164
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] halfpipe@hexbear.net 87 points 4 weeks ago

This feels like a serious fuck up for the western media. They handwave the existence of their billionaire owners by saying that they don't determine what gets printed , even though that's an obvious lie , but now they're on record with the billionaire owner putting his foot down for Trump.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 58 points 4 weeks ago

Liberals will say it's no biggie. Their nonsense argument will be that liberal billionaires should start buying newspapers.

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 28 points 4 weeks ago
[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 16 points 4 weeks ago

To push off the glass cliff.

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Lol Bezos was supposed to be that liberal billionaire.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 28 points 4 weeks ago

With libs feeling betrayed, I hope I can set some of them on the leftist pipeline by offering them the writings of Thomas Frank.

The whole “good rich” that liberals cozied up to was never meant to last.

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 78 points 4 weeks ago

I actually support the libs that unsub from wapo, not because i care about them not endorsing kamala but because this will hurt the journalists in wapo that have been posting genocide denial stories in the paper for months

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 41 points 4 weeks ago

this will hurt the journalists in wapo that have been posting genocide denial stories in the paper for months

I think their jobs are secure. If cutbacks are needed - the paper will fire the people least important and/or who make the least amount of money.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 32 points 4 weeks ago

They're just going to move on to another paper that does genocide denial on the same level

[-] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 77 points 4 weeks ago

imagine paying for news.

next imagine paying for news baked with pro-capitalist propaganda.

now imagine cancelling that subscription because the capitalist propaganda wouldn't praise the blue capitalist.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 47 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Liberals: Love getting all my objectively correct information from unbiased news sources, I sure do hate propaganda!

Also liberals: I hereby condemn this "news" source for not explicitly endorsing my preferred candidate! I WILL DRAG THEM TO HELL!!!

yea

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 45 points 4 weeks ago

so they're ok with genocide denial and getting all their info straight from the CIA but not ok with them not endorsing Harris?

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 40 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I didn't put this in the dunk tank because I assume Bezos doesn't care at all. He uses the paper to advertise Prime etc. His bigger toy cost him twice as much - his $500m yacht. Also - he's clearly betting on a Trump win and he'll recoup any tiny WaPo losses via juicy federal contracts that come his way.

[-] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 35 points 4 weeks ago

Trump calling stuff fake news and saying journalists are the enemy (heartbreaking) caused liberal trust of the media to skyrocket. They had more skepticism though not enough before that. Compared with conservatives, liberals claimed higher levels of trust of everything including literal right wing propaganda outlets since Trump. Conservatives basically only trust Fox News which is just about the only right wing propaganda that liberals didn't trust. So I hope they wake up to the fact that all media is owned by capitalists and there's apparently a lot of value they see in being able to influence public opinion.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago

Conservatives have even started turning against Fox because "It's not conservative enough." They were pissing and shitting all over themselves when Fox announced Biden won in 2020.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 4 weeks ago

No, they won't, they treat this strictly personally.

[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 31 points 4 weeks ago

Smd democracy dies in dwindling subscription revenue

[-] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 31 points 4 weeks ago

Seriously, what kind of thoughtless husk subscribes to a newspaper? What kind of void entity cancels their subscription to said newspaper because of electoralism?

I feel like I already consume too much news through internet exposure alone.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

My lib friends: “Glad I canceled that earlier this year already, hahah” libbing-out

[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 27 points 4 weeks ago

Say what you want about propaganda under socialism, but westoids are so cucked they actually pay for the privilege of being brainwashed

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 24 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I’m lazy and don’t care all that much about Beezer facts but how much of his money is derived from the newspaper, versus everything ele? Because realistically unless that is a major source of it, I can’t see this doing much of anything. There’s A, plus AWS, which make him bank. Those two things need to be what people call up and cancel if they’re gonna call up and cancel anything.

What do you call this, just token liberalism or something?

Only people this is going to effect is the staffers at the ~~magazine~~ newspaper

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago

I think Bezos believes, with some reason, that it would hurt his name among some ghoul circles to be associated with an endorsement of Kamala over Trump (and the reverse is also true). It has basically nothing to do with the amount of money the paper makes (as OP demonstrates, this was actually bad for WP making money) and everything to do with Bezos's reputation.

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 12 points 4 weeks ago

It's better than nothing. For the wrong reasons, but...meh

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

He actually runs WaPo at a loss. He subsidizes the newspaper to print propaganda. Libs are just mad that it is not the propaganda they want.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 20 points 4 weeks ago

https://subium.com/profile/joshuajfriedman.com/post/3l7o5ckrjya2y

Mr. Bezos sir - you are canceled.

Yesterday @apocalypticanow.bsky.social used the word "decimate" to describe what Bezos had done to his newspaper and that prediction is now made real and literal.

[-] Goblinmancer@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago

Wait newspapers are supposed to endorse presidential candidates? i thought they pride themselves to be "politically neutral" or some stupid liberal concept.

[-] dynasty@hexbear.net 12 points 4 weeks ago

Every Canadian local newspaper will endorse the conservative candidate without fail

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 weeks ago

Because every Canadian newspaper is owned by PostMedia. Our media landscape is bleak.

[-] Femcowboy@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

So the reason this is controversial is that the Washington post almost always does and when the editors room said, "we want to endorse Harris," Jeff Bezos went, "we don't endorse candidates starting now."

[-] Tychoxii@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago

Wapo completes transition to astroturf legacy media

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago

I honestly cannot imagine canceling a subscription to a newspaper because it didn't endorse the candidate you want. Or any candidate at all. Bizarre echo chamber behavior. I'm sure The Economist will endorse Harris like it endorsed Biden. Won't stop me from reading that garbage because it's the news.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago
[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 4 weeks ago

What did WatPo do? Admit that Ukraine is unwinnable?

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 34 points 4 weeks ago

refuse to endorse kopmala i think

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago

Would the endorsement have been effectual at all?

Are there undecided voters paying for fucking WaPo? Americans can't even read

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 11 points 4 weeks ago
[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

i put this thread into notebooklm and listened to the podcast it generated and I think this stuff would be good to unbrainwash liberals because it presents it in a format they are familiar with -- npr-style podcasts. I think it's only a matter of time until notebooklm becomes censored though.

the podcast:

  • recommended people to think critically
  • read media from diverse sources, including from other countries.
  • discussed the westoids and imagine paying for news comments
[-] real@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Stupid ass treat printer go brrrr

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
164 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
727 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS