True, it's just funny that autopsy is the more technically correct term.
:didi-and-gogo:
We can't call the election until we have a statistically valid sample. New rule: every November we'll have an election per day until the 95% confidence intervals no longer overlap. Every 20 presidents we'll have a meta-analysis to see which one was the statistical error and annul everything that happened during their term.
post mortem
I mean if we're being prescriptivist about it, "autopsy" is preferable because it's a noun while postmortem is an adjective, the terms "autopsy" and "postmortem examination" being synonyms.
gross
And I do kind of like the ring of "autopsy" because it evokes a sense of pulling all the organs out and sticking them in jar full of formaldehyde for display and to poke at in the future, because if 2016 is any indication the examination is going to last a good long while. Maybe we should start calling it a "mummification."
Typical Commiefornia amirite?
It's not just the vote, people who have the energy to show up to protest have the energy to go out and knock on doors, raise funds, evangelize to friends and neighbors. The "well there's no rational alternative so I guess I have no choice" folks will vote for you, but they won't do anything to get anyone else's vote.
Looks like the liberal-to-that-which-they-claim-to-hate pipeline is operating at record efficiency.
Wait I didn't know we were signing up for inflicting fates on dynasties. That sounds awesome!
Spaghetti Western Leftists: "Does this mean Kamala is the Man in Black, or is the system the Man in Black?"
They're never going to give you ranked choice voting, Adam
The threat of termination shock seems like all the reason you'd ever need to not want to do this. It would be like handing a nation or group of nations a whole new style of nuke, except this one has a dead man's switch and can't be decommissioned.
That's the crazy thing about math: it's completely objective and devoid of assumptions!