[-] calabast@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

Looks amazing. I've played tons of factorio, only tried satisfactory once for a little bit before going back to F, but after this post, I might have to give it another try.

I didn't realize it could look so pretty...

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

"If you can talk, you can work!"

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The only rush hour traffic in the whole movie is a lie by the bad guy, too. I hadn't ever thought about it, but yeah they could have done a lot better with the title. (But that's they ONLY aspect of the movie that isn't perfect!)

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Fuck, I'd probably even still pay for it.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

My problem with that story is that's the one time Jesus chose violence, vs the bajillion times he said to love your neighbor and turn the other cheek. But I've seen tons of posts by right wingers like "we should kill people we disagree with! Jesus was all about violence, did you hear about the time with the whip!?!?" using it as justification for their hate and totally ignoring all of Jesus's messages.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I mean we already know it's fake, they did it for the funny idea of the image. Why do many photoshop when few photoshop do trick?

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

This is the best comment I can make.

I agree

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, the first one was a masterpiece in timing, and balance between story/action/comedy. This second one was great, I really enjoyed it, but the action scenes and the story development scenes both dragged on a little too long. Like did they need to have the meeting with the school councilor? I feel like they already covered a lot of those same points in his Dad's party.

There were a lot of laughs, but the laugh-per-minute ratio was lower mostly I think because the movie was longer.

Anyways, still very very enjoyable, but yeah I totally agree the first one is superior

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

You're alluding to leg atrophy from wheel chair use, but could you go ahead and explain how you believe not wearing a bra would be less detrimental to your tits?

(I don't disagree where you say it's bad for your posture, and I'm not even sure I disagree with you saying it's bad for your tits, which is why I'm asking for a clearer explanation. Maybe I just don't understand what you mean by "detrimental")

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I saw a post about this on a conservative site, and they all took offense to the implication that he "needed to be stopped". And no one even mentioned the 'coronation' part.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Sorry, you forgot to disparage a group of people this time, so we actually can't play a card. But don't let that stop you from believing that everyone who disagrees with you is a brainwashed sheep or whatever you tell yourself. CERTAINLY don't start to wonder what if everyone disagreeing with you might actually just be because your opinions are dumb, that's a dark road to go down! 😂

view more: ‹ prev next ›

calabast

joined 2 years ago