356
submitted 20 hours ago by kixik@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 hours ago

We're gonna start seeing large open source communities start to break into smaller ones because of sanctions from now aren't we?

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago

You don't need sanctions. I've seen you petty fucks fork projects over a font.

[-] banana@communick.news 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This article gives a good discussion about a potential coming East/West political split in the world of FOSS.

https://thenewstack.io/avoiding-a-geopolitical-open-source-apocalypse/

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 hours ago

This sets such a bad precedent...

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 2 minutes ago

Arguably, ITAR set the precedent in the 1990's during the crypto wars. USians used to have to travel to Canada to work on cryptographic code in OpenBSD because their commits couldn't legally be exported.

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 hours ago

The bad precedent was starting a war

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 hours ago

Yeah I'm sure the maintainers are in talks with Putin directly

[-] ouch@lemmy.world 36 points 7 hours ago

As a finn, I understand that there are probably legal reasons for doing this.

I just wish they would be transparent and share those reasons with us. The Linux kernel is certainly not the only free software project that is impacted, if this comes straight from EU/US sanctions. Maintainers of other projects have a lot of interest in what is happening.

Transparency is also important because if EU/US policy/sanctions are causing issues for free software projects, then that discussion needs to be public, so that there is a chance to amend the policies if necessary.

[-] ahriboy@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 7 hours ago

Politics should not be on FOSS development.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 3 hours ago

FOSS is inherently political though, but I guess you mean country vs country politics moreso than ideological politics.

[-] kmaismith@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

That is hardcore wishful thinking, the nature by which critical digital infrastructure is developed and maintained is of keen importance to political systems everywhere. This situation was inevitable with the ongoing escalation of war

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That's why the "should be" I guess, though that's not to say there aren't idiots (right in this thread too) actually shilling for this.

If current open source licenses still have flaws like this, we're gonna need new ones.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago

He alludes to sanctions being a factor but never clarifies on advice from his lawyers. ngl I don't like the look of it just from a transparency perspective.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
356 points (97.8% liked)

Linux

47839 readers
1602 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS