Insane capacity batteries

Lossless power transmission via wires

Better magnetically levitating trains

Much more power efficient computers, electronics

The list is huge

127c is the maximum operating temperature. If it goes above that, it looses superconductivity.

This material below 127c (which is insanely hot for superconductors) will be superconductive.

Operating range is -273c to 127c

It is absolutely huge

It means that you can make supercapacitors which have larger energy storage density than our current batteries by who knows how many times

It matches and it's not an article but a research paper.

It's an office computer. More or less it is a requirement.

I personally use firefox.

Yeah, but the trained model is already there, you need additional data for further training and newer versions. OpenAI even makes a point that ChatGPT doesn't have direct access to the internet for information and has been trained on data available up until 2021

It seems rather suspicious how much ChatGPT has deteorated. Like with all software, they can roll back the previous, better versions of it, right? Here is my list of what I personally think is happening:

1. They are doing it on purpose to maximise profits from upcoming releases of ChatGPT.
2. They realized that the required computational power is too immense and trying to make it more efficient at the cost of being accurate.
3. They got actually scared of it's capabilities and decided to backtrack in order to make proper evaluations of the impact it can make.
4. All of the above

I mean, it makes it sound like he crashed into the tree. He scrapped his car mirror off into the tree. Dumb but that tree has seen a lot worse, stop with the damn clickbait

It's way bigger than that. Usually cinemas receive movies in multiple terabyte hard drives. Thats because they are using JPEG2000 standard (it varies, but it is close to lossless) and a movie can take up anywhere from 500GB to 2TB (highly dependent on resolution, it can go above 2TB). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_2000?wprov=sfla1

It doesn't, but at least it makes both think and hopefully improve the quality of the arguments. And with internet at our finger tips, it doesn't take much to double check a couple things :)

Haha, yes that indeed might be a problem! Any idea how to approach this without being incredibly annoying?

Problem here is the answer contains multiple explanations. When asking "why?" it needs to be more specific otherwise you get your problem.