374
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 72 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Watched it. The big takeaway for me came with this moment: the crowd starts chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" and Bernie stops them and says "NO! Not Bernie! I got bad news for you-- It's you!"

He's trying to get progressive people to run for office, any office, every office, wherever they can. I think it's probably the best possible play at the moment.

E: credit to Match!!@pawb.social for the correction on the quote

[-] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

"Not Bernie! I got bad news for you - it's YOU!"

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[-] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

of course! i was there, it was pretty fresh on my mind. i took public transit there and back, every bus and lightrail was packed with people talking about the rally

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Wanted to add that I'm doing my part to answer the call. What about you, reader?

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Americans have been so brainwashed by Hollywood, Jesus and superhero stories that they think one hero is going rise up to save them all.

No one is coming to save us. We only have each other.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] arotrios@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

34,000 patriots - a salute of respect to everyone in that picture.

Keep going! It's working - people are ready to march, despite what the mass media is reporting:

Link to full article from WagingNonViolence.org

[-] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

YOU NEED MORE PEOPLE!

DONT STOP!

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This. Build an army, 10 million strong! Waves upon waves! Let them try to contend with that!

[-] UnexpectedBehavior@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unless you change how elections work and how politics are funded a new party in the US will always be dead on arrival.

A Bernie - AOC party would face immense hurdles as they lack the infrastructure and the funds the Democratic party has in place. On top of that corporate and oligarchic interests would all make sure to put in enough funding to ensure they will fail.

I love the energy but you have to be realistic. Their best bet would probably be to reform the Democratic Party from the inside.

[-] BoulevardBlvd@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Not true. The system suppresses third parties. It doesn't stop them. Parties fall in the US just like everywhere else. When was the last time you spoke to a US whig? Or a Jeffersonian Republican? The system in place when those parties fell was exactly the system we have now. It just takes a massive popular effort and a period of severe political turmoil where the country is heavily divided along party lines and a large portion of the country feels entirely disenfranchised (ideally about a 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 split between the two parties and people fed up or greater). Happened at the revolution. Happened at the civil war. Happened at the great depression. Guess where we are now? Don't let yourself fall for the lie that the party is eternal. We're on the knive's edge now. It's time to push

Despite what the media wants us to think, both parties are wildly unpopular with their own voters and are primed for collapse. Literally all of the conditions historically needed for social revolution have been met

[-] gashead76@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Don't let yourself fall for the lie that the party is eternal.

Exactly. More people need to let go of the idea that the people cannot affect massive change like this. Of course change will never happen if you don't believe it's possible.

[-] WorkersCorps@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely agreed. First thing we have to try is to make the party reform themselves. AOC and Bernie have the formula already - the DNC needs a massive push. Like a concerted pressure campaign.

It's not going to be easy but fighting a lawless MAGA with Dems who seem to be stuck in 2012 would be much more difficult. At least now we have some hope because at least these two are out there building the support.

[-] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I think this is probably the only time a whole third party could spring up. The heavy handed approach of oligarchs has caused this.

Reforming the party is the same as making a third one because what you're reforming is oligarch interests. Corpo Dems don't want that. That's calling for a party split

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

So did Trump. None took him seriously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All splitting the left would accomplish is assuring Republicans never lose again. It's the inevitable result of a First Past the Post voting system.

The more effective way of doing things is to primary all the corporate Dems and reform the Democratic Party from within. AOC did it in her district and there's no reason it can't work in others.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

The Republicans are never going to lose again anyway. I am strongly suspicious of the outcome of the last election; there's enough evidence to warrant at least an independent investigation of the voting software in states with abnormal down-ballot voting. The Democrats no longer have a shred of power to pursue any opposition; they have that up when Kamala walked away from the discrepancies and Biden made no effort to investigate in his remaining time.

I do agree on principle that, with FPTP voting, you need to vote strategically for the least bad person who has any chance of winning. The game has changed, now, though. Republicans have stacked the courts and gerrymandered their states, ensuring no chance to investigate attempts to defraud elections. The Democrat party has been utterly impotent in combating this, and demonstrated an appalling incompetence at ensuring the the system remains incorrupted and uninfluenced by foreign interests. They've actively participated in Corporate influence with Citizens United and the Patriot Act. I voted Hillary, but fuck her for supporting that shit.

If there's a next election, and if there's a party with reasonable polling numbers comparable to the D party, I might vote for them. Otherwise, I'll vote D again.

But: the time to split or reform the party is now. Not at the general election, but now, while there's time to lay the groundwork and build momentum. Because overthrowing a dictator is going to take a lot of momentum, and the D party has none of it.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

This is exactly the message. I'm certain that's what AOC's point was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scottrepreneur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Dump first past the post voting! We need non-spoiler alternatives

[-] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hope you will manage to build an actually-social democrat party.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think for name recognition and not scaring off Americans who run in fear from the s word, maybe it should be called the Progressive Party?

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fuck their fear. We need to stop molding our identity around what old conservatives think. The youth aren’t scared of socialism, and they’re the people we need to reach. We need a party that will stand up for us, and that starts by not neutering ourselves to appease our opposition.

[-] deeferg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Will just getting the youth be enough to win the election though? You need as many voters as possible for that, and to not think strategically and in a way "play the game" then you're already dooming the party to fail.

If you start a party called "the socialist party" in the US, that would be the easiest attack spot for both parties to go after. Just doesn't make sense to start on your back foot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

I don't think the hardest part would be teaching the difference between historical socialism and social democracy, as used in Europe. Social democrat parties in Europe are often just called the "Socialist Party" (ex: France, Spain, with recent elected country leaders) and nobody associates them with the Soviet Union.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Now's the best time. Maybe even have a few candidates in for the next election cycle.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

not with this level of education and apathy. you make a new party, for everyone who's heard of it, there's going to be a thousand who haven't, and even if they see your name on the ballot and like you they'll just vote dem because they're gonna think that's what they should do.

remember that Google search for "did Biden drop out" peaked on election day, lots of people found out only when they saw the fucking ballot.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I personally think it's better to do it now than hear people bitching about needing an alternative to the DNC's kingmaker moves during the next election cycle. Just introduce the party and its candidates in some strategically selected districts where progressive policies are being demanded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

but which billionaire or world power will fund it??

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] Bieren@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I'm unsure if you realize how significant 34,000 people in one state capitol is.

All major protests and organizing in the past century took a decade of this work. This is 3 months into Trump's term.

[-] Bieren@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I never said anything about this being insignificant. I just said go do it in DC. Shut the fucking city down with people

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's a small army! Keep it up, people! Never let off the pressure!

[-] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

More of this energy please. Also more of this energy before the election would have been great.

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm assuming they counted the people outside the fence too, because there were a bunch of us that decided the line was too long to make it in before he spoke. And so the areas outside the fence looked this way too.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

This is PROOF that if Democrats want to Win another Election then they need to go FURTHER RIGHT and have Kamala Harris and Biden back!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

At this point, I'd like to see actual communism to own the reps.

[-] OhioComrade@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

The Party for Socialism and Liberation is starting to grow so you'll see it soon enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
374 points (98.7% liked)

pics

22424 readers
43 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS