[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Yep, Google did buy recaptcha after all

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

BMI is a good metric for populations as there are very few athletes at that elite level compared to obese people. At an individual level it can be misleading if you're an athlete with a high muscle to body fat ratio

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Note: this was in 1987 that he was honoured

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

This is a cheese nightmare

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

Or anything to do with trans people at all

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Where in the article does it say she broke their dress code? Do you have a source?

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

From what they've said the game can run fine, but the issue is getting local split screen on the S working because it has such a small amount of RAM available

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

This reads very much like a tech bro wrote it

The writer assumes the reader is a man also. They use he and they to refer to programmers, but never she. The only time she is used in this entire document is referring to a woman delivering your code:

The outcome you should be thinking of is a lady who's going to get fired if she doesn't deliver the output of your program at 4:59pm sharp.

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

It's a great way to clear the mind, and it's empowering knowing you have the fitness to be able to run for a long distance. It sucks for the first 3 weeks starting out but is so much better after that

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

It's not a new game, but Chibi robo is entirely this concept

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm aware. Sample sizes to get a 95% confidence interval are significantly smaller in most cases than the average person thinks. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination and the section on required sample size for hypotheses tests. There's even sample size calculators online you can find that'll spit this number for a 95% CI out for you. Personally I think given that information, it's pretty unlikely the author made that error in a peer reviewed paper where reviewers are certainly aware as well

[-] Velonie@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

1000 is not small at all and with a properly designed study it's more than enough for statistical significance

view more: next ›

Velonie

joined 1 year ago