Why should a text messenger be fun? It's a communication tool, not a game...
The stickers accessed via the sticker button left of the textbox. You can add stickers by going to https://signalstickers.org and click on add stickers. And you can add them some way if you receive a new one from a contact.
What is a list of links? Links you have sent/recieved previously?
afaik with nvidia x11 is still recommended for gaming
I use "aRDP free". I had to enable the advanced option "RDP Gfx", and set the resolution manually in the app to the resolution of my monitor, and everything works. Pc is wayland, gnome, arch.
It's just a reverse traceroute:
My claim that this website’s traceroute was the path your packets took to reach my server was a bit of a white lie. To calculate that, I would’ve had to be able to run a traceroute to my server from your computer. Instead, I ran the traceroute from my server to your computer and just reversed it. That’s also why the traceroute at the top seemingly loads in reverse order.
If I run traceroute to this server I get totally different results, ips are similar, but always different.
To run traceroute on *nix:
traceroute how-did-i-get-here.net
You may have to install the traceroute package
On windows:
tracert how-did-i-get-here.net
The 2024 season not even started, and it's about 2025. Will he race through the season knowing nothing matters, because he will leave anyway? It would be terrible for team morale, it sounds strange, fishy. Also Hamilton has a contract for 2025 with Merc.
Everything hints it's fake.
I don't want to repeat wikipedia, you can read about it in the section "1901-2000": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge#1901–2000
They even have 2 photos from the same location one from 1877, and the other from 2008.
Is there confirmation that the stones were returned to their same positions?
These are very tricky questions because, you have to define what is the "original" position. Stonehenge was built for nearly a 1000 years.
E.g. on the last stage they removed some stones at phase 3/V (1930 BC to 1600 BC). So which one is the original? Were they vandals, or this was part of the concept? Should we consider Stonehenge 3/IV as the true Stonehenge, because that was the biggest?
If you check the photo from 1877 you can see that a lot of stones were already fallen. In the video the guy says, it's a "modern representation". But what should be the correct workflow? Should we just let them collapse? Because that's the other option. And than what will you say to your grandson: "I'm sorry you cannot see Stonehenge, but we just let them fall"?
Another note if you think about Stonehenge as a sun calendar. The British Isles move about 2.5cm/year due to plate tectonics. It means Stonehenge moved 10 meters since it's construction. It's possible that at some point it will move too much that it won't even look at the correct direction, and the Stonehenge Avenue won't look at the sunrise of the summer solstice. In that case should we relocate the whole area to compensate for continental drifting? Because relocated version would be as intended, and the actual location would be just wrong.
We have the technology to move big things and place them elsewhere and reassemble. Read about Abu Simbel and the other Egyptian monuments moved because of the construction of the Aswan-dam. They still look majestic, and the other option would be nobody can see them because they are underwater. Are these "modern representations"?
Actually this question is part of a 100 years old debate without a final answer:
I like this one better:
There is a lot to choose from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-area_projection#List_of_equal-area_projections
If you would listen to it, you could hear, that most of the recording is just Jones preaching about various things, and the deaths happen during the last couple of minutes. Nothing you can hear, just silence, but you know why everyone is silent. It's not a soundtrack of a zombie movie.
So actually if you wouldn't know the context, it wouldn't be that creepy and frightening.
Afaik Bayern German is closer to Austrian German, than Hochdeutch. Hungarian doesn't have that kind of variants because the language is the same everywhere, but 1 million Hungarians live in neighbouring countries.
Do you expect every South American user to set that up correctly? What about languages without country, I guess you show the spanish version to basques living in France?
And I could continue if you want.