That same article says it clear: the lion's share is the taxes part, not the house. If there was a public program, the taxes should be far lower. After all, that project wouldn't be a for profit one.
If a guy doesn't pay $3, has a knife and threatens the police -> mental problem. The answer isn't shooting but handling the situation and deescalating.
Because is your product and you want to "sell" it to the "customer". And you can't blame the customer for not wearing the "correct dress" if they come to your shop. And if you don't want them in your shop it's your loss, not the customers'.
There is one economic way to stop the genocide: the US and the EU threatening Israel with closing their markets to any Israeli product, including weapons.
"You are in a blue room. There's a fountain. There are doors north and east. What do you do?"
Wait until RISC-V starts being included in every Chinese EV.
How would aligning with Russia would help Israel when the US locks every weapon they can lock?
So essentially, shock doctrine. "This is bad, but it could be worse".
That would be a benefit FOR your customers. A business has to benefit FROM the customers, not from the workers.
And who said "from political expending"? I say controls. Like internal affairs is to the police. I think we can all agree every politician has to be accountable for his/her decisions, don't we?
bufalo1973
joined 1 year ago
It's the return of the network computer of the 9xs. But worse.