38
submitted 2 days ago by OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Binette@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Disabilities' rights. If we grow old, we're gonna be dealing with some type of disability one way or an other. Sometimes it happens earlier. Plus, helping disabled people can sometimes also help non disabled people by making their lives easier.

A lot of problems, such as homelessness and increase in illness is caused by disability. People not being able to work anymore, or even work not being able to accomodate their needs cause homelessness. Covid basically making a lot of people immuncompromised, yet no work is being done to encourage people wearing masks by the government or other influencial entities.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When you pop a balloon, the helium floats to space and is lost into the solar wind forever. Unlike every other element we could run out, and nobody cares. (Helium is important for a lot of serious things, too)

There's more pressing issues, of course, but if you want one that's very unknown compared to it's long-term significance, there you go.

[-] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's abundant on the moon. It can be mined. There's another space race going on. We don't hear about it because the west isn't winning. And we're in the middle of another cold war where propaganda must control the narrative.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 hours ago

Last I heard, the West was still on course to be on the moon first (again).

On the moon there's specifically small but valuable amounts of adsorbed Helium 3, which is far rarer yet on Earth. It's not going to displace the normal Helium in use.

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I have goodish news. We aren't going to run out of helium any time soon.

Based on current rates of helium consumption the US alone has something like 250+ years of stored helium. We pumped a porous mountain full of all the helium we could back in the 60s and it's been kept stable since.

We still have no alternative to helium in a few of its most important use cases, but there is price where the helium we haven't bothered collecting will become cost effective to go get. Those untapped reserves are estimated 3-10 times what we have ever used.

I'm also fairly certain that we will have figured out a way to produce helium in the next hundred years. We know how it came to exist naturally it's really just the matter of someone being crazy enough to try and replicate those underground conditions and spend the money on the project.

I have faith that helium is a solvable problem for the human race.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Because of how entirely permanent this is, it pays to look far - like millions of years. That's what it took to accumulate.

We know how it came to exist naturally it’s really just the matter of someone being crazy enough to try and replicate those underground conditions and spend the money on the project.

How that works is just normal radioactive decay. The conditions aren't actually important.

It's probable we'll be able to make a bit with fusion, but the amounts will be small. IIRC we also collect some from decaying radioactive things in manmade settings, but again, it's hard to beat an chunk entire planet underneath a salt dome. Next options are harvesting it from space (but it's really spread out) or a gas giant (but there's stupid amounts of gravity).

[-] murmelade@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The sun has shitloads, we could mine the sun!

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just take a scoop out and bring it back. Should be easy right? Lol

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 days ago

I would like to pitch the idea that the obesity epidemic is a symptom of failed city infrastructure. Imagine if riding a bike was a no-friction activity; you walk out your door, you have a bike there and the bike lanes are treated as first-class infra instead of cars. Imagine how much more you would bike in this situation, and how much healthier you and everyone around you would be

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

Not just obesity, but also the loneliness epidemic, since mental health is boosted as much by the weak relationships of the people that one sees regularly, day-to-day, whose name one might not even know, as it is by close, intimate relationships. (And even the latter are suffering the loss of social contact.)

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago

You’re trying to find a problem for your solution.

The obesity epidemic actually due to the increased availability of ultra processed foods.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As well as a massive car-centric society. I can't even walk to Jack in the Box at 10pm to get a shit burger, but I can drive thru with a car. That's part of the problem.

If you make something easier to do, it's more likely to be done. This is why gun control is needed, make it harder to get a gun, less gun death; snacks at the checkout means more buying of snacks; driveways and parking lots and drive thrus mean more car use.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

This is only tangentially related, but I just wanted to share a random anecdote.

I ordered a mobile pickup order at my local Taco Bell with their app. Since it's nearby, I walked there and I had selected in store pickup. I walked inside and waited for a few moments. The manager comes out and this interaction happens.

Manager: "Inside was supposed to be closed. Idk who unlocked the door but you have to go through the drive through"

Me: "Oh uhh I already paid for an in store pickup through the app."

Manager: "You have to go through the drive through."

Me: "Uhhh....can I walk through the drive through? I walked here."

The manager looks at me in total disbelief that someone would do that. "You don't have a car???"

Me: "I mean I just walked here."

Manager: "Ok hold on I'll get your order."

Lol. She looked at me like she had never heard of anyone walking some place to get some food lol. Granted I live literally a 5 minute walk from there which is probably not really the norm.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago

As a lifelong bike commuter who's fifty pounds overweight and prediabetic, this isn't the cure-all you seem to think.

It'd be great, but it won't be enough.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

One of the reasons I don't think I'll ever want to live outside of NYC. I walk every day. Sometimes take a bike. It's much nicer than the car world of the suburbs I grew up in

[-] golli@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

That might certainly be one factor, but my intuition is that the primary driver is still todays diet. Things like soda drinks that let you consume teaspoons of pure sugar in an instant without appropriate feedback simply didn't exist in the past.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Or walking. I've been to a few US cities, and the common denominator for all of them is that walking anywhere isn't really an option. Sure, you can't always walk A to B in most cities, but at least European cities have public transit to cut down on the distance, necessitating only two short walks to and from a transit station.

Observation: Saudi Arabia is heading down a Houstonian path. There was one pedestrian bridge near me, and outside of that one, getting anywhere involved strategic jaywalking to cross freeways. At least they seem to have a decent bus network, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Overpopulation.

It used a problem that was talked about a lot in the latest century. Then some countries reduced their nativity by their own and it was marked as "it's going to solve itself".

Problem is, population keeps growing worldwide. Even in these countries with reduced nativity, population keeps growing via immigration.

Also the main drive on reduced nativity was increase of the quality of life and feminism. I think both things are in danger. Quality of life has been descending in later years, and feminism is being eaten by an increase in religious madness all across the world.

So I think overpopulation is still going strong and it will keep going stronger. And it will be a self induced problem, because overpopulation will reduce quality of life, and a reduced quality of life will make people breed more.

I actually think is the number one problem, way more dangerous that climate change. Because, among other things, there's nothing more polluting than a human being, the more humans in this Earth the more impossible will be fight back climate change. Humans pollute.

And the worst is that no one cares about this issue, and people tend to become very violent when you mention it as a problem.

[-] pip@slrpnk.net 3 points 19 hours ago

The thing about that though, is that to reduce the population in the least invasive, most peaceful way, is progress. And I mean progress in the geographical locations that are currently being kept from progressing. Human rights and progressive ideas, better healthcare, worker's rights; these are all crucial to achieving lower birthrates. It's an intersectional problem, always has been, always will be.

[-] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I worry that with declining birth rates capitalism will fall. OK maybe that is a good thing.

[-] SelfHigh5@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I totally agree, it’s alarming to see the projections of population growth. It seems unsustainable and I fear the consequences will be catastrophic. I think about this every time I see a news piece about declining birth rates or countries incentivising procreation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alice@beehaw.org 26 points 2 days ago

The USA's two-party system is a fucking farce and we're not going to see major, widespread change under either party. But if I bring this up I get called a "Russian bot" and accused of telling people not to vote... even though I vote.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

Speaking of real, the USA is not a law of nature. It's only been around for a short time, historically, and it took a bloody civil war to keep it going this long. The warning that we have to vote for the correct color every time, or the country falls apart, is wrong. Voting for the correct color and the country still falls apart is possible if that color can't make the fundamental changes needed.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago

Don't worry (/s), I think you're down to one now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Trans people will be murdered over bathroom laws. You want a masculine bearded guy in the women's room? That's exactly what anti-trans bathroom laws require. Those guys are gonna get shot.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Which is stupid, since unisex bathrooms already exist. It shouldn't be hard to install those in every single new building everywhere.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

We call them "Woke DEI Bathrooms" now.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Or, hear me out, we repeal the laws and trans people just continue using the bathroom of their choosing like we've been doing without issue for decades.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Gender neutral bathrooms are great anyway. We don't actually need gendered shit receptacles.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Remember in the 2000's before gay marriage was legal a lot of people would suggest elimination of the word marriage and just call everything civil unions to appease religious objections?

That's what eliminating gendered bathrooms sounds like. Gay and straight people enjoy being married. Trans and cis people enjoy their gendered privacy that makes them feel safer. I believe you're intentions are good but removing a universal cultural norm isn't the solution. It's side stepping the issue of transphobia, exactly like whites only bathrooms sidesteped racism.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 2 days ago

Amazing how this basic solution is always omitted... Leta do 10 years of culture wars!!!!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 14 points 2 days ago

Class struggle and the institutionalized corruption that the owner class is deploying against working people.

Bootlickers' pathological behaviours that support the owner class narratives as they larp what they hear on teevee

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Especially the devoid of empathy billionaires who are just growing parasites, sucking the blood out of the planet and all of us.

[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

That the 105 male/100 female birth to young adult ratio needs a fix to get to 100/100 at least.

The distraction comes from me being not too kind to either of the duo-culture of the US empire on this issue.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I thought female birth ratio was higher than males

[-] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

No, slightly more AMABs get born than AFABs. Over time the difference cancels out, as AMABs tend to die a bit more sooner.

[-] Gjolin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

By itself this is not that big of an issue. A much bigger issue is the gender imbalance that you find in certain localities due to local governments, universities and companies not taking this gender imbalance into account. But I'm glad that you brought up this issue.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
38 points (95.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44330 readers
1175 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS