729
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 220 points 2 days ago

Tech guy invents the concept of giving instructions

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago

With clear requirements and outcome expected

Why did no one think of this before

[-] wtckt@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago

Who does that? What if they do everything right and it doesn't work and then it turns out it's my fault?

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 121 points 2 days ago

It would be nice if it was possible to describe perfectly what a program is supposed to do.

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah but that's a lot of writing. Much less effort to get the plagiarism machine to write it instead.

[-] orvorn@slrpnk.net 81 points 2 days ago

Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a... code

[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago

But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 24 points 2 days ago

That's great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 20 points 2 days ago

How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?

[-] maiskanzler@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

We don't want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What, like some kind of design requirements?

Heresy!

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 2 days ago

Design requirements are too ambiguous.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

I'm a systems analyst, or in agile terminology "a designer" as I'm responsible for "design artifacts"

Our designs are usually unambiguous

[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

That's why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.

[-] drew_belloc@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago
[-] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I think our man meant in terms of real-world situations

[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

And NOT yet another front page written in ReactJS.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, well, that's good, because I have a ton of people who work with Angular and not React.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This still isn't specific enough to specify exactly what the computer will do. There are an infinite number of python programs that could print Hello World in the terminal.

[-] drew_belloc@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I knew it, i should've asked for assembly

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Ha

None of us would have jobs

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.

[-] Lime66@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago
[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago

Who even makes these comics? Is it like Simpsons

[-] zerofk@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Randall Munroe. You may know him from such gems as xkcd 3472 and 6548.

[-] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

Getting a bit ahead of yourself, we're only on 3070 so far!

[-] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Web browsing 101: if you see a hyperlink on social media, you can click on it and then look around to see if it contains more links with useful information, often in the header or footer of the page. Here I found one for you: https://xkcd.com/about/

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Human communication 101: sometimes humans ask a question without expecting an answer, it's called a rhetorical question

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago

Sorry, I assumed this was a place of discussion and conversation. You can either be helpful or don't, it's generally considered a dick move to taunt while being helpful.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

I wrote a shell script like this (it admin , notna dev) for private use.
The prompt took me like 5 hours of rewriting the instructions.
Don't even know yet if it works (lol)

[-] undefinedValue@programming.dev 28 points 2 days ago

OP just chatting with themselves so they can screenshot it?

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

That is some telegram group and both messages shows from left with profile icons(which got cropped). The screenshot person sent the last message which shows double ticks

[-] andrybak@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago

In the desktop client the positions of bubbles also depend on the width of the window.

[-] Talia@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago

That's just a fake conversation in general, look at the timestamps between the messages from the interlocutor. Several minutes to type a complete sentence?

[-] StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, i can take a few hours to reply sometimes :c

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Great attention to detail!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
729 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

22189 readers
3323 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS