well that's rude : programmer

[+] Yoga@lemmy.ca 121 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] gex@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago

Gender is not binary, it's hexadecimal

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

You want some 8x7A2 using the same bathroom as you???

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

I know right, this is gender we're talking about naming here! Not one of Elon's children

[+] Yoga@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I know, but he has $200b in assets, so it's hard to feel too bad for him

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Now around $400b. Which is a lot more than 1x38b.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The problem is that the amount is probably wrong by the time I finish writing the sentence. The only solution is to burn Tesla dealerships at a fast enough rate to cause a profit/loss equilibrium so we can report it correctly.

Damn, with solutions like these maybe I should just go work for DOGE

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

At least it seems more "scientific" than anything that Jung ever did.

https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories

[-] saimen@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.

[+] LostXOR@fedia.io 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My high school paid for everyone to take some type of career aptitude test. Everyone got a list of various possible career choices. Burned in my memory now is that I scored "region 99" which apparently meant my personality type didn't fit any jobs. Or something. Like their magic 8 ball told me to try again.

[-] Schal330@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

My school did something similar. It recommended I become a fish monger.

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Haha, did you ever try it out? Maybe it really was your life long calling.

[-] Schal330@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I didn't, but should I ever feel the need to try it I have already watched the tutorial video.

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Same story here. I didn’t pay attention and failed basic math. Suggestion: plumber.

[-] kraftpudding@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

A friend of mine got the recommendation to be a pedicurist. Not a manicurist, not some general aesthetician, nope. Test wanted him to work with feet so badly ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm supposed to be a bartender, which i guess sounds better than what i actually do.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I've become a computer tender.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

I think I finally found what I was put on this earth to do: Knife goes in guts come out.

-- Bart Simpson

[-] uservoid1@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Can I have an exception?

[-] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 15 points 10 months ago

"The samurai charged into battle, shouting You must install Adobe Flash plugin to view this content."

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

There ought to be a sub for that.

And no I'm not gonna be the change I want to see in the world, for the benefit of everyone involved.

[-] andioop@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

got that on programmer humor a few last year! finding that kind of unintentional message is always funny

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Why do you have to personally attack me like that?

[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Sigh! I should have known.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hey, that's Elite catastrophic failure!

[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 10 months ago

If you think 60 questions are going to tell you anything more than that you're the type of person who takes shitty online quizzes that's probably an accurate assessment.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Sir, this is a Lemmy's

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

He's saying it's a feature!

[-] andioop@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

On one hand, you should probably indeed take personality quizzes claiming to be scientific online with a grain of salt and actually check if they have that kind of backing.

On another, they're fun. I am indeed the type of person who takes shitty online quizzes! (And their sometimes-higher-quality sibling, the academic survey. I really miss r/samplesize) And that doesn't necessarily make me an idiot. I do wonder how to let my fellow quiz takers know that there are a lot of claims to scientific validity out there that just are not true without being a buzzkill, or condescending to the ones who already know and still participate for fun—because I absolutely get wanting to combat pseudoscience and misinformation.

However, I didn't take this quiz myself, I found this in a post online and thought Programmer Humor subscribers would find it funny.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 10 months ago

There's psychological quizzes that are much shorter than that. There's a four question quiz that, on the surface, is about parenting. They're actually about authoritarianism, and the answers are highly correlated with support for Trump.

https://www.vox.com/2016/3/1/11127424/trump-authoritarianism

[-] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 1 points 10 months ago

No one in 2025 has read all of that article.

Programmer Humor

Rules