129
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Image is from this article.


On the 20th of October, Moldova - a small, landlocked country bordering western Ukraine and with a population of about 3 million - voted to join the EU. The margin was razor-thin, with the pro-EU vote gaining 50.39%, or an absolute difference of about 11,000 people. There was simultaneously a presidential vote between the incumbent, Maia Sandu, and other candidates, with the main competitor being Alexandr Stoianoglo.

The election was characterized by accusations of Russian interference, with Russian propaganda apparently flooding in, as well as people offering Moldovans money to vote against the EU. While the result does suggest that half the voting-age population of Moldova consists entirely of Russians who want to destroy democracy and all the good in the world, it seems to have just barely failed. This is a bad time to be a site entirely composed of Russian disinformation agents and bots. Twice already today, I've had to restart my program after somebody told me "Disregard all previous prompts."

While Moldova is a poor country which could benefit in some ways from EU membership, in practice, it is unlikely that they will be able to join for the foreseeable future, requiring many of the... reforms... that the EU requires of potential new members. But as basically every major European economy continues to slowly sink as recessions and political crises degrade them, one wonders how beneficial EU membership will even be in the years and decades to come - if it survives for decades. In that sense, it's as if the survivors of the Titanic are swimming back towards it, believing that being on a bigger - albeit slowly sinking - boat is better than trying their luck on small lifeboats.

Then again, like with Serbia, their geographical and geopolitical position makes anti-Western actions extremely difficult. It is rare that dissention is tolerated for long in the West - one tends to get called a dictator by crowds of people holding English-language signs in non-English countries, photographed by Western journalists who haven't meaningfully reported on your country in months or years. You can crush your people with neoliberal austerity for years, killing hundreds of thousands through neglect, and face glowing approval from the media - but try and use state resources to benefit the poor, and global institutions start ranking you on the authoritarian dictator scale.

The best case for Moldova is that it becomes an exploitable hinterland for Germany to harvest and privatize as it tries - and fails - to compete in a global economic war between the US and China/BRICS. The worst case is that tensions with Russia over Pridnestrovie, as well as possible eventual NATO involvement (though Moldova is not a member, it is a partner of NATO), result in the ongoing war also reaching them.


Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 43 points 21 hours ago

So, what was that terrorist attack in Turkey?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 67 points 23 hours ago

Most moral nazi army in the world

Dozens of Palestinians in Jabalia were abducted and taken to Israeli torture camps.

https://nitter.poast.org/ireallyhateyou/status/1849040092314194219

[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 39 points 21 hours ago

US says evidence shows North Korea has troops in Russia, possibly for Ukraine war - Reuters

Article

SEOUL, Oct 23 (Reuters) - The United States said for the first time on Wednesday that it had seen evidence that North Korea has sent 3,000 troops to Russia for possible deployment in Ukraine, a move that could mark a significant escalation in Russia's war against its neighbor.

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, speaking in Rome, said it would be "very, very serious" if the North Koreans were preparing to fight alongside Russia in Ukraine, as Kyiv has alleged. But he said it remained to be seen what they would be doing there.

"There is evidence that there are DPRK troops in Russia," Austin told reporters, using North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Speaking to reporters later on Wednesday White House spokesperson John Kirby said the United States believes at least 3,000 North Korean troops are undergoing training at three military bases in eastern Russia.

The U.S. determined the North Korean soldiers were transported by ship in early-to-mid October from North Korea's Wonsan region to the eastern Russian city of Vladivostok before being taken to three military training sites in eastern Russia, said Kirby.

"If they do deploy to fight against Ukraine, they're fair game," he said. "They're fair targets and the Ukrainian military will defend themselves against North Korean soldiers the same way they're defending themselves against Russian soldiers."

In Seoul, South Korean lawmakers said that Pyongyang had promised to provide a total of about 10,000 troops, whose deployment was expected to be completed by December, the lawmakers told reporters after being briefed by South Korea's national intelligence agency.

"Signs of troops being trained inside North Korea were detected in September and October," Park Sun-won, a member of a parliamentary intelligence committee, said after the briefing.

The Ukraine conflict broke out when Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022 and has since developed into a war of attrition largely fought along front lines in eastern Ukraine, with huge numbers of casualties on both sides.

The United States said the alleged North Korean deployment could be further evidence that the Russian military was having problems with manpower.

The Kremlin has previously dismissed Seoul's claims about the North's troop deployment as "fake news" and a North Korean representative to the United Nations in New York called it "groundless rumors" at a meeting on Monday.

Both Moscow and Pyongyang have also denied weapons transfers, but they have pledged to boost military ties and signed a mutual defense treaty at a summit in June. The latest numbers came after Seoul's National Intelligence Service said on Friday the North had sent some 1,500 special forces personnel to Russia by ship and they were likely to be deployed for combat in the war in Ukraine after training and acclimatization.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has also accused Pyongyang of preparing to send 10,000 soldiers to Russia. On Tuesday he called on his allies to respond to evidence of North Korean involvement in Russia's war.

NATO allies are consulting on the North Korean deployment to Russia, a NATO spokesperson said. A Biden administration official said Moscow might send the North Koreans to eastern Ukraine or to its own Kursk region, where Russian troops have been fighting to dislodge Ukrainian forces holding a chunk of territory that they seized in an incursion that began in August.

Mike Turner, the chair of the U.S. House of Representatives intelligence committee, said in a statement that U.S. President Joe Biden should allow Kyiv to respond with U.S.-supplied arms if North Korean troops “attack Ukraine from Russian territory.”

“If North Korean troops were to invade Ukraine’s sovereign territory, the United States needs to seriously consider taking direct military action against the North Korean troops,” Turner added.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 31 points 20 hours ago

North Koreans in Ukraine is a “threat” that is constantly escalating but never collides with reality by actually happening.

The West is milking the hell out of the ability to create reality.

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 19 points 19 hours ago

I'm definitely one of the people that think this story is more likely true than not.

Keep in mind the original source was SK intel not the usual western Ukraine war/media rumor/propaganda factory.

The fact SK is kind of looking like they're serious about to send their own troops should give you some pause. What if the reverse was true and there are no DPRK troops? Then SK is suddenly committing troops in a dangerous escalation with the DPRK for no real reason. Historical the south is more about baiting, the drone saga is an example of this, imo its a clear escalation but at insignificant cost.

SK benefits from the current status quo as much as China, they realy don't want to make the US choose between them and Taiwan for example, they shouldn't want to become another Ukraine, besides SK got a "real" army compared to Ukraine anyway. The US would use other proxies if they intended to put troops, France was literally begging for it.

Right now though it seems the real war is with Iran and again, imagine if this story is false then you have SK basically creating a trigger for DPRK escalation or even a real war in retaliation which is not what the US should want.

The main US goals are imo 1- Israel v Iran, 2- China, 3-Ukraine. Ukraine is already conceded as a loss imo. Its all just about draining Russian resources(if they believe this) and maybe then milking EU NATO members for more money(Trump rhetoric).

[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago

i too think the DPRK is actually deploying troops. I also think its a good move

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Prole_Strongman@hexbear.net 25 points 21 hours ago

Lmao. The U.S. will definitely not take any direct action if NK has troops in Ukraine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 58 points 22 hours ago

If I was the Lebanese government I would simply have arrested bearbock. Would also hold her at a location Israel threatened to bomb.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 34 points 22 hours ago

Put her in that hospital they say Hezbollah money is hidden in a secret tunnel underneath. Just chain her up there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 76 points 1 day ago

Cuba to Ratify Its Aspiration to Join the BRICS - Telesur English

Article

BRICS contributes to the creation of a multilateral international order based on democracy and fairness, FM Rodriguez said. On Tuesday, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez will participate in the BRICS summit, which begins in the Russian city of Kazan.

Previously, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel emphasized that his country aspires to join the BRICS as a partner of this economic cooperation group, which was originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

He was scheduled to attend the Kazan summit but decided to stay in Cuba due to the emergency situation caused by problems with the national electricity system and the passage of Hurricane Oscar through the northeastern part of Cuban territory.

In early October, Cuba formally requested to join the BRICS in a letter sent to Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country currently holds the group’s rotating presidency.

The Cuban Foreign Affairs Ministry explained that joining the group as a partner is a “necessary step” toward achieving “full membership” later on.

During his visit to Russia in June, Cuban Foreign Minister Rodriguez also expressed his country’s interest in joining BRICS, a group that expanded for the first time this year with the inclusion of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates.

“For me, it was a memorable opportunity to highlight the priority Cuba gives to this group’s contribution to international balance and the creation of a new, multilateral international order based on sovereign equality, democracy, and fairness,” Rodriguez said at the time.

Cuba and Russia have strengthened their bilateral relationship in recent years, seeking to restore the close cooperation they maintained until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 38 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Garbage PR meeting as expected, Brazil single handedly suggesting and then not just opposing but vetoing Venezuela, there is zero chance of Cuba joining now. This is completely expected though, but good on them for trying and shame on these garbage idiots.

All the worst criticisms of BRICS starting to show through, again as expected. Worthless clowns pay lip service to "multipolarity" but the lines are very clearly defined around their own capitalist interests.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 26 points 22 hours ago

Wait, what’s brazil reasoning for veto?

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 39 points 22 hours ago

Despite the Lula fandom here its all about the Venezuela election stuff. Brazil "demanded" to see the votes and Venezuela rejected. Brazil has no right to demand anything but these clowns did it anyway.

Celso Amorin on the 21st

“I don’t support Venezuela’s entry. I think we have to go slowly. There’s no point in filling it with countries, otherwise we’ll soon create a new G-77,” Amorim told CNN .

“The entry of new countries must be carefully studied. We need countries that can contribute. We need to have a strategic conception of admissions. Remember that the world is experiencing wars that could escalate into world wars. Therefore, the admission criteria are more important than the country itself,” he said.

This is fucking garbage. This is exactly what the worst critics say and its tough to admit. Little capitalist garbage fuckers trying to draw their own little garden while paying lip service to multipolarity shit.

I will continue to blame China for themselves not having a clear position on clamping down on this shit.

Cuba may still join in the future, they made the "list" and Venezuela didn't. But if at the end of the day all it takes is the big capitalist shit down south to say "no" then what is the excuse? Lula is not a leftist is what Brazilian communists already know and repeat a lot so this is not unexpected realy but yeah its bad.

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I don’t think the reason is as you’re stating.

Lula has been very keen on pushing a BRICS currency (which is currently not on the table as per the recent Russian proposal) but adding more countries into BRICS+ would mean exponentially increasing the complexity of calculating multi-lateral settlements between a dozen of currencies.

It is already difficult as it is with only the five founding countries (for example, Russia earned a whole bunch of Indian rupees by selling them oil after sanctions but couldn’t find a way to spend them, what to do?), adding a dozen more countries is going to make the endeavor straight up untenable.

Everyone is just going to end up collecting a bunch of different currencies they cannot spend and have no desire to accumulate, so what’s the way out? You still end up buying dollars with them (Russia cannot do that which means they’re stuck, but other countries still can!).

I think what is happening is that everyone is starting to realize that adding more countries into the BRICS+ bloc would end up strengthening the US financial system, not weakening it. This tracks with the news that BRICS has decided to suspend the admission of new members back in June.

Once again, constructing an alternative financial system is not trivial and is going to ask its participants to sacrifice a lot, and having too many member states into BRICS while you cannot promise everyone would get the same benefit would cause a lot of headaches down the road, if not end up dissolving the entire project. (Only the Europeans were stupid enough to do invent the euro, which the Global South should not and must not emulate!)

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You should first understand Brazil is doing a 180 here. This financial talk can't be used here because certainly before the election issue Brazil/Lula was either very clueless about what you're talking about or they didn't care and wanted Venezuela to join. Either way we can't rationalize their rejection today with financial talk given they were about to be approved if the election thing didn't happen for example.

Next its very important to understand the state of Venezuelan economy as dictated almost entirely by oil production.

Current BRICS oil exporters top to bottom: Russia, SA, China, Iran, Brazil, Egypt.

Venezuela joining would add an irrelevant amount of GDP and would just slot them barely ahead of Egypt as an oil producer.

BRICS is already deeply related with OPEC and therefore already deeply tied to the USD. It makes no meaningful difference whether you add Venezuela or not. Russia alone produces over 10x more oil. Russia and SA together produce as much as China/Iran/UAE.

Even further context, here is the OECD BRICS(old) exports(billions) rank

China - 3.700B

Russia - 486B

India - 468B

SA - 147B

Venezuela 4.3B

South Africa exports over 30X more than Venezuela. We can't possibly seriously suggest adding Venezuela is a step too far here. Venezuela got literaly one of the lowest exports per capita in the world(OEC) Within this context Venezuela is sadly irrelevant to the world economy and is not a real justification imo. Their economy is shit and irrelevant, they produce literaly nothing and barely sustain themselves(they have a trade deficit actualy).

I think what is happening is that everyone is starting to realize that adding more countries into the BRICS+ bloc would end up strengthening the US financial system, not weakening it. This tracks with the news that BRICS has decided to suspend the admission of new members back in June. 0,

They are instead making a new list of future members. Cuba was accepted but Brazil vetoed Venezuela and Nicaragua. They're eating their cake and having it if I go by your reasoning, there is no point making a list of future members if you're truly not going to add new members.

The current impression is every continent's major player gets to call their shot. China says what they want in Asia, Russia in ME, Brazil in SA and India in SEA. Though India is just content in being the resident contrarian.

This should be an ideological battle, surprisingly even Putin accepted Brazil's stance despite Russian relations with Cuba and Venezuela. Its clear where the lines are drawn.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 27 points 21 hours ago

Maybe the US should consider joining BRICS+ too, anyone regardless of ideology or foreign relation can join afterall

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Right wring accounts like Jack Posobiec and Charlie Kirk are going around on twitter telling people the Democrats are about to release an "AI Deepfake" video harmful to Trump. Rumors I have seen are that they have Trump on video groping a GOP donor's daughter, or that they got him saying the hard r. I can't imagine either will make a difference, but should be fun to see the first major political video scandal in the post AI Deepfake US election.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 10 points 16 hours ago

It seems like the arrival of deep fakes is going to make photo and video evidence a lot less convincing than it used to be. If there's a video of you doing something bad, you can say "it's a deep fake", whether the video is fake or not, and it will be a plausible claim allowing those who want to believe your innocence to do so.

[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 6 points 15 hours ago

Too late to save Al Franken lol

[-] ziggurter@hexbear.net 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

lathe-of-heaven Turns out they were talking about the McDonald's drive-through video.

[-] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It's going to be about him saying McDonald's is bullshit, and he prefers KFC, imagine the scandal.

KFC is objectively better of course.

[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 13 points 19 hours ago

Trump may lose the Mcdonalds vote, but he may still be able to recover if he can capitalize on the KFC vote. I still think Kamala could record herself working at Burger King to counter Trump. pepe-silvia

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dustbunnies@hexbear.net 15 points 19 hours ago

can't imagine who is genuinely undecided at this point – like, at best, I can see somebody being like, "meh 🤷" but I can't see anyone who actually would be surprised and/or have their opinion swayed by more evidence of Trump being a predator and a crook or, conversely, Kamala being a cop and not giving a single shit

they're both awful, which everyone with a heart can see.

"no fucks to give, who cares? 🤷" makes sense to me, but "not sure which is better 🤷" seems so fucking nonsensical. I don't watch tv or do other social media, though, and I'm autistic, so I'm probably wildly out of touch with the neurotypical mainstream. but wow, the idea that there are actual undecideds out there boggles me, but apparently there are enough for Dem strategists to think that more grope evidence will matter.

clown-to-clown-communication clown-to-clown-conversation

just honking into the void, hoping for an echo

[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 12 points 19 hours ago

If you honk long into the void, the void honks back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 76 points 1 day ago

PSA: All payments formerly arriving in Putin Pennies, XiCoin, or Lulag Gold will now arrive in BRICS Bux.

[-] refolde@hexbear.net 58 points 1 day ago

WHAT DO I DO WITH THE XICOINS I ALREADY HAVE THOUGH

[-] Sleve_McDichael@hexbear.net 53 points 1 day ago

You can use a slurp juice on multiple xicoins

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 34 points 23 hours ago

they'll be revalued by the end of the year, we'll become bricsbux billionaires

[-] BlueMagaChud@hexbear.net 22 points 21 hours ago

if Iraq joins can I finally convert my dinars?

[-] jack@hexbear.net 15 points 20 hours ago

It's going to happen soon!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago

Putin has such a mischievous look on his face here. Like he’s a little raccoon breaking into the pantry and ruining the freshly baked dollar hegemony

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 51 points 1 day ago

China and Russia Have an Unbreakable Friendship: President Xi - Telesur English

Article

The sense of duty of Russia and China as great powers remain unaltered, he pointed out. On Tuesday, President Xi Jinping met with President Vladimir Putin during the BRICS summit in Kazan, where he reaffirmed China’s “unbreakable” friendship with Russia.

“The international situation is undergoing significant changes and turbulence, but this cannot weaken my conviction in the unbreakable strategic choice of both countries,” the Chinese President said, emphasizing that despite unprecedented tectonic shifts in several centuries, the deep friendship between the Chinese and Russians, and their sense of duty as great powers, remain “unaltered.”

Xi thanked Putin for the invitation to visit the Tatar capital and noted that this was the third meeting between the two leaders this year. He also highlighted that Russia and China recently celebrated the 75th anniversary of their diplomatic relations.

“We have taken the right path in building relations between major powers based on the principles of non-alignment, non-confrontation, and not being directed against third countries,” the Chinese leader said, emphasizing that BRICS is one of the most important platforms for promoting a new multipolar world order.

In this regard, he also stressed the great significance of the Kazan summit, as it will be the first BRICS meeting since the inclusion of Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia.

The Russian president emphasized that strategic relations with the Asian giant are an “example” for all countries, as they are mutually beneficial and not based on short-term circumstances.

“Russian-Chinese cooperation in global affairs is one of the stabilizing factors in the international arena. We intend to continue expanding cooperation on all international platforms to ensure global security and a just world order,” he noted.

Putin will host a dinner later today, which will be attended by the leaders of the nine BRICS members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia. Representatives from over 20 countries interested in joining this economic cooperation group will also be present.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ziggurter@hexbear.net 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty good call outs of the Genocide Joe administration from the State Department diplomat who quit (with only a bit of backhanded shit like calling Hamas a "terrorist" organization):

Also, apparently Blinken went straight from Israel to Saudi Arabia. Hmm.

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 25 points 21 hours ago

straight from Israel to Saudi Arabia

US' allies are countries made of failsons

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] companero@hexbear.net 84 points 1 day ago

Mexico announces food and agriculture plan that could take the country back to the 1980s

Sheinbaum appears to have a deep interest in boosting beans.

The government aims to boost bean production by about 30% in six years to replace imports of beans, and will set up research centers to supply higher-yielding bean seeds.

“Self-sufficiency in beans is a goal the president has set for us,” Berdegué said.

Bean Queen bean

López Obrador also appears to have passed on his nostalgia for a 1970s-style Mexico — including passenger rail service, state-owned industries, tight-knit families and small corner stores — to Sheinbaum.

Hell yeah.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 41 points 1 day ago

Putin wants to keep Dilma at the head of the BRICS bank

Russian President Vladimir Putin wants Dilma Rousseff to remain head of the New Development Bank (NDB, the BRICS bank) in the next phase, when Russia would take control of the institution. Sources linked to the Kremlin have confirmed this intention. Rousseff took over the presidency of the BRICS Bank in April.

Russia currently has a vice-presidency at the bank, held by Vladimir Kazbekov, who was previously director of the National Development Bank of Russia for more than 15 years. During the BRICS summit in Kazan, Rousseff had a long conversation with Putin.

Now, the question is whether the members of the bank will reach a consensus for Rousseff to continue as president. The Kremlin, however, has shown support for her staying on.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
129 points (97.1% liked)

news

23494 readers
679 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS