42

This was included in the Star Trek Day content, but released separately a couple of days ago.

It’s nice to see Discovery getting a lot of love in this. It also really shows how great so many of Discovery’s vfx heavy scenes have been.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Supervivens@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I’m not a huge fan of IP milking but I gotta say I like what they’ve done so far with like lower decks and Strange New Worlds

[-] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 30 points 1 year ago

With you on both. Strange New Worlds feels like real Star Trek, and Lower Decks has far more heart to it than I'd have expected.

[-] JackDark@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Of course there is zero mention of Prodigy...

Or Short Treks, which was referred to as a fifth series at one point.

The Prodigy erasure is brutal and unbecoming.

I really feel like I’m back in the late 70s with the TAS erasure.

[-] BadExampleMan@mstdn.social 3 points 1 year ago

@JackDark @StillPaisleyCat Right? I guess Paramount has decided to memory-hole it quick. Shame.

[-] Nmyownworld@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago

It is nice to see Discovery, and my favorites of the recent Star Treks -- PIC and LD, getting some love. Paramount continuing to pretend that there is no such thing as Prodigy is annoying. Prodigy is not my cup of tea, but I support other Star Trek fans who enjoy the show.

[-] gnuplusmatt@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

The video is from Paramount Plus, who don't currently have the rights to Prodigy, even though the parent company does. If they included it in their promotional material it would effect their ability to either sell those rights to someone else or write the show off for tax purposes.

It's convoluted and stupid, but running your streaming service as a separate entity is how all the studios have it rigged up. Accounting ftw

[-] Nmyownworld@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

It’s convoluted and stupid, but running your streaming service as a separate entity is how all the studios have it rigged up. Accounting ftw

Convoluted, indeed. At this point, Paramount+ has zero say in Prodigy. Maybe Paramount+ even mentioning the existence of Prodigy might mess up their write-off (I'm saying this with zero sympathy for the "creative" accounting, just to be clear). I have no idea where Nickelodeon even factors in the Prodigy rights situation. Paramount allowed a sneak peek at Prodigy season 2, episode 1 before, WOW - Prodigy Second Season Sneak Peek!. All in all, a very frustrating situation. It seems the best we can do is keep Prodigy's name alive online and in letters.

[-] ilhamagh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have no idea how accounting works.

Can you enlighten me why they did that? What's this "creative" accounting?

[-] Nmyownworld@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not an accountant. My understanding is that streaming companies are using accounting alchemy with write-downs to bump up what's in the profit category for a quarter. A streaming program getting this treatment disappears from the streaming platform. The studio chooses to take a quick on paper profit now, rather than continue to carry a show for a possible profit later. Viewers are left in the lurch -- the show(s) they enjoyed or intended to watch are gone. And creators are hung out to dry, as the programs they created and worked on are not only gone from the streaming service, but may never be seen again. Prodigy has the advantage of a vocal fan base. Many shows might never gain an audience because there is no longer any way to see them.

Prodigy isn't the only program Paramount+ disappeared. Paramount+ isn't the only company doing this. Disney Plus removed a lot content earlier this year.

[-] doublenut@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Bit backwards. They're making it look like they're taking a loss on paper in order to avoid "actual losses" which include paying their fair share of taxes as well as the creatives, actors and production folk that would otherwise receive residuals on the now extinct future profits. This tactic is a major driver in the current strikes.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I liked 99.9% of SNW, and look forward to more seasons of it, everything else, in humble opinion is unwatchable trash

[-] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

Have you tried Lower Decks? It's brilliant.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I found it shrill and unentertaining

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

The first three episodes or so do give off poor first impressions, but once Lower Decks finds its tempo, it keeps it, and absolutely flies with it.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's particularly good. It's not bad, there is some good acting, the aesthetics are nice. I'm not a fan of the writing. The character arcs are good, but the episode plots themselves are quite predictable.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

As opposed to every other Trek series, which are full of plot twists and unexpected endings?

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago
[-] ieightpi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If there was any doubt that Paramount was planning to put the IP back in hibernation with all of the cuts in the streaming industry, this promotion clip should ease those doubts.

But i know people will still come back with doom and gloom. Im just trying to help you feel better.

Stay positive Trekkies 🖖

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

I just dread whatever they try to replace Discovery with. As good as SNW turned out to be, it's an aberration, and most Trek shows tend to get off to a pretty rocky start.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
42 points (85.0% liked)

Star Trek

10571 readers
97 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-07 LD 5x04 "A Farewell to Farms"
11-14 LD 5x05 "Star Base 80?"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angels"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS