18
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Death doesn’t even deter them. Definitely not a cult.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If they have any other children, these should be immediately taken away.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Sure. This clearly demonstrates a lack of appropriate parenting skills and child safety. CAS would be involved for lots of cases like that.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Everyone, point and laugh. Unfortunately, that’s the most anyone can do.

They won’t get indicted for child endangerment and criminal negligence because Paxton is in charge of that for TX, and Bondi is in charge of that now Federally, and they’re drinking the asbestos-flavored kool-aid.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The deceased girl’s father insisted that measles helps build up a person’s immune system. “Also the measles are good for the body for the people,” the father said, explaining “You get an infection out.”

Oh, I get it. I hate my little girl too.

/s
/jfc

[-] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

The deceased girl’s father insisted that measles helps build up a person’s immune system.

So here’s the thing…and I know that everyone here knows this, but it doesn’t.

Measles causes immune amnesia.

It’s pretty sneaky - integrating into respiratory tract macrophages, and avoiding destructive phagocytosis by binding directly to certain membrane receptors, and then being transported to lymph nodes where B and T cells get infected by the measles virus too. These memory B and T cells contain the memory of past infections, and when they’re destroyed (because they’re infected), you no longer have the ability to quickly ramp up a response to past infections and you get to start all over from the start.

So even if their other kids survived, their chances of dying from another infection goes up. It takes somewhere between 2.5 and 5 years for that risk to come back to baseline.

The infection itself might not have been “that bad” (despite killing one of their children) but the mortality risk isn’t over by a long shot.

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know you're being sarcastic, but...

They're Mennonites...

It's not that they don't love their kid. It's that they actually and truly love their religion and so-called God's Will more...

Yet more suffering and death brought to us by extremist religion.

🙄 🙄

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Mennonites (and Amish) aren't necessarily against vaccines. vaccination rates are low, but that has less to do with the vaccine and more just generally distrusting doctors (who have abused their trust.) Vaccines and modern health care aren't against their teachings.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

I've read an interview with the father of this dead child, and no, he's not against it for religious reasons. I'm sure his religion indoctrinated him into distrusting vaccines, but he is against it because he thinks that there are negative health consequences which are worse than the chance of death.

[-] The2b@lemmy.vg 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is this the after-birth abortion the Republicans were talking about?

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

She died horribly and her parents chose it for her.

The other children (some of the other children?) also got the measles and survived, which means their immune systems might be shot.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

It was only a girl that died. They might have cared if it was a BOY.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

“She says they would still say ‘Don’t do the shots,’” an unidentified translator for the parents said. “They think it’s not as bad as the media is making it out to be.”

Their child literally died. How could it have been worse, exactly?

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago

When you value your insane religion more than your literal child. People like this make me wish Hell was real, because they really deserve a one-way trip there.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And the absolute insane part about it is: most actual religions are not opposed to vaccination!

The pope doesn’t mind vaccination, and indeed encourages it:

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/10/1071785531/on-covid-vaccinations-pope-says-health-care-is-a-moral-obligation#%3A%7E%3Atext=Francis%2C+85%2C+has+generally+shied%2Cget+inoculated+was+%22suicidal.%22

Mormons encourage vaccination. Hindus and Buddhists have no issues with it. Most of Islam and Judaism are OK with it as well…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination_and_religion

So if most of your mainstream religions agree that vaccination is a good thing - one of the few things they agree on, I’d imagine -it doesn’t make sense to oppose it on religious grounds.

Some people just want to difficult. And kids are dying because of it.

No child deserves that. But given who they would have had to grow up with, they may have dodged a bullet of sorts.

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

i really do get your attempt to spin it this way, but .. honestly, no. dying of measles is not dodging a bullet. the child died.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Why aren’t they in prison?

Because unfortunately vaccination is a choice. So they didn't do anything wrong in the eyes of the law.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
18 points (95.0% liked)

News

28284 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS