It seems deeply opposed to the spirit of selfhosting to have to pay for the privilege of accessing one's own server. If the software itself cost money, that would be one thing, but this whole monetization scheme is skeevy.

I think your take is reductive. Gender isn't about stereotypes. I'm sure that for many trans people, part of their trans discovery was not feeling like a stereotypical member of their sex, but there's more to it than that. You can say that gender relates to a lot of things. Gender is ultimately an internal experience that means different things to different people, and isn't necessarily related to identifying or not identifying with any given stereotype.

Bioessentialism in turn reduces people to genitals, and sort of refuses to address intersex people because something something "outliers don't count". At best it says sure, you can dress up however you want, but it's super important that everyone know What You Really Are so they can put you in a box and appropriately segregate society.

I can understand the concern with the ethics of AI art and plagiarism, but you're painting with a broad brush when you say that computer engineering can't be art.

Without considering AI, you can certainly make art through code. Math can be beautiful. Shaders in particular are a ripe avenue for programmatically generating art.

There are a lot of artists out there creating art through code, and there have been for significantly longer than the AI fad has been around. The act of creating the art is simply in writing the code, rather than in picking up a paintbrush. I doubt you accuse people who paint in Photoshop of "letting the computer paint for them", even if they use filters or something like the bucket fill tool. That's code creating art right there. But someone still had to input creativity, and writing code to create art that looks good requires creativity and effort and is absolutely art.

AI art has different problems with it, but "programming isn't art" isn't one of those reasons.

Why would a random browser extension take it upon itself to snoop on your traffic to ensure that the websites you're using can't be used for illegal things, and then intentionally break it if it detects something it thinks it's illegitimate? That's a huge breach of privacy. It's just malware at that point. It's not like a court of law would hold your browser extensions responsible for your piracy. That's like blaming a cup holder because the car was used in a robbery.

No, I think this is just a bug. Especially since people have reported that the extension breaks other websites too.

10.50.50.0 is not a valid IP address in most configurations. Have you tried 10.50.50.1?

Docker containers are more like LXCs—in fact, early versions of Docker used LXC under the hood, but the project diverged over time and support for LXC was eventually dropped as they switched to their own container runtime.

If you're already using Wireguard, it's super easy to add a VPS to your Wireguard network and route all traffic through it. Then you can port forward pretty easily using some iptables rules from the VPS public IP to an IP on the Wireguard network.

That said, doing it that way will involve routing all of your traffic through the VPS, which means you'll need a good low latency connection to your VPS. (You can set up split tunneling, but it's a bit of a hassle to do that and port forwarding.) An alternative would be to set up a reverse proxy on the VPS, and reverse proxy your VPN IP.

Any non-proxiable services probably shouldn't be exposed directly to the internet anyway, and you can simply expose them via VPN.

It's a shame you didn't like The Elysian Kingdom, I thought that was a great episode. But then I'm a sucker for episodes where the actors get to act out of character for a while, and a LARP episode was silly fun. I suppose it's just a preference thing.

I can't believe you compared it in the same breath as Code of Honor, though—lots of Trek is boring at times, but Code of Honor is straight up offensive, a true failure for Trek. If anything, Elysian Kingdom is more similar to Threshold in the "low quality" sense than to Code of Honor, which is actually an awful episode that shouldn't have been made.

What do you mean by double strike rules bending?

I think that's part why BG3 has taken off so much, honestly. We've had so many open world games with ridiculously large maps that a lot of people are disillusioned with the lack of depth.

BG3 with its narrower scope makes for a much deeper experience. I would love a game that can do both depth and breadth, but these games already are a massive undertaking.

If it ends porn blackmail, it also ends photographic evidence. I think that's significantly worse.

And sure the tech is bad if you just type a name directly into a model, but if you take the time to refine it it gets pretty good, and it's only going to get better over time. It's time to start thinking about a future where this tech exists.

A hypervisor is a great option because it lets you test a bunch of different software solutions to see what works for you, and it's a great way to learn. Proxmox VE is just a great software too.