They did report this particular injury.

Cut Wikipedia access for people in the UK and just have a page that says "wikipedia is unavailable in the UK due to local censorship laws"

It's not like they have to make a profit.

Tempted to agree. NATO has already committed all satellite, communication, ammunition, and equipment surpluses. It doesn't actually have much room for escalation without committing to a full on war with Russia.

Technically-- embassies are only protected from attack by their HOST country.

Russia could target the US, UK, French, and German embassies and state that they were military targets due to being staffed by military and intelligence staff. Those countries didn't condemn the attack against the Iranian consulate in Damascus, therefore Russia could argue, they are seemingly ok with having their embassies treated as military targets by a country they are military attacking with long range missiles.

Russia could call ahead and ensure the embassies are evacuated first.

Saw the same, felt the same.

Questioning my inaction.

If not us, whom? If not now, when?

The classified natoid armour was removed from frontal aspects that are designed to defeat APFSDS rounds in tank vs tank combat. Meanwhile, Russian drones are hitting spots that never had that armour in the first place by going for weakspots like the roof or the poorly protected ammo compartment at the back of the turret.

Even if these tanks were rolling around with their original armour, it wouldn't have saved any of the tanks that have been defeated so far.

The Angloid nations have temporarily awarded the Italian people with the status of "honorarily white" as a thank you for their defence of the traditional angloid cultural practise of genocide.

These Hamas anti-tank guys have also been very well instructed and equipped. They're using the right tactics, the right weapons, and hitting the right spots from the right ranges to bypass all layers of defensive systems. It may look chaotic in the videos, but Hamas has properly prepared their tank hunters for their work, and a lot of thought has gone into figuring it out.

They claimed "8000 dead terrorists" a few days ago, while that was upper estimate of civilian deaths.

none at all.

Prove it or shove it.

Born too soon to die in the climate wars,

I admire your optimism.

I think the Lancets themselves are slightly too crude. They're so light (12 to 20kg depending on the type of warhead) and have so much lifting surface that even moderate winds lower their accuracy too much. Even in a lot of the videos the Russians post online, they're actually in effect missing their targets in the final moments due to wind drift or insufficient yaw control. Often in the video's it's enough to look like a hit for propaganda purposes without actually damaging the target.

The concept they have is golden. Not everything needs to be hyper advanced, sometimes you just need a kamikaze lawnmover that's good enough to get the job done. The problem with the Lancet is it isn't always quite good enough to reliably get the job done in all weather conditions. Drifting a meter either side of a truck can fail to destroy it. Drifting a meter either side of a trench can turn a mass casualty incident into a nuisance. A breezey day is more effective than the entire remaining Ukrainian air-defense arsenal.

The Russians are constantly advancing and iterating their designs. The new glide bomb kits that they've been strapping onto existing FAB-500M62 bombs seem very effective and very accurate. Half a ton of glide bomb doesn't care about wind drift.