349
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"I'm concerned but voting for him anyway, because I'm an absolute fucking tool."

-MAGgots I guess.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Undecideds:

On the one hand, I am concerned about his basic fitness for office. But on the other hand, I am also concerned that the competent lady who has been in office for the past four years may not totally agree with me on everything. How can I possibly choose between them?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago
[-] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not saying I condone political violence, but the Democratic Party has absolutely not been willing to stop Republicans "by any means necessary, even violence".

Large parts of "the Left", maybe; but certainly not the actual party politicians.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Not sure how you confused an ANTIFA flag with “the dems” unless it was intentional.

[-] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

....ashamed to admit I didn't recognize the flag, and was thinking of people saying that the two political parties are indistinguishable. That does make more sense.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Fair enough.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Political violence is an inevitability. It's up to us to ensure we get the best possible type of violence.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

For a lot of them, I don't think it goes any farther than: "Yeah he says things I don't necessarily agree with, but groceries are more expensive than ever and I just want things to be different."

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I saw something a few weeks ago that went something like "People really about to elect a fascist who wants to terminate the constitution just to shave $0.50 off the price of eggs."

Really, it should have been "because they think he'll shave $0.50 off the price of eggs.", because he doesn't have a policy plan to tackle inflation. He doesn't have a plan at all aside from staying out of prison.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago

The media isn't pounding Trump about his age like they did Biden every single day for weeks.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Billionaire owners want Trump so they have put their weight on the scale months ago.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 45 points 5 days ago

I am more concerned about him wanting to be a dictator on day one and him being a Nazi

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Americans are increasingly concerned about Donald Trump’s age and fitness as dictator

[-] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Kinda makes sense? If you're monarchist, king's mental state should be your top concern.

If you're a fascist though you operate on vibes and therefore do not care.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Kinda, but the lines between monarchy and fascism are far thinner - and blurrier - than you might be willing to see.

There are sacrosanct barriers against what our founding fathers fought for freedom against, even a litany of monographs and treatises, that directly and loudly proclaim that what Trump is doing is in direct opposition to it.

But, sadly, the dumbest and most hateful among us will exercise their voice in unison— but there are more of us than them. The problem is getting everyone to vote. So do what you can to convince people to vote. And make sure that you vote too!

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

And how is it that you don’t see that they’re the same thing?

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

Oh, just now? Christ almighty were fucking stupid

[-] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago
[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

Little fucking late now isn't it?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago
[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Actually no. The article is a “water is wet” piece. Nobody has changed their opinion since yesterday.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 days ago

I have been concerned about his fitness for office since always.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

This is one of those times where it doesn't matter. At this stage, they're gonna vote for him anyway.

[-] awkwardly_personal@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In Texas this election cycle terrified me, it is far different than any previous cycle I've voted in here, even when required to vote in person during COVID. Some of the measures implemented at state level really change the experience of voting. The candidate order is simply based on the governor's party, so always Republican first. And while standing in line the Dallas Morning News was handing out their recommendations for how to vote on the propositions. By only handing out their proposition recommendations and not endorsing a presidential candidate this cycle it hid the fact that they're a conservative publication, and likely fooled a number of left leaning folks to vote against their own interest on the already poorly summarized propositions.

Trump is certainly a part of this problem but it's much, much, deeper than that.

[-] manucode@infosec.pub 14 points 5 days ago

The question is which Americans are increasingly concerned about his age and fitness. Only those who already think he's politically unfit for office, or a significant number of his supporters and those sitting on the fence as well?

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oh, it is already that time of the week where the media pushes this as new information?

Wake me up when his drafty attic actually results in removal from the Republican ticket or breaks through the Republican voter information blockade.

[-] themachine@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

This headline and article is bullshit. Yeah being that old is a negative. But look at Bernie, he would have been just fine when he ran.

The real and glaring issue is Trump himself. Full stop.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Took them long enough to notice.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
349 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19136 readers
5084 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS