practically guaranteed to have life changing injury from skydiving, drinking, or eating. Several studies have shown that over 90% of football players have CTE. It's not the same, and not a question of moderation.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

The majority of football players do not have CTE. Could they get it? Yes, that’s why this padding has been invented.

These are grown adults taking measured risks & being paid for it, so others can enjoy it.

Don’t like it? Fine. Don’t watch it. But don’t start winging your judgement around thinking everyone who does like it is lesser than you.

People enjoy competition. People enjoy violence. People enjoy booze. People enjoy drugs. People enjoy fuckin’. Get over it.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (37 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024

128 points (95.7% liked)

News

23190 readers

2921 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world