The main foreign interference, which is clearer now than ever, is from the anti-Canadian large social media network owners peddling influence on us.

She did note that there are legitimate concerns about some parliamentarians potentially having problematic relationships with foreign officials, exercising poor judgment, behaving naively and perhaps displaying questionable ethics.

"But I did not see evidence of parliamentarians conspiring with foreign states against Canada," the report concludes.

"While some conduct may be concerning, I did not see evidence of 'traitors' in Parliament."

This is encouraging, but there needs to be a mechanism for these "problematic relationships" to be brought out into the public sphere (without it becoming a witch hunt).

Just sounds like the definition of traitor was made so tight as to not apply to anyone.

Current Example of a traitor - any Canadian who thinks the US should either annex or try and court Canada into becoming a state.

No matter their performative differences, politicians will always protect each other regardless of party affiliation.