259
submitted 2 months ago by commander@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 69 points 2 months ago

They’re looking for a sustainable revenue stream because the Google subsidy is bound to dry up.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 months ago

if they manage to make it an actual good product and also not host it in the US, they might even be able to pull it off

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Just be Proton without the support for fascism. Easy.

[-] arakhis_@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

isnt the proton ceo praising trump publicly?

[-] NKBTN@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Congratulated him on day 1, I don't think said anything since

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'd need to be able to choose a non-US server too. And even then, all the major tech firms breached EU laws by later transferring data back to the US. But if I had to trust an American company Mozilla would be among the better choices.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

They are thinking of having the user choose the juridiction. So far their testing is hosted in the EU apparently.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Isn't Mozilla a US company?

Somehow I don't see them leaving the place where they do business

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thunderbird and Firefox are developed by separate companies (both under the Mozilla Foundation). Thunderbird is funded through donations. Firefox is funded through (among other sources, such as Pocket and advertisements) the Google search deal. As far as I know it's not legally feasible (or even possible) for the Firefox money to go to Thunderbird or vice versa.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Article says revenue from this won't fund firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 52 points 2 months ago

Thunderbird is funded by donations and operates under the MZLA banner.

These articles today are doing a disservice to the Thunderbird team who work independently of Mozilla afaik.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Few know how things are structured. Or more importantly, how it could be restructured later.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago

These articles purport to be written by journalists though. Fact checking is meant to be a staple of the job description.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Independently of the Mozilla team, yes.

However, my understanding is that, if Thunderbird were to become ~~hugely~~ profitable, the Mozilla Foundation would benefit financially, though indirectly.

The organizational structure:

  • Mozilla Foundation = parent organization
  • MZLA Technologies Corporation (which owns Thunderbird) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation
  • Mozilla Corporation (which produces Firefox) is also a subsidiary of the Foundation

When Thunderbird moved to MZLA Technologies Corporation in January 2020, this was specifically done to allow Thunderbird to "collect revenue through partnerships and non-charitable donations".

As a wholly owned subsidiary, any profits generated by MZLA would ultimately flow back to its parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation.

In the end, that revenue would probably go to all the smart investments we've seen the Mozilla Foundation make over the previous years. 🙄

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

You're right, but I think "hugely profitable" is probably optimistic - I'd expect something to the level of Proton or Fastmail. Fine, but not a big money maker like Firefox is.

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Sure, applies to getting to any level of profitability.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

As written in the article

Moz doesn't contribute financially to Thunderbird's development, according to Sipes, and whatever revenue the Thunderbird team generates will go straight into furthering its work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 months ago

Ah yes the move from software developer to service provider. Smells like en(shit)tification.

Lets hope they do this right unlike everyone else.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 months ago

Smells like en(shit)tification.

What are the parenthesis here for? Without it would be "smells like entification"??

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

I’m cynical and already looking at forks

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

Good for you, but those forks too owe their existence (among other things) to the donations (and down the road subscriptions) to Thunderbird.

[-] brunox@feddit.cl 1 points 2 months ago

¿forks of email and calendar services?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brisk@aussie.zone 28 points 2 months ago

I really hope this doesn't impact the client too significantly. A substantial part of why I use Thunderbird is to keep out of these "ecosystems".

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

I'm sure Mozilla will run a heathy and sustainable project straight into the ground.

That's what they do

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Mozilla doesn't run Thunderbird

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Well... The Mozilla Corporation doesn't. But both the Corporation and MZLA (which makes Thunderbird) are owned by the Mozilla Foundation.

But yeah, the different org does probably matter.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] network_switch@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Always felt like this needed to happen for long time now. I guess now better than never. Got to figure out a business model. Reselling Mullvad as Firefox VPN was a start. I feel like everything that Proton does, Firefox should be doing but with a Linux file manager application

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago

Sounds like good news. I just hope they won't put some bullshit in the TOS saying they can scan your emails to train their AI.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

Would be great if they create a real competition to proton mail

[-] jackalope@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is great news!

People should check out thunderbird appointments if they haven't.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago

Uh oh. The reason gmail is profitable is because they see all your emails and sell your profile to others.

I dont want Mozilla doing that.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

In the article it says they will have no ads and no data mining. The user will pay for the service.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

I hope they’re going to keep the late 90s theme from Thunderbird. Maybe a dancing baby gif.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago

Have you used Thunderbird lately?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

What do you consider 90's?

I use Thunderbird and it is anything but 90's

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Oh, bother.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
259 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

20033 readers
8 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS