11
submitted 1 month ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Please don't nominate him for anything else. He resigned from Congress. This could be incredibly hilarious.

Edit: and if any Democrat on the ethics committee doesn't leak the report they should all be primaried and removed from their posts.

[-] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Note that while he resigned from this current Congress, he did get reelected to the next Congress, so he'll still be a US rep in Florida once the session starts in late January. Just kind of an extended two month vacation really.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe not, according to https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/11/21/us/trump-gaetz-news/5e296b83-bf2f-50cc-96b8-5049b764b8a9?smid=url-share:

Absent extraordinary events, we do not expect to see Gaetz back in the House next Congress. When he submitted his resignation to the House last week after being tapped for attorney general, he wrote: “I do not intend to take the oath of office for the same office in the 119th Congress.”

It is always possible that Gaetz can invoke the ancient privilege of "SIKE!!!!" And take it all back. But then the ethics report will get released....

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately for him I mumbled "no takesies backsies" when he resigned so that's off the table

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How many Scaramuccis was that?

[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Scaramucci actually got the job, so it's probably negative Scaramucci's

He held the nomination for .8 Scaramuccis, and was fired 6.2 Scaramuccis before his earliest possible hire date.

Edit: Did Scaramucci math

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He REALLY does not want that ethics probe released. Which means we absolutely should.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I mean okay, I mean Trump will just pick something worse. I'm more disappointed that Democrats didn't grow a spine and just release the house report on Gatez.

[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm more disappointed that Democrats didn't grow a spine

So you are perpetually disappointed, got it.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, pretty much.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I forget who on the NPR politics podcast said that he would get pushed out in backroom conversations, and not on the floor of the house, she nailed it.

They don't want the public drama and infighting, because it makes them look even more incompetent. If they're going to push you out, they're going to do it behind closed doors.

So, which clown is next? RFK, the WWE lady, Doctor Oz?

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Resigning from the 119th congress is essentially an admission of guilt at this point. Whatever is in that report will most likely remain sealed as long as he has the cover of being a private citizen once again, which is why he turned these two opportunities down - to keep the evidence of his wrongdoing under wraps so he can't be held accountable by either the public or the justice department.

So, Matt Gaetz is a pedophile and a child molester. And knowing the state of our shitty fucking country he's probably going to get away with it.

[-] HorreC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

not so quick, maybe you are running from something, we should look into that. We wouldnt wanna spend all that tax payer money on nothing.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Whack the mole now so it doesn't show up somewhere else.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gotta be something big to quit congress after being reelected and then decline the cabinet nomination used to justify pulling out.

This sounds like something serious. Someone should search his couches!

[-] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Aww this clickbait headline got me, I thought he was withdrawing from life :(

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It’s gonna be my pillow guy, hulk hogan, or kid rock.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Gaetz? Pull out? First time for everything I guess...

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Cool, hope he dies.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Excited to see who the next nominee will be. My money is either Don Jr. or PDiddy.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

huurrr hurr hurr

And just when I thought we wouldn't be getting any positive news for 4 years.

Wait until Trump announces his replacement before labeling this as good news

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

He can pull out now. But he may have already come a little

too close to getting the job. Might have blown it.

The house could birth an investigation that spawns many problems.

Shouldn't have been so childish.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I appreciate the effort.

[-] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Alright Marjorie Trailer-Queen, time to nut up (🤮 sorry) and leak (it keeps getting worse) that incriminating info about your fellow GOPedo colleagues that you were so brazen about earlier

[-] pelican7663@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

She never had any intention of releasing anything. She was trying to keep the Gaetz report from coming out.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Weird. Either there's a 4D chess move here, or Trump doesn't have full control of the GOP like he wants.

That's going to cause problems.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Or Gaetz is hoping that no further details from the ethics report leak, and he can salvage his career after this blows over. If it ever does that is.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Or Trump just named somebody he knew would have no chance and make the Left waste energy opposing him, so that they're more accepting of whomever he names for real.

[-] phar@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Makes everyone takes their eyes off Tulsi, the Russian shill that is nominated for Director of fusking national intelligence

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19315 readers
1341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS