259
submitted 14 hours ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 hours ago

Remember when Microsoft said Windows 10 would be the last version of Windows?

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I 'member.

Twas Dickity 14 or so, and I plan to make good on Microsofts words.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 5 hours ago

The herd keeps me secure

[-] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 5 hours ago

Still cheaper than my Arch Premium membership

[-] distortwave@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 hours ago

Thank you for your service to Linux adoption o7

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago

Wait. They want me to pay for something I already paid for?

Well guess my $2.5k new windowless machine is looking better everyday.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

You actually paid for Windows?

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Oh yeah. Windows XP Professional 64 bit. Each "upgrade" used the same license and never really got screwy until 10. Won't go to 11.

Edit: Actually I don't think I even paid for that, I think it was an OEM license my dad got from his work.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 61 points 11 hours ago

Considering that when people paid $100 for that OS they were told that it would be the "last Windows to be released", shouldn't there be a class action lawsuit?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 29 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They weren't told that, that was an off-hand comment by an employee (not even a spokesperson) that the media took and ran with. Source:

Right now we're releasing Windows 10, and because Windows 10 is the last version of Windows, we're all still working on Windows 10.

I think they meant "latest" not "last."

[-] Bongles@lemm.ee 14 points 10 hours ago

For what it's worth

"Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers," says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement to The Verge. "We aren’t speaking to future branding at this time, but customers can be confident Windows 10 will remain up-to-date and power a variety of devices from PCs to phones to Surface Hub to HoloLens and Xbox. We look forward to a long future of Windows innovations."

https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-version-of-windows

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 hours ago

Windows will be delivered as a service

Which is largely true, there have been a number of "service packs" that were released as regular updates throughout the Windows 10 lifespan. So it definitely seems they want people to not think about the specific Windows version they're on. From that article:

Microsoft could opt for Windows 11 or Windows 12 in future, but if people upgrade to Windows 10 and the regular updates do the trick then everyone will just settle for just "Windows" without even worrying about the version number.

Windows 7, for example, had one major service pack, with a few isolated updates, whereas Windows 10 had a major update about every 6 months, and each one of those checkpoints was supported for about a year and a half. The final update was at the end of 2022, and it's support runs 3 years.

So yeah, I think they met what they said, but the messaging wasn't particularly clear how long that support would be provided for.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

This is like people complaining about how Ubuntu 16.04 LTS support ended not long ago (2021-04-29)

Or macOS 10.9 Mavericks (2016-12-01)

Or Android 6.0 (2018-08-01)

Or Debian 8 "Jessie" (2018-06-17)

Or Linux Mint 17 (2019-07-01)

Or Fedora 23 (2016-12-20)

Or Slackware 14.1 (2024-01-01)

Of all of these, not even Slackware comes close to how long Microsoft has supported Windows 10 post release (2015)

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

To my knowledge upgrading to the newer release of any of those linux distros was not blocked by having only slightly old and perfectly serviceable hardware.

[-] M600@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Apple hardware would like to have a word with you.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

To my knowledge upgrading to the newer release of any of those linux distros did not cost any money to the users, either.

[-] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 hours ago

Windows XP. 2001–2019. If 10 beats that I'll be impressed

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

2014.... the POS edition (basically LTSC) was 2019

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 8 hours ago

Yes, but you don't migrate to Windows 11 from those.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I migrated someone running mission critical software off of CentOS 6 this year.

People hate upgrades.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 96 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I like all the comments ready to take a fisting in the ass from Microsoft just to keep Windows 10.

If you raised a fucking stink instead of taking this shitty deal, they may be forced to keep supporting it for free anyway like they did with Windows 7.

They've really got you guys cowed into paying for the convenience of getting fucked, don't they?

This is a company with a market cap of $3.04 trillion and you guys are just gonna bend over and take it for $30 bucks? Wew lad. They don't need your fucking thirty dollars, and you fucking know it. It's a god damned shakedown.

Microsoft: Wouldn't it be a shame if your computer was somehow insecure and got hacked?

Sounds like a Mafioso showing up for protection money to me.

EDIT: There's still about 700 million Windows 10 PC's still on the market. If every single existing Windows 10 machine paid for this service, Microsoft would make $21 billion dollars next year off this alone. It's a shakedown, do the fucking math. (700,000,000 x $30 = $21,000,000,000) Even if only half do it, it's still a cool $10.5 billion.

EDIT II: This also normalizes the practice of paying for security updates for consumers. You really want to take us down that path where every security update is paid?

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 hours ago

It would make sense if Microsoft was liable for any security faults. I’d actually pay for something like that but of course you’re probably paying for some nebulous promise of something between security at best effort basis and whatever they feel like.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] trespasser69@lemmy.world 24 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Why l would pay 30$ to dumpester fire OS to use it securely for another year when l could install Linux for free with more than 7 year security?

And consumers can only pay for single year.

It just shows how M$ doesn't care about their costumers treating them like lab rats.

[-] HC4L@lemmy.world 43 points 12 hours ago

I switched to Linux myself but can we please stop lying about Linux being a drop-in replacement? There is enough sofware that does not work.

[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 31 points 11 hours ago

A lot of Linux users here think the conversation begins and ends with game support. A lot of us use our computers for work and there is a lot of productivity and creative software that does not play nice with Linux. I've probably said this a dozen times here before but I'll say it again: Not all of us use our computers solely for gaming.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Honestly I figure "work computers" are often overlooked because many companies force windows for their ~~spying~~ "productivity monitoring" apps.

That said, there's always "having a work computer and a separate secure personal computer." The linux machine doesn't even have to be particularly powerful, it could be whatever old used machine (w/o nvidia) you can get your hands on.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 30 points 13 hours ago

“Enrolled PCs will continue to receive Critical and Important security updates for Windows 10; however, new features, bug fixes, and technical support will no longer be available from Microsoft,” explains Yusuf Mehdi, executive vice president and consumer chief marketing officer at Microsoft.

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 26 points 13 hours ago

Anyone who's had to open a Microsoft support ticket can assure you technical support is already not available from Microsoft.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 34 points 14 hours ago

$30 to not have to deal with Windows 11 for another year feels like the deal of the century.

I love how they're like 'but you won't get new features!'. They may have still not figured out that nobody cares about 'new features' being stuffed into the OS, but I guess you can't have everything.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Fuck me harder, Daddy Microsoft.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
259 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

58999 readers
4301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS