3

Summary

Despite broken promises like the return of factory jobs, Donald Trump continues to gain support in Ohio’s rust belt, including Youngstown, a former Democratic stronghold.

Voters feel abandoned by both parties but resonate with Trump’s anti-establishment rhetoric and perceived authenticity.

Economic decline, disillusionment with political elites, and anger over issues like trade deals and student debt forgiveness fuel their frustration.

Many voters believe Trump’s willingness to “tear down the system” aligns with their grievances, even as doubts remain about his solutions.

Their bitterness reflects decades of industrial decline and neglect.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Perceived authenticity.... fucking morons

[-] noahm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

They're not morons. Trump, Musk, super PACs, and the GOP are spending collosal amounts of money to mislead them. It's not their fault that it's working.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't care how much propaganda and polished ads you put in front of me. If you can't see Trump for the sleazeball narcissist conman that he is after a DECADE of near constant televised and tweeted unfiltered rants from this dickhead, along with his actual actions when he was in office before, you are a fucking moron. Period. When the guy himself says "I'm going to commit atrocities" and his propaganda machine says "he meant that metaphorically, or he was joking, or he was saying that just to trigger the libs, or he meant it but not the way it sounds, etc.", and then the guy says "no I meant exactly what I said. I will commit atrocities. Bad ones!" You can't go "Well geez, I'm hearing all sorts of conflicting information in the media. Who knows what you can believe? I'll just assume that he meant whatever is most agreeable to me," unless you're a dumbass.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They literally were wearing diapers for Trump. It's a cult and cult-thinking.

Yes, if you get drawn into a cult, it does say some sad things about you as a person, how undeveloped you are, and how much you desire to be accepted as part of a group above all else. Getting drawn into a cult means you probably seriously lack interpersonal skills, and thus acceptance of any type is a joyous gift to you, even if the acceptance comes from horrible people. Cults prey on these kind of people for a reason.

I'm with you, there's no excuses at this point, it's a kind of mental sickness and it needed to be addressed years ago.

[-] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

"The establishment" is the only thing keeping red states going...

[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So I am not familiar with us elections but arent there other candidates then democrats and republicans? Like 3rd party? If they don't think trump will deliver, but dislike democrats, can they not vote someone else? Or spoil ballot? Here we also ended up with so far pretty useless labour but at the very least doing nothing is better than more years under conservatives or worse, racists that musk is keen to promote these days.

Here we have a choice of either useless labour or retarded fucktards, so I vote 3rd party. At least it fucking shows not everyone is looking at the two main ones. But looking at our shit turn out, we have similar apathy

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A functional voting system that allowed for the success of third parties in the United States would be great. Unfortunately, without ranked choice voting, voting for a third party candidate just means splitting the vote for one's next-preferred candidate. The most recent example of this would be George H. W. Bush's re-election loss in 1992, due in part to Ross Perot's popularity as a third-party candidate.

As things stand, the pragmatic choice is therefore to vote for the lesser of two evils. While I'd vote for a third-party candidate in a heartbeat if they had a realistic chance of winning, when the choice is a isolationist, corrupt, bigoted felon or anyone else, the easy choice is anyone else.

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Stupid people voting against their own best interests isn't news.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

They complain about jobs being industrial decline due to the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, but then blame inflation on efforts to increase the minimum wage to a living wage, rather than corporate profit-gouging.

While many of them might not mind living in a country with a class of underpaid manufacturing workers—presumedly the undocumented immigrants they simultaneously want to deport—the better option is to invest in economic development that bolsters the country's modern service economy, or specialized manufacturing facilities that can compete without needing ineffective tariffs.

And when Trump implements those tariffs, rather than recognizing their role in inevitable price increases, those same people will instead blame underpaid workers, inevitable counter-tariffs, or anyone else but Trump.

They also won't recognize that any economic growth in the next four years won't benefit them in the slightest, but rather go straight into the pockets of those responsible for outsourcing jobs in the first place. All the while supporting them, with anyone else just needing to 'pull themselves up' with imaginary bootstraps.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Things aren't fine. Anywhere. 2 years ago. 4 years ago. 10 years ago.

It isn't about the solutions to these people, and why should it be? Both sides have been in power, neither side made a material difference to the situation of the general population in the rust belt.

So all that's even left to resonate is tone, and at least the "This country has been ruined" message from the R's at least aligns broadly with the general angst.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Too bad it’s the R’s that fucking helped ruin it. Fucking idiots vote for the very people that screwed then in the first place and then convinced them how bad things have gotten.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not going to say both sides are equal, they aren't.

But, look at this graph and I think you'll clearly see the differences between R and D control of the government.

Or, you won't, and see that regardless of who's been in government, there has been almost no impact on real wages while productivity continues to climb.

OBVIOUSLY wages aren't the only measure of how things are going, and OBVIOUSLY To leadership has made many things meaningfully worse for many people.

But like, there are some GLARING issues that are responsible for a massive chunk of people's unhappiness and neither party has the balls to do anything about it so they're both just running identity politics playbooks. It's pathetic.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I can get it. These were dyed in the wool democrats, or at least their parents were. The Democrat party hung them out to dry with free trade, and abandoned them through ineptitude or unwillingness to resist decades of Republican strong arm politics, and relied on them as a reliable bloc the whole time.

It's not a choice I could make, but to denegrate working people for having literally no place to turn doesn't seem like it's been working out.

It's the party's duty to serve the people. If they don't do that it's dumb to expect anything in return. Republicans got lucky/had crazy good strategy with making Jesus a Republican. They're lying, but it's working.

Parading around the Cheney family? One upping Republicans on all their talking points on immigration and Israel? Those of that voted against trump sure as shit didn't vote for the Democrats, we just voted for Republican lite.

If the democratic party wants to do something about it, they're going to have to start by differentiating the left from the right.

Trump just called everyone assholes and won the presidency twice.

I don't get how anyone thought voting trump was a good idea. I understand where they're coming from even if I don't get how they got there.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20345 readers
1210 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS