222
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

I'm all for corporations souring their dopamine pipes. Perhaps it may encourage the users to do something useful with their free time, maybe even pick up a book or two (said he, while scrolling Lemmy in bed).

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Discworld isn't gonna read itself.

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Listening to the Hogfather while doing chores rn 😀

[-] Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

I suspect they anticipate exponential increases in ML generated content creation quality and/or they expect that users will gobble up AI slop and it won't effect medium/long term engagement growth.

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess so, but engagement does not equal revenue, and the models are black boxes that are already falling apart. I have no idea where exponential improvement should come from - throwing more and more computational power into the maw can only get you so far.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Their logo is literally a camera so what’s the point of the app then? Though I’ve heard it’s absolutely overrun with AI slob anyway just like Facebook itself. ‘Social’ networks just can’t help themselves becoming the dead internet theory, can they?

[-] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago

Sharing photos was the point of the app 6 years ago. Now the point is to either meticulously modify yout online image to look like the coolest person on the world - or just spampost memes/porn/disinformation to get followers and brand deals

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Tim Berners-Lee, lying on floor, groans

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The point is to return vale to the shareholders

[-] Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

In case of Meta, this not actually true.

They have a dual layer share structure where Zuck holds special class share that provide him full control even if he doesn't have a majority of "ownership class" shares.

I mean, I am sure Zuck wants "line go up", but we are at point where it's more like his personal fiefdom and he can tell shareholders to bugger off and let him burn $46 Billion on his weird metaverse fetish.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The ungodly rich batards have created another reason the French were so on point

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Instagram was such a great platform in the early days when it was for the most part used by photographers. I lost my interest in it when they started forcing videos instead. Even photographers needed to make videos of still photos in order to get any visibility.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 27 points 1 month ago

Interesting watching social media turn into... Just media. Nothing social about it anymore, It's little bite sized chunks of infotainment.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Traditional media was nothing like this. It wasn't so granular, it couldn't create individual realities for individual users.

The websites we use have the power to determine whether we believe in genocides or not or if we know the civics of our own community.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

Instagram should have been a weed delivery service

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Likewise, AirDrop should have been a drone-based delivery service. Maybe they could partner up!

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I thought AirDrop was a service for scuba divers

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

"Drop" in my language is a word for "a person you KYC everything shady on" - kinda like a "money mule" in English, but way broader. So...

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

Ugh. I hope they clearly flag AI content and allow users to filter it.

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

I was thinking the same, but then thought, no, let the platform burn down with faked videos now, so that we get some kind of “Generated with AI” watermark requirement by law on all future videos to prevent destabilising society.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

They already require you to tag content made with AI.

[-] Link@rentadrunk.org 1 points 1 month ago

AI will eventually get so good that you won’t be able to tell if it is AI or not so the tag will become unenforceable.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

If it's so good that it's impossible to tell from human-made content then it literally doesn't matter wether it's real or not as there's no difference.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

How about they make the app stop refreshing my feed when I have to put the phone down for a second? Got real tired of losing what I was looking at when I re-opened it. I stopped using Instagram because of it.

this is gonna pump out racism, antisemitism and 9/11 content, isn't it.

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
222 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

61151 readers
1485 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS