140
submitted 11 months ago by micnd90@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

"In short, Detroit is drifting further and further from the starter car, while factories in China are specializing in it. Just don’t expect the latter to solve for the former anytime soon."

https://archive.ph/xYi2U

There is a bit of union blaming in the article, but it is an overall good article. Basically import taxes, tariffs, and anti-Chinese political sentiment prevent us from having sub $20k EV car.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 69 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Beyond predictable. This is simply protectionism designed to artificially stifle competition since the US and EU cannot compete.

Not only that, they will fight to the death before they let anyone benefit from Chinese liberation from the oppressive tyranny of Western companies.

Expect to see this with phones, CPUs and GPUs and virtually every other relevant breakthrough technologies coming out of China that have the potential to somewhat alleviate the struggle of poverty.

As always, it's just class war playing itself out. They will always try and cancel the future.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago

Here in the UK the chinese gpus are appearing. I noticed that the Colorful gpus are available in some places here, including ebay, and they're CHEAP.

[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I noticed that the Colorful gpus are available in some places here, including ebay, and they're CHEAP.

This is pretty cool. Definitely something to keep an eye on, since I want to upgrade.

I just expect that when 100% indigenous Chinese technologies fully surpass Western equivalents from Intel, AMD, Nvidia, that the West will go full Gandalf and not allow easy access for their populations.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Look here at sold listings on uk ebay:

Colorful 3060? £165 new

Colorful 4070ti? £600 - £650 new

If I head over to amazon to look up prices, a 4070ti is £800-900. These Chinese gpus are getting into the UK and are almost 33% cheaper than everything else. The quantity of them isn't high because I assume these are individual imports some sellers are doing or something. But their price is no joke.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Those are still using Nvidia chips. The Moore threads GPUs are completely Chinese, and they're not there yet, but they're on the way.

[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

madeline-shock Damn these are good prices. Definitely want!

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago

I want them to flood the market and force the price of everything else down to compete lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

Is there some good material on protectionism from a Marxian perspective? I'm questioning my own views on the subject. If only the US was using protectionism as a measure to maintain high wages in its factories of internationally overpriced commodities, that'd be a pretty good thing, right? Similar to how China's Great Firewall functions as a digital protectionist measure to foster a domestic tech industry that isn't dominated by FAANG like how the internet developed in the rest of the periphery. But it seems like there's a lot of nuances here, like how the West uses protectionism to maintain hegemony.

[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Is there some good material on protectionism from a Marxian perspective?

Unsure of this, but would also like to know if anyone does happen to have something.

If only the US was using protectionism as a measure to maintain high wages in its factories of internationally overpriced commodities, that'd be a pretty good thing, right?

It wouldn't work long-term. They'd cut the workforce down to the minimum skeleton crew needed to run production and overwork those people. Plus, with China being more competitive in both quality and price, they'd be overtaking US equivalents regardless. US industry itself is dying, and it's irreversible. The falling rate of profit demands lower quality for higher price tags, and the US hasn't been investing into R&D on a level anywhere close to the Chinese, so they have no future in this race.

China's Great Firewall functions as a digital protectionist measure to foster a domestic tech industry that isn't dominated by FAANG like how the internet developed in the rest of the periphery.

Well, here's the thing about the Great Firewall: Yes, indeed it was so they could foster a domestic tech industry, but it was also a strategic move to attain sovereignty in their information space and protect them from Western manipulation in China's internal affairs. See this relatively short video here. It's not so similar in that with EVs, people need reliable transportation to survive in the West as they have no high-speed rail networks. With the price of gas, auto repairs and maintenance always going up, these EVs could liberate working class people from dependence on much of the US' fossil fuel and automaker giants, which the US absolutely will not tolerate.

The US demands a population as desperate as possible to reduce worker bargaining power, increase employer leverage, and maintain their monopolies.

But it seems like there's a lot of nuances here, like how the West uses protectionism to maintain hegemony.

That's entirely and always what this is about.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Right, exactly, thanks for this detailed explanation. I wrote the first point specifically because I saw how that contradicted the situation at hand, but it is what I previously believed about protectionism. Also thank you for the video, really captivating explanation there.

[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Right, exactly, thanks for this detailed explanation.

Of course.

I wrote the first point specifically because I saw how that contradicted the situation at hand, but it is what I previously believed about protectionism.

Yep, just wanted to reinforce your second thoughts on the matter as being valid.

Also thank you for the video, really captivating explanation there.

stalin-approval

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 47 points 11 months ago

They had a story on the news about "Chinese electric cars going to waste! Inept Chinese government over produces electric cars!!!!1!!"

Lmao can't make this shit up.

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

I saw one but turns out it was those ride share startups going bankrupt and their fleet of hundreds of EVs needed to be stored somewhere as a result.

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 11 months ago

I find it amusing there's an advert for the new Chevrolet that basically claims it's designed as a "first new car"

Instead of a sensible Mirage or Accent sized sedan or hatchback, or an EV that could get the price bought down with government incentives, it's a bloaty SUV that's over twenty-six thousand dollars as pictured.

[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago

A sub-20k EV!? Good lord, sign me up.

[-] micnd90@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago

The BYD Seagull is 73,800 yuan, or roughly $10,183

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

You can get cheap chinese micromobility vehicles though

[-] regul@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

For now. I expect NYC's recent UL testing requirement for e-mobility batteries will be adopted by more US cities out of a combination of anti-China hysteria and the demographics involved.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

To be fair, some of those batteries are sketchy as frig (looking at you gotway/begode)

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 8 points 11 months ago

Is there anything stopping Chinese companies from getting these certifications? Or are they just inherently unsafe and can't get them?

[-] regul@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

There's nothing stopping Chinese companies from getting them other than extra cost. And as they serve a global market rather than just the US, the loss of business might not be worth it to the Chinese companies, considering how large the domestic segment is. Like why bear all the extra cost of UL cert for the NY market (or even the US market) when you can continue selling to China, SEA, India, etc. There's a CBA to be done there and I don't imagine it results in these companies shelling out.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

Makes sense, thanks for the explainer

[-] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

Like what? You mean like one of those little changli truck bois that can only go like bicycle speeds?

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

Escooters, electric unicycles, ebikes, eskate, that kind of thing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, not that those aren't useful in some capacity, there's the question of hauling groceries and such home, not to mention we need protection from the elements with increasingly brutal summers, and also violent thunderstorms. There's the question of these things being able to trek through deep snow too, to consider.

I guess you could just fit it with baskets and wear a big backpack... but honestly, how far down the hole do we have to go here?

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

Carbrain from a hexbear, for shame.

I'll start you on some basic NotJustBikes

Groceries

Snow

[-] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

Carbrain from a hexbear, for shame.

This one line is heavily assuming that the above poster lives in a urban area, meanwhile they could be someone like me who lives out in essentially a rural area. In my particular case I live in one of the many 'rural cities' (and one that's doing "better" than a grand majority of them) the populate the US outside of your big cities.

Honestly it feels that rural areas just keep being a huge glaring blind spot for most everyone here.

[-] sicklemode@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

Thank you for the provided resources. Many of the things I've been concerned about were addressed.

However, there's something I want to clear up here.

Carbrain from a hexbear, for shame.

I'd like to know what your thought process was that caused you to start off with this, so I can address it.

I'm not the type that particularly likes car-centric planning and car-centric infrastructure. I've understood that walkable communities were much easier and less stressful, less expensive, and more efficient in saving on fuel costs and environmental impact for quite some time.

I simply have concerns, which should be understandable, and I want to resolve those concerns in good faith.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

The thought process was essentially just "this is the type of post I've seen a thousand times from redditors and @lemm.ee users."

Worries about things like groceries and snow are extremely common themes of car centric reaction post, and I've seen posts much like yours countless times both back on reddit-logo and on the wider lemmy whenever I mention bicycles or electric micromobility.

[-] spitfire@infosec.pub 11 points 11 months ago

The biggest obstacle as an American who has lived in Europe that I see is our infrastructure. You can live comfortably fine your entire life without owning a vehicle in most of Europe. Public transportation isn’t disgusting and is on time. There are many many times more options for travel. But in Europe, they have the advantage of having civilizations living in the area for hundreds, even thousands of years in some spots. This causes the towns to become more compact as there is limited land available compared to the states. Major cities such as Chicago or New York could adopt something like this, but the vast majority of people don’t live in these cities. Instead the towns are expanded and vast in comparison. It’s not uncommon at all to work in a different town, have your kids go to school in a different town, etc.

I work in construction, I and most of the others in my area commute daily. I cannot take public transportation because 1. It doesn’t exist in any area nearby where I’ve worked. And 2. Even if it did, it doesn’t run at 4AM when I’m helping create the cluster of traffic on the highways. I was spending $1300/month in diesel to commute my Truck. I’ve since purchased a Tesla Long Range. While it is somewhat cheaper, it’s not a major difference, but more importantly I have to be extremely careful with my driving and charging. I have to make sure I charge every evening and if I only commute to and from work without additional stops, I’m looking at 20% charge left. This is on the long range model. On top of that, it’s almost half the price to charge from a supercharger than it is from Home due to the power companies having a monopoly. The battery isn’t supposed to be used on a supercharger daily, isn’t supposed to be charged more than 80% daily, and isn’t supposed to be drained to less than 20% daily. Degradation is a huge unforeseen problem in the market. Solar is ridiculously expensive and the majority of families aren’t homeowners.

I’m all for going electric and car free, but we aren’t going to be truly capable for another decade or two.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

See, @sicklemode@hexbear.net this is the type of carbrain I thought you were.

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

Don't be rude and don't waste my time filing mod reports just because you don't agree with something.

[-] spitfire@infosec.pub 11 points 11 months ago

lol feel free to rebuttal all of my completely valid points instead of reverting to name calling. If you actually read the comment , it’s pretty clear I’m not but okay 🙄

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ok I'm gonna start a struggle session here. Bikes aren't practical in America atleast atm because:

  1. We're not a perfectly flat glorified city state like the Netherlands

  2. Certain subcultures in the US will literally try to kill you with their car if they see you riding a bike on the road.

  3. Bikeseats are uncomfortable.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago
  1. Ebikes

  2. Kill them first

  3. Skill issue

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago
[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

There is a bit of union blaming in the article the-podcast

[-] NoisyOwl@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

I really wanted to get a Chinese plug-in hybrid, but it's impossible to get them approved to actually drive on US roads.

[-] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

There has to be some loophole we can take advantage of. Do we need to put a big shitty spoiler in it so we can register it in one of those states that exist to launder tuned cars?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

At this rate I'm just going to get myself an electric moped and put a lightweight "car" frame around it so car-brained americans actually respect me on the road.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

If they are anything like their shirts, I won’t be able to fit into one.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

news

23407 readers
966 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS