1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by 11111one11111@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

What would it take for the Goliath to be the hero and David to be the pessimist? Not just in fictional narrative depictions but throught history too. The only scenario I can think of that kinda fits the mold was 9/11. Where America may not of been the hero or "good guy" but the underdog Taliban was unanimously viewed as the "bad guys." I'm not super knowledgeable when it comes to global geopolitical relations so I'm all ears for any scenarios that prove otherwise and would love to hear them.

Edit: I am loving all the responses and its a great conversation, I just wish I phrased the title differently so it wasn't getting downvoted. I didn't mean for it to come accross like I didn't think it ever happened.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Misspelledusernme@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

By the end of ww2, the nazis were the underdogs.

[-] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The challenge isn't finding counter examples, it's limiting the narrative of history to have a simple "good/bad divide" but here are some selections of underdogs one may consider the greater of two evils:

  • The confederacy (US Civil War)
  • Caesar's army crossing the Rubicon
  • Imperial Japan post Pearl Harbor
  • Pakistan's complicated history with India
  • King Leonidas and his men (Persia was arguably more equitable)
  • Austria-Hungary (WW1)
  • Fascist Italy (WW2)

As for David and Goliath, keep in mind David was using a sling, a weapon that can hit with the same force as a modern revolver when used properly. It's entirely possible that story is an allegory and/or propaganda of the value of properly equipping one's armies; it probably shouldn't be viewed as anymore impressive than a rampage killer fatally wounding somebody twice their size

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Fuck yeah the civil war is exactly thr type of scenario i knew i couldn't think of. I fuckin love that you also gave me a list of historical events I'm not super familiar with to look up too. Thank you for this comment🍻

[-] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The reason stories exist of the underdog winning, is because the underdogs lose almost all the time.

Think of how common a story it is that a Walmart being built in a small town basically shutters all the local businesses.

Also, David basically brought a gun to a knife fight against Goliath. Seems like Goliath should have been considered the underdog :3

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Confirmation Bias!

These make GREAT stories! These are the historical moments that get passed down.

So, we've got the tale of America breaking free from the British Empire, but you know what stories you haven't heard? All the times the British Empire took over and kept the land it stole from underdogs. You don't get called an Empire without multiple successful takeovers.

I think I forgot exactly what you were asking as I was typing, so this doesn't exactly fit the question.

[-] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 0 points 5 months ago

Don‘t you call a „bad“ underdog in other words? Just like gangster, criminal, activist, terrorist, …

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

"Low-life" and "scumbag" are kind of the shitty versions of underdogs.

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Melon Husk used to be the underdog of carmaker you know.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

I'm a little conflicted about Telon Cusk. I don't think the EV auto industry would be as far advanced today if not for his efforts; I think we'd have gotten here eventually, but maybe a decade or two later.

Same with the space industry. I wish that, instead, NASA would have been well-funded and space would have remained a science-first (with hidden military objectives; that was unavoidable) effort, but Tusk stepping in and pushing created a new space race where governments had failed.

He created neither Tesla nor SpaceX, nor was he the technical mind behind them; but his pumping money into them and his grandstanding did a lot to motivate other players in those industries.

Does that good outweigh his fundamental evil nature? Probably not. But he has been instrumental in some good advancements.

[-] iii@mander.xyz -1 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

36009 readers
177 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS