333

Springfield Ohio Sheriff’s Lieutenant Says He Won’t Protect Dems (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 1 week ago by VantaBrandon@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 137 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

According to WHIO, who obtained an “investigative file” and communications within the office, Rodgers said he was prescribed sleep aids and that his ‘out of character’ actions were a “documented side effect.”

Ah, the classic Roseanne defense. Most people don't start spewing hate under the influence of medication if they don't normally use that kind of language when they're sober.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 week ago

Alcohol doesn't change people, it just makes it easier to bring their true selves to the front.

[+] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People that say this either don’t understand alcohol or haven’t been around it much.

Edit: I cannot believe that people need clarification of this is 2024. Alcohol modifies someone’s personality through its effects. If you’ve ever heard of a happy or angry drunk, that’s why. It can cause mood swings in people, increased aggression, and at the same time makes them act irrationally. That isn’t the “real person” underneath. The part of you that alcohol takes away is part of you.

And when you take away the ability to reason and make good decisions, you say all sorts of stupid things you don’t mean. That isn’t the real you. A drunk person will mostly just be telling you their impulsive subconscious thoughts that they aren’t in control of at all. That’s not a real person at that point.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

People who say this obviously don't drink. The drunker I get the more friendly I get and to be honest annoyingly chatty. My friends who get angry were just better at hiding it when sober.

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Yeah I was going to say the same thing, I used to drink a lot and I never did anything drunk that I didn't want to do sober. The drinking just impairs judgement and how much you care about consequences in the moment.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What are you talking about? Alcohols ability to lower inhibitions is well known and studied.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

Yea... Studying, that's what I was doing on Friday night

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

And that’s exactly what makes it not the “real you”. Read my edit but someone without inhibitions isn’t telling you who they are, they’re telling you who they choose not to be using inhibitions.

[-] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

You're not accounting for people who are restrained from being who they truly are or who they want to be by the perceived consequences until they're intoxicated and don't care about the consequences anymore. Bigots who might only say bigoted things in "safe" company unless they drink too much aren't virtuous people holding back intrusive thoughts. They are bigots who finally feel free to do so.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago

I'm only a racist when I'm sleepy.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

It's a case of Medicated Angry Geriatric Asshole.

[-] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago

This dude thinks EVERYONE is thinking what he’s thinking and we just don’t say it out loud. He thinks ANY of us are one drunk post away from spewing the same garbage. In his mind he’s just guilty of posting under the influence because of that.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 91 points 1 week ago

Fire this fool and make an example of him. Dude is the reason we don't trust the police.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

He should at the bottom of the ladder acting like this.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago

The department told the outlet that they apologize for his behavior and that Rodgers has received “received a written reprimand for a violation of the department’s social media policy and will remain on duty.”

Oh, he got a reprimand. Well that should take care of everything. I'm sure he's learned a valuable lesson. Public trust restored.

[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago

I won’t be satisfied with anything less than a full disadulation

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He hasn’t even done a “This isn’t who I am” yet!

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Oh but he has!

According to WHIO, who obtained an “investigative file” and communications within the office, Rodgers said he was prescribed sleep aids and that his ‘out of character’ actions were a “documented side effect.”

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but at leat he doesn't get a vacation for being a Bad Boy ^TM^

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sure he'll regret it for as long as he's collecting his 150k a year pension.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 1 week ago

Joke's on him, I don't ever expect cops to protect anyone. Just property.

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 51 points 1 week ago

God damn, I feel so much shame for the way the Haitians there are treated. They first had to deal with a former president turning them into dog eaters and now have a police department that seems ready to watch them die. The only union that needs busting in this country is the police one.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago

Wow, he is basically dog whistling that it’s okay to attack dems. I’m tired of all this stochastic terrorism.

[-] krippix@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

seems like a regular whistle to me

[-] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Police don’t have to protect anyone. They are just a bunch of pigs on power trips.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Give up being a sheriff then.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"the end of days" part of his quote tells you everything you need to know about this bastard. He thinks he's going to heaven soon, and if you disagree with him, you're not. If course even if there was a heaven, which there's no evidence for and I didn't believe in, he's sure as fuck not going there with his attitude. These idiot "Christians" have never even read their own handbook.

This guy should be stripped of his rank and position and investigated for criminal malfeasance, dereliction of duty, and threatening the public. On top of the lawsuits that should be piling on top of him if he follows through on this threat.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

From what I’ve seen over the years and in the lead-up to the election - and frankly, what specifically concerns me about this election - is that there are going to be a LOT of trumpians in a LOT of local and state law enforcement and electoral positions who knowingly and willingly violate all sorts of laws with the interest of interfering in the electoral process at any and all levels to push things towards Trump.

He’s more or less promised to pardon the lot of them. Which, technically, would be within his power if he weasels into office. They’re they’re not only cognizant of their own guilt, but also motivated to follow through on whatever they’re planning, because they know they’re probably already in some very murky legal waters, and for them, the only way “out” is through a Trump win and a (hypothetical, though I expect ultimately vaporware) blanket pardon because they “helped Trump win”.

This is why Trump “loves the uneducated”: they’re statistically easier to scam.

[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Would it be appropriate to send in the national guard, or perhaps federal agents temporarily? This would be terrifying to an average citizen I'd imagine.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Would it be appropriate to send in the national guard

Sending in the National Guard in Ohio always works out well!

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So well in fact, someone should write a song about it!!

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At this point, restarting the Manhattan project in Springfield Ohio probably wouldn't be enough.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ohio was the inspiration for the Ohio-class submarine, which has the terrifying ability to turn any location on the planet into Ohio in less than 30 minutes

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It reads like an Onion article. Bravo!

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Well then, I guess the Dems won't pay your salary, fuckface.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ok, so make sure to send all their addresses to knows criminals and gang members...only fair since they're perfectly fine voting for a convicted felon

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What a total asshole, but it's not as if his kind of thinking is unique among the radical extremists that call themselves Republicans.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024

333 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers

2065 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News