8
submitted 3 weeks ago by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

“Private browsing” on most browsers isn’t comprehensive or easy to use. Klar is next-level privacy that’s free, always on and always on your side — because it’s backed by Mozilla, the non-profit that fights for your rights on the Web.

i was using Focus as a quick less secure browser that doesn't break official websites. I uninstalled it after Mozilla's changes to terms of use/service.

Is Klar, like IronFox, a cleaned fork? If not, why is Guardian project serving it as next level privacy?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Klar has telemetry disabled by default, Focus has telemetry enabled by default.

About:config is disabled in both, so you cannot change anything that is not available in the settings.

It is an official version of Firefox, not a fork. It generally does not break things as it is basically Focus without telemetry.

It is not comparable to Mull (rip) or Ironfox

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

IronFox is my default now, after Mull. The question is not to compare the two browsers, but just the approach.

I need a second "delete data on quit" browser with JavaScript and cookies enabled for the obligatory official sites :/

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Focus and Klar are basically the same, except for the telemetry. Iirc Klar was created because having telemetry would possibly run afoul of some German data privacy laws.

Klar would be the pick of the two. You could also use a different fork that you used like focus where you set it to only use private browsing and delete data/cookies etc on quit.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

installed it after your previous comment and it's, like you wrote, basically Focus.

netGuard shows that Klar is constantly trying to connect to firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com & bc.googleusercontent.com

i guess it's for the "Phishing and Malware Protection" 🤷

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, that should be it. Firefox runs its own version of SafeBrowsing, but it falls back to Google if it sees something that is not in its database. Then it sends a hash to Google to check it.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago

Waiting for its ios port. Otherwise, sticking with Firefox Focus

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
8 points (83.3% liked)

Privacy

36474 readers
274 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS