169
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago

This guy really thinks he's never gonna die. I'll be surprised if he survives this upcoming term, and not even from a Minecraft related cause, just poor health.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

What is a "Minecraft related cause?"

[-] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

When you're talking about actionable threats, I.E. real world violence, but want to appear only hypothetical, the meme is, "I'd kill X in Minecraft.".

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Creepers in the White House, it's a known problem in the dark corners of the building. Half of what the secret service does in the morning is clear the building of creepers that spawned over night when no one was around to block hostile mob spawns.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Death by Ender Dragon.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

A lot of dumb people thought they could talk about killing politicians on the Internet if they ended their message with "in Minecraft" so they could claim they were just taking about a game. At least one of them has already been arrested proving their plan doesn't actually provide any defense.

So a Minecraft cause would be someone plotting (and then presumably actually) killing them.

[-] anguo@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I'm sorry, a 'Minecraft related cause'?

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

He got the wrong ideas from all these god emporer memes back in the day.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Moneo! Bring another attorney general!

[-] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago

“He jokes all the time,” said Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., who was in the room at the time. “I think it's one of the problems with politics is you can't even tell a joke without being excoriated.”

Definitely, that's the problem in politics. Ffs.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

"excoriated"

That's certainly a $10 word for a Republican.

[-] astanix@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

He won't need to run. He already said he will be a dictator. Dictators don't need elections.

This is what we get.

Revolution is the answer. Killing the rich.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago
[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

We are in the bad timeline friend.

[-] valaramech@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago

The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there's no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

The only potential loophole that I can discern is that there's no clear consensus on if Trump would be allowed to run as Vice-President on someone else's ticket. If he can, then, theoretically, he could run for VP and then have the elected President immediately resign, making him the President again.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

So right at the end of the 12th amendment there's this line.

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

So as of his presidential win this election he's ineligible to be vice president.

The Supreme Court will just "interpret" that away.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

With as much as this Supreme Court is riding Trump's dick I wouldn't put it past them to rule in his favor if this made it to them.

[-] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

The 22a says he can't be elected. But that doesn't make him ineligible to serve. The wording presents a loophole that our highly partisan Supreme Court could drive a truck through.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Could he then be nominated Speaker of the House, and then have the President and Vice-President resign?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure no.

There's a whole bunch of stuff in different parts of the constitution and us code that mention intelligibility in the line of succession. There might be a loop hole around this though I am no constitutional law expert

[-] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 months ago

...there's no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

We've had an extraordinary number of "there's no way that..." moments in the past decade most of which have been connected to Trump, why tempt fate like that? The 2024 election map has more than the 38 red states needed to ratify a constitutional amendment.

[-] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Where are you getting your numbers from lol

[-] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

A stretched the real numbers (33 states for Trump) for the sake of my joke.

Realistically, Maga passing a constitutional amendment repealing the 22nd (I think) that limits terms for Presidents is possible, but incredibly unlikely. It's a lengthy process on purpose full of all sorts of ways to slow it down even further or derail it entirely. He has the political will and the power right now and for the next 2 years, but I'd bet if he's able to pull off even some of his more spectacular plans, enough people would finally get it and he'd lose at least part of Congress, if not all of it.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Or he's gonna wipe his ass with the Constitution in an X live stream and declare Jan 6 "National Patriots Day" while Fox commentators claim he's joking.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

If they do it, it will be by suspending the constitution entirely. Don't need any states for that.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The Putin Ploy

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there’s no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

I no longer believe the process and laws of our government will apply to this administration. We'll see.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Would Trump even hold a candle to motherfucking Obama? 3rd candancy isn't just for Trump...

[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

I mean, we might as well just go all in. It seems like most everyone is running headlong into apocalypse anyway.

I just don't have the capacity for this. Ugh.

[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago

Let's hope the next 4 years are tough on the felon, he may not even make it to 2028 🤞🏼

[-] Poach@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I'm not convinced Vance or Johnson is any better than the orange baffoon .

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 7 points 2 months ago

Will the MAGAs back Vance without Trump?

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

He doesn't have "D" next to his name and has shown no indication of rationality, so yes.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Well, with having control of literally every aspect of the government they actually could change this country for the worse. However, it's theoretically possible that some of them grow a spine.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

More likely is they tie themselves into a giant king rat of greed.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I’m hoping trumps ego foils a lot of the project 2025 bs

[-] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's going to be hard to campaign from a New York state jail cell for the next 4 years. The DOJ may have rules about a sitting president but he was neither when he committed the crimes he has already been convicted of in NY state court.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
169 points (97.2% liked)

News

23807 readers
1062 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS