[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Get caught with some drugs? Years in prison.

Steal millions of dollars from the government for rich people? 20 months.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago
[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Oh, sorry about that. My wife and I use that follow up when we compliment each other, but it's probably not well known enough to just use randomly on the Internet.

But it's a reference to a flight of the concords song https://youtu.be/YwFPJ2AWrEU?si=1kAt6OcO_1Sy_Nbp

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I think I just don't think about it until it's happening, and then it's too late.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

But they won't even disclose that ACORN stands for Asynchronous Connector for Optical Relay Network!? Sounds like they were bought out by Big Oak...

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

If it's boring and generic, how is it also nonsense? That seems contradictory to me, but maybe I don't understand.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Do you know if you want to keep seeing them? If you do, or if you aren't sure yet, I think you just need more info. They might have experience with a violent ex, and so they're hyper-tuned to worry "what if this person I like suddenly becomes violent." Talking about an ex would definitely be a trigger for a lot of violent people, so it makes sense she was worried about that topic specifically. Anyways, maybe sit them down and say something like:

"Thanks for giving me a little time to process things, so I wouldn't say something I didn't mean. I was surprised when you said you were afraid I might become violent, as I've never been violent with another person, and I don't think my behavior is even very aggressive." (Assuming that's true about you, which I can't really know). "I want to know why you were worried about that possibility, and I don't feel like you gave me a clear answer last time we spoke. That being said, I totally understand this might be a sensitive subject for you, so I don't want to rush you if you're not ready to talk about it. But I like you, and I want to get to know more about you, and it will be hard for me to feel comfortable continuing to see you if I don't know what caused you to say what you did a couple days ago."

Or hey, maybe you aren't the best judge of yourself. Maybe include something in there like "If you feel like I have raised my voice or acted aggressively sometimes, I would really like to know, as I'm not aware of behaving like that. I promise I will be calm and collected if you want to tell me something like that."

I dunno, or maybe ask ChatGPT, it can probably write up something pretty good.

Oh yeah, but in summary, I think you are assuming her intentions were malicious due to your saying she's gaslighting you, when I'm not really 100% sure that's the case yet. I'd give her a chance to explain, but if y'all keep seeing each other, just keep an eye out for any further weirdness.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

It does sound crazy, but some of their echo chambers have spent YEARS repeating two conflicting messages 1) we need to use violence to "fix" the country and 2) anyone who actually tries to organize any activity is an FBI member trying to arrest people. It's true that a sane person still wouldn't try to go kill politicians by themselves, but it's no surprise to me that some of those members eventually do come to the "I am the only person who can fix this" conclusion.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Sorry, my reply was dumb. I don't know what you said back, but it was probably completely justified. 😄

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, the first one was a masterpiece in timing, and balance between story/action/comedy. This second one was great, I really enjoyed it, but the action scenes and the story development scenes both dragged on a little too long. Like did they need to have the meeting with the school councilor? I feel like they already covered a lot of those same points in his Dad's party.

There were a lot of laughs, but the laugh-per-minute ratio was lower mostly I think because the movie was longer.

Anyways, still very very enjoyable, but yeah I totally agree the first one is superior

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

You're alluding to leg atrophy from wheel chair use, but could you go ahead and explain how you believe not wearing a bra would be less detrimental to your tits?

(I don't disagree where you say it's bad for your posture, and I'm not even sure I disagree with you saying it's bad for your tits, which is why I'm asking for a clearer explanation. Maybe I just don't understand what you mean by "detrimental")

view more: ‹ prev next ›

calabast

joined 2 years ago