136
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

The Justice Department's decision to dismiss bribery charges against NYC Mayor Eric Adams has led to a wave of resignations, tripling those of the 1973 "Saturday Night Massacre."

Six senior officials, including Manhattan U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, stepped down in protest, citing concerns over political interference.

Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove ordered the dismissal, arguing the case was "weaponization" of the justice system.

Legal experts see parallels to past executive overreach, raising alarm over the independence of the Southern District of New York.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

Oh God. Do you realize where we're going?

Elongate.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Or fElongate to be more precise.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nope theirs was more clever

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Can't spell FELON without ELON! 🤣

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Omfg…. 😂 Now THAT is clever!

[-] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

These people need to understand this quickly, like yesterday: This whole "protesting by stepping down" thing, doesn't help a damn thing. These mass resignations only embolden the shitheads to continue breaking the law with no fear of reprisal

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah I have to say, this is probably what they want, then they can replace people who pose a real threat with loyalists. If anything, pretend to be on board while sabotaging them at every opportunity

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

When demonstrating against a larger power, one can only use the tools at one's disposal.

Or would you rather they stay and change the system from within, ie: evolution over disruption ... which would take time, patience, ability and maneuvering to keep their jobs in the first place.

The tool they should be using is saying "fuck off". If you want to go to the top, you need to have responsibility.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Say it with me: "No."

No is extremely powerful magic, especially if you embrace it completely.

[-] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

YES. This whole performative "Me stepping down and letting some right wing stooge replace me will really inspire people" bullshit has to come to an end. They're just conceding defeat, fucking forfeiting, when that's the last goddamned thing we need from our civil servants! .. you're not fucking helping!

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

COOL. Cool. cool. Doesn't this mean they will just get replaced by people that fall in line with corruption?

[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

just a bump in the road. bondi gonna fire those who doesn't anyway.

[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah - but when future generations (if there are any) appraise this time frame at least these folk will be seen as being outside and opposed to the oligarch-fascist take over.

[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Probably, but what else can they do? Someone that goes along with the corruption is worse than someone in on the corruption. At least the latter cost money.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

They could quietly be a nuisance and gather or even leak information, just off the top of my head.

[-] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Ive been wanting to replay luigi's mansione lately

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I've been on a BioShock 3 kick myself

[-] Garlicsquash@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago

Resignations are no longer working. They are not shaming people into doing the right things. They just allow the corrupt to carry out their actions unimpeded.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Staying is a career killer. You stay, it means you're on board with this shit. You can leave and your next employer will see it as a good reason.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I find it fascinating that there are still regular references to Watergate in American political reporting/commentary. It just doesn't seem relevant.

From my contacts with Americans, it seems that anti-trump Americans are in a state of shock (understandable), but still clinging to the hope that their institutions will save them (debatable considering global examples with the rise of authoritarian/corporate regimes in democratic environments; generally a "second term" tends to be a make or break period).

The pro-trump group seems to be doubling down on trump and even low key trying to justify statements like the Gaza annexation proposal by claiming "that's just Trump, he says things." Some of the stuff I've heard honestly made me a bit uncomfortable (these are people I know well for 15+ years) and I don't discuss internal US matters with the pro-trump camp.

[-] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Watergate was a really big deal. By all accounts, it still technically is. It’s pretty blatant corruption and was cartoonishly executed. That said, what’s happening now is under the guise of “making America greater.”

The players are equally cartoonish goons (Anthony Scaramucci? Guilliani? Steve Bannon? His entire administration was toon town) but Trump is slimier than Nixon and is great at getting people to do his bidding for access. The deluge of news and control of the narrative they have has greatly played into their hand. They figured out how to rig the modern media machine. Nixon could never have done that.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Watergate is about as far back as the average person can connect the historical dots. My view is that it goes much further back, to slavery itself - but many still view Watergate as some kind of original sin.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Watergate is as far as you can draw a direct line. That's when Roger Ailes really started working on right-wing television. That got us Fox News, and here we are today.

[-] Azal@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Watergate is as far as you can draw a direct line.

I'd say Nixon administration as a whole. They picked up the dixiecrats post Civil Rights movement. Look up Nixon's political Strategist Kevin Phillips and his discussion on the Southern Strategy where it was specifically targeting the racist whites to bring them into the Republican party.

But then that's the part where I can say goes all the way back to slavery, but hey, if you grew up in the South the Civil War was never quite over even to modern era. But I'd definitely say the Southern Strategy the Republicans put into place would be where I'd say the beginning of drawing a direct line to where we're at now.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We started naming every scandal [name]-Gate after it so it's still in the public conscious and only one sitting US president has ever left their term early due to scandal.

Of course the rules are different now. Impeachment and removal (or resignation to avoid it) are almost impossible with the current state of Congress. So we can only say "This might have been as big as the Watergate scandal if we still had any ethics as a country."

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

It’s a stupid name if convention.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Came here to post the Reuters article "US prosecutors formally ask judge to drop case against NY mayor Eric Adams", but saw that it's already posted.

I'll just quote a part from the other article and add some comments about it:

"The pending prosecution has unduly restricted Mayor Adams' ability to devote full attention and resources to ... illegal immigration and violent crime," Bove, Trump's former personal lawyer and a political appointee, wrote in the memo seen by Reuters.

Essentially, they are sending a letter to a court of law saying "we're playing politics, don't distract us with your laws". I think that should be named "political corruption" and "obstruction of justice".

Fortunately not everyone was spineless:

"I am confident that Adams has committed the crimes with which he is charged," Sassoon wrote on Wednesday in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi seen by Reuters. "I cannot agree to seek a dismissal driven by improper considerations."

My viewpoint:

  • resignation is not the best way to deal with a fascist takeover, resistance would be better (and every political firing of a resisting prosecutor should come with a court case attached)
  • letting politicians directly influence prosecutors (to stop cases before they go to court) presents massive opportunities for political corruption
  • fortunately this case has already gone to court, so next they will be putting pressure on the judge, who is better protected against influence
  • if corruption trials should become unfeasible, or feasible only for unimportant or opposition-minded persons, there's not much point in having a legal system
[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

America has lost their moral compass. Sorry to say, but USA might never be the same. I invited everyone to read a little about how societies and empires have collapsed. Spoiler alert, starts gradually and then move fairly fast.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Republicans. Republicans have lost their moral compass (if they ever really have one, and that's debatable).

Remember: most of the nation did not vote for these fuckers.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We need to disallow allow any elected Official, or anyone they appoint, to have or even talk about anything to do with the Justice Department.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

With all the screeching Republicans do about Democratic corruption, you think Trump would treat prosecuting Adams like a slam dunk.

It really is like Trump is embracing corruption as a matter of policy.

[-] TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes but then they'll just put another Democrat in his place. This way he has one he can force into doing his bidding holding charges above his head.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, but today’s republicans-at-large are mindless automatons, devoid of any mental processing; and those in government are traitors, unworthy of the oxygen they draw.

So, nothing will happen, except by extraordinary means. The American system is a cunt hair’s breadth from failure.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
136 points (99.3% liked)

News

25243 readers
1505 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS