[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks for the explanation. Didn't realize Bluesky/AT is more like a fedi-washed version of ActivityPub rather than a real alternative ...

I'm not sure; on the one hand, I think the fact that federation has become a unique selling point in micro-blogging is indicating a positive trend; so even if people join Bluesky its good for the Fediverse. On the other hand, if federated just becomes another buzz word that means nothing at all, while places where the real innovation is happening are drowned out, the window of opportunity could just close.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure something like this will be the killer app for the Fediverse.

I think its more a transition-app as long as we have protocol wars. Most people are good with having access to the majority of the Fediverse and probably dont even know about the others.

Its still a great idea!

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Do you know how far the development is? (just curious)

75
70
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
70
-20
6
39
[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You are describing a different thing than what the idea of the fediverse is. Content is collected at an instance and these instances federate. That's why its called Fediverse: people basically form groups, these group federate. It's a social thing, there is trust involved. With blockchain, the idea is that you don't need to trust a central entity.

I think you talk about something like nostr.

-21
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

It's one of the first things I would expect from a site like this. I know that J.K. Rowlings views are very controversial to put it mildly, but:

  1. The fandom/books are not the author
  2. Harry Potter will become a part of the Fediverse at some point anyways - better to support it early on and shape its developing rather than having a company build a H.P. social network on top of the fediverse, which will be to our disadvantage
  3. In terms of potential users, this could be huge for the threadiverse
  4. We are in the Fediverse: defederation is always a possibility

Or was it just never tried before / no one wanted to yet?

13
-4
65
48
51
[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Well most of the complexity would be hidden. For example the Mastodon mobile client hides much of it. You can even sign up for a server there.

My main concern is the overlap between lemmy instances, meaning me and my mate can be looking at for example a channel named ‘news’ and see different contents because we are on different instances. So you either subscribe to all news channels on all major instances and see lots of duplicated posts, or miss out on some posts.

Yeah there has been much debate going on about that here

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think the joinlemmy is currently worked on

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

message boards

But thats what Mastodon does effectively. Then Lemmy would be another micro blogging service in the fediverse

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remember, there’s no revenue to compete over here. Analyses that depend on standard capitalist competition should be expected to not only be inaccurate here, but incoherent. They simply don’t describe the actual incentives for people’s behavior.

Maybe, but its just a model. You need to be more specific. I want at least a counter-example ;)

From a game theory perspective: You have no reason to believe that this specific payoff matrix actually describes the situation here. There are lots of other games besides the Prisoners Dilemma. Are you really sure you’re not looking at a Stag Hunt, or a Battle of the Sexes (terrible name, but that’s what the papers call it)?

Oh, I think you are right. Stag Hunt does fit better ... But I think it doesn't change anything about the overall argumentation (I think I actually accidentally used the numbers of stag hunt in the picture)

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jar jar binks. I found him actually funny as a kid

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

American Gods. I mean, still better would have been to just do it as good as the first season

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This was also complained about in this post: https://www.androidauthority.com/reddit-alternatives-lemmy-3335429/ and probably mirrors experiences of other lemmy-users, especailly new-comers.

One paragraph reads: "Sure, there are categorization tools like Lemmy map that let you look up instances, but the Matrix-like grid will certainly not make things any easier for the average user. Even after logging into Lemmyworld, it took me a while to figure out that the local tab restricts all conversations to discussions on the Lemmyworld server. Switching the tab to all and catching up on discussions happening in the broader multiverse of Reddit alternatives is also possible. Still, there’s no visual identifier that guides you toward it."

This was also my first impression of Lemmy and why I almost dropped it: I thought I could only interact with the communities on my server, which was very frustrating until I saw the filter for "all" and that I could join them just like that. Then it was fine.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My bad, that's a bit inconsistent. Actually I think it should be a graphic for mastodon - the talking bird analogy just makes the most sense there. Although it kind of works for the other too ...

view more: ‹ prev next ›

blue_berry

joined 1 year ago