76
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 11 points 3 hours ago

So, how are those things street-legal again?

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 8 points 2 hours ago

Easy. Waymo specifically, because over 22 million miles, they have demonstrated that they have about 7 times fewer crashes with injuries than human drivers. (0.4 collisions with injuries per million miles, compared to 2.78 for human drivers).

I don't work for Waymo and I have no particular interest in them "succeeding" but I don't have reason to believe this data is fabricated - NHTSA has tight grips on reporting of every single incident and even disengagements of the autonomous system.

These things are not a Tesla with an inexpensive sensor suite and a deceitfully marketed advanced cruise control.

[-] Bloobish@hexbear.net 7 points 2 hours ago

I love that I clicked on the link and was instantly hit with a paywall

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 4 points 1 hour ago

Oh weird, I don't get a paywall at all. Maybe because I'm in Europe?

[-] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 hours ago

Really good to know. Thanks for the info. doggirl-thumbsup

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 21 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

I don't have a horse in this race but isn't freshly poured concrete without enclosure an equal risk to self-driving and user-driven cars?

[-] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 5 points 2 hours ago

Agreed, it happens to human drivers too. It's on whoever carried out the roadwork to follow the regulations, although if a self-driving car was somewhat smarter it could avoid poured concrete.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13599 readers
956 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS