It was me and I would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!

No, you shouldn't vote for Trump, you should probably walk into traffic.

You can't be both evil and condescending, pick one.

I actually have a somewhat serious question about this. I know a guy who had a really bland and boring surname so when he got married he took his wife's name. The thing is, she's from an ethnic minority and he is not. Am I wrong to think it's weird for a white person to change their name to a minority one but not the other way around? A Huang changing their name to Smith feels normal but a Smith changing their name to Huang just feels appropriationy.

Trying to find the source and I'm pretty sure this video is an edit. It's old footage spliced together. I'm taking it with a grain of salt for now.

Is this just Pew saying their research can't be trusted?

tankie

Yeah but there hasn't been a TES release in over a decade. From looking at videos of Starfield it seems Bethesda hasn't made great strides in that department, though.

BG3 also has that massive canyon of difference between the player and the companions since they were mocapped and acted out.

You don't have to pick firebolt, though. You can pick Friends for advantage on almost every single charisma check in the game. You can pick minor illusion to distract people and make enemies move into spots you'd prefer them to be in, like if you want to push someone off a ledge.

I'm ashamed to say I played a Dragonborn (for coolness) on my first playthrough. I hated up kinda hating it after a while, though, because her face didn't emote like the humanoids would.

You're fairly early in act 2, yeah. I personally thought the companion stories were really well written but it's maybe a little annoying that how certain things play out change depending on who is currently in your party.