190

funny skull man makes a good point (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 hours ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 24 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

they would run the same campaign

I'm waging they would have simply not pulled Biden off the front of the ticket and let him take the L, so Kamala could run in 2028.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 18 points 3 hours ago

I doubt most of the party wanted to ever run Kamala

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 31 points 3 hours ago

So like, if the US election was between a prosecutor/former attorney general and a convicted felon, and the felon won... Does that mean the US electorate just officially said ACAB?

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 27 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, because the prosecutor was running under the 'ACAB party' and the felon was running under the 'Law and Order party' according to a not insignificant part of this country

[-] viva_la_juche@hexbear.net 14 points 3 hours ago

He don’t miss folks

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Winning for establishment Dems means keeping the big dollar donations flowing in. Which is the fundamental reason they suppress the left and progressive candidates, them winning causes the Mark Cubans to hold back on the big checks.