[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

I'll give it a shot.

  1. China can discipline individual capitalists but it cannot discipline Capital (in more vulgar terms, international capital).

  2. Since it lacks this capacity China is therefore dependent on Capital cooperating with it to achieve its vision of Socialism.

  3. Thus it will not achieve Socialism with its current trajectory.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

5v5. All the most toxic games are 5v5, whether its CSGO or League etc. I can't stand them. Though the real problem is automated matchmaking and lack of server browsers, most other pvp games have ways of mitigating the toxicity but 5v5's really just encourage it full tilt.

I really wish larger team based esport games were the ones that took off, but alas.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Guess I'll be the Lib.

How is this any different than the German codetermination system? Honestly it seems like they're just copying it, though it does apply to small businesses too. Which is cool but I wouldn't call it workplace democracy.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 27 points 8 months ago

Having read the article now, its just a run of the mill fearmongering piece for more funding. I don't think we should take them as true believers, obviously some are dumb enough to be but this article in particular doesn't seem to be doing that.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 28 points 8 months ago

Why are they (or we) pretending that nukes don't exist? There is no direct traditional conflict that will happen, it'll either be proxy wars or nukes.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not just nationalism but also our naivete to how states act, regardless of whether they are 'socialist' or not. So many of the USSR's decisions prioritized the immediate interests/survival of the state at the expense of revolutions abroad and eventually those betrayals left it without the external support to survive the West's onslaught.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I hate to bring this up, but SpaceX (and I’m not giving Elon any credit here) as a private space company has done more significant advances than NASA has done in a long time.

Most of the fundamental technology breakthroughs were achieved by NASA in the 90's but due to various issues, the space shuttle being the obvious one (thanks Nixon/Agnew), they were not followed up on. Also NASA has worked very closely with SpaceX essentially from the beginning, just another case of the government selling off technology to a private company because it's the only way things change in this country.

NASA has no spacecrafts right now!

NASA has never built rockets or passenger carrying spacecraft. They have always contracted them out, yes even the Saturn V, with NASA oversight/management. Also you literally bring up Artemis so not sure what you're talking about.

using the same Solid Rocket Boosters (the very same defective booster design that caused the Challenger explosion)

You'll notice how they haven't had an accident since either but you can literally thank Obama for SLS.

At least SpaceX is trying something new with their Raptor engines.

Which itself is based on old Soviet and Aerojet Rocketdyne designs. Just like how Starship's design is inspired by the N1.

I’m not denying that there are some cool satellites and telescopes and stuff, but the heavy engineering that is going to blow everyone’s minds by achieving some incredible breakthroughs is not there anymore.

It was never there. Apollo only got funded as a way to 'peacefully' develop ICBM and related technologies. If China manages to land on the Moon before the US does again then perhaps there might be a similar program for Mars or an effort to industrialize LEO but while China is making progress in space they don't seem to be making it a priority and I would be genuinely surprised if they manage to make it to the Moon before the US/SpaceX does.

Edit: Also even if China did manage to somehow beat the US to the moon they don't have a fully reusable superheavy rocket (even their plans talk about the 2040's) so it would be a significant but ultimately very temporary victory.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So, hows privatizing the space sector going for you, America?

Well JPL has always been this way but go off. This is essentially punishment for their (mis)handling of the Psyche mission and other recent bureaucratic fuck ups. Obviously since those who did the fucking up are in charge of budget allocation, the workers take the brunt of it but its not as gloom and doom as it seems.

Really they should just cancel SLS and nationalize SpaceX but Elon would have to do something unforgivable for them to actually do it.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Didn't Alexander share a tent with his best friend Hephaestion though?

Yes and Hephaestion had died less than a year before Alexander. His body had to be physical pried away from Alexander because he wouldn't leave it for the entire day. He wept and didn't eat for three days after and had the doctor looking after Hephaestion hanged. He declared an empire wide period of mourning. They also both married daughters of Darius and Alexander hoped that a child who was related to the both of them would one day rule. You know ... normal heterosexual things.

Hephaestion's wikipedia page is where they put all the gay stuff since I guess it's too offensive to have in Alexander's.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah but not that kind of conspiracy. They meant it more in a Q adjacent way.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The whole trans sports thing came up but fortunately they're not super confrontational so I just rattled off some stats, the line about how no one cared about women's sports before this and if you really care that much about fairness you gotta ban people like Michael Phelps too. They stopped after that, for now anyways.

Not sure who it's from but there's a new talking point about food not being as nutritious as it used to be but in like a conspiratorial way not cus the soil is degrading from industrial agriculture way.

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

terrorist infrastructure

Oh that's a good term, really invalidates anything Hamas tries to do.

  • Build a factory to make rockets? Obviously terrorist infrastructure.
  • Build a power station to supply a hospital? They're hiding the rockets from the rocket factory in it, terrorist infrastructure.
  • Pour asphalt for a road? They're just making it easier for their trucks to transport the rockets from the rocket factory.
  • Put up some drywall? Well duh, they're trying to hide the rockets from the rocket factory that totally exists behind this unassuming wall that couldn't possibly have any other function, terrorist infrastructure.

It's just so versatile. Somehow I doubt if we started calling everything imperialist infrastructure that the media would be quite so accommodating despite it fitting the description much more aptly.

view more: next ›

impartial_fanboy

joined 4 years ago