259
submitted 1 year ago by commander@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 69 points 1 year ago

They’re looking for a sustainable revenue stream because the Google subsidy is bound to dry up.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 year ago

if they manage to make it an actual good product and also not host it in the US, they might even be able to pull it off

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Just be Proton without the support for fascism. Easy.

[-] arakhis_@feddit.org 9 points 1 year ago

isnt the proton ceo praising trump publicly?

[-] NKBTN@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Congratulated him on day 1, I don't think said anything since

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'd need to be able to choose a non-US server too. And even then, all the major tech firms breached EU laws by later transferring data back to the US. But if I had to trust an American company Mozilla would be among the better choices.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

They are thinking of having the user choose the juridiction. So far their testing is hosted in the EU apparently.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't Mozilla a US company?

Somehow I don't see them leaving the place where they do business

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thunderbird and Firefox are developed by separate companies (both under the Mozilla Foundation). Thunderbird is funded through donations. Firefox is funded through (among other sources, such as Pocket and advertisements) the Google search deal. As far as I know it's not legally feasible (or even possible) for the Firefox money to go to Thunderbird or vice versa.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Article says revenue from this won't fund firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 52 points 1 year ago

Thunderbird is funded by donations and operates under the MZLA banner.

These articles today are doing a disservice to the Thunderbird team who work independently of Mozilla afaik.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Few know how things are structured. Or more importantly, how it could be restructured later.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

These articles purport to be written by journalists though. Fact checking is meant to be a staple of the job description.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Independently of the Mozilla team, yes.

However, my understanding is that, if Thunderbird were to become ~~hugely~~ profitable, the Mozilla Foundation would benefit financially, though indirectly.

The organizational structure:

  • Mozilla Foundation = parent organization
  • MZLA Technologies Corporation (which owns Thunderbird) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation
  • Mozilla Corporation (which produces Firefox) is also a subsidiary of the Foundation

When Thunderbird moved to MZLA Technologies Corporation in January 2020, this was specifically done to allow Thunderbird to "collect revenue through partnerships and non-charitable donations".

As a wholly owned subsidiary, any profits generated by MZLA would ultimately flow back to its parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation.

In the end, that revenue would probably go to all the smart investments we've seen the Mozilla Foundation make over the previous years. 🙄

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

You're right, but I think "hugely profitable" is probably optimistic - I'd expect something to the level of Proton or Fastmail. Fine, but not a big money maker like Firefox is.

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, applies to getting to any level of profitability.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

As written in the article

Moz doesn't contribute financially to Thunderbird's development, according to Sipes, and whatever revenue the Thunderbird team generates will go straight into furthering its work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago

Ah yes the move from software developer to service provider. Smells like en(shit)tification.

Lets hope they do this right unlike everyone else.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Smells like en(shit)tification.

What are the parenthesis here for? Without it would be "smells like entification"??

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

I’m cynical and already looking at forks

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Good for you, but those forks too owe their existence (among other things) to the donations (and down the road subscriptions) to Thunderbird.

[-] brunox@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago

¿forks of email and calendar services?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brisk@aussie.zone 28 points 1 year ago

I really hope this doesn't impact the client too significantly. A substantial part of why I use Thunderbird is to keep out of these "ecosystems".

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sure Mozilla will run a heathy and sustainable project straight into the ground.

That's what they do

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Mozilla doesn't run Thunderbird

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Well... The Mozilla Corporation doesn't. But both the Corporation and MZLA (which makes Thunderbird) are owned by the Mozilla Foundation.

But yeah, the different org does probably matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] network_switch@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Always felt like this needed to happen for long time now. I guess now better than never. Got to figure out a business model. Reselling Mullvad as Firefox VPN was a start. I feel like everything that Proton does, Firefox should be doing but with a Linux file manager application

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago

Sounds like good news. I just hope they won't put some bullshit in the TOS saying they can scan your emails to train their AI.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Would be great if they create a real competition to proton mail

[-] jackalope@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is great news!

People should check out thunderbird appointments if they haven't.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Uh oh. The reason gmail is profitable is because they see all your emails and sell your profile to others.

I dont want Mozilla doing that.

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

In the article it says they will have no ads and no data mining. The user will pay for the service.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

I hope they’re going to keep the late 90s theme from Thunderbird. Maybe a dancing baby gif.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Have you used Thunderbird lately?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

What do you consider 90's?

I use Thunderbird and it is anything but 90's

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, bother.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
259 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

22651 readers
1 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS